https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116263
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
It's enough to report the failure on fclose.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116266
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116265
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101390
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jschmitz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116265
Jennifer Schmitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116266
Bug ID: 116266
Summary: rs6000: P10 vector insn ICE with -mno-vsx
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116265
Bug ID: 116265
Summary: Missing optimization: Vectorization of modulo operator
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116148
--- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin ---
Well, I guess the hppa issue isn't due to endianness any more, but the
signedness of char. 0x8f as signed char would be promoted to ff8f, which is
unexpected.
Could you help to verify it can pass with -fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116142
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111821
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefansf at gcc dot gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111752
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
The same thing repeats a bunch with the vec self-tests:
```
In function ‘release’,
inlined from ‘release’ at
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-15.0./work/gcc-15.0./gcc/vec.h:2027:20,
inlined from ‘_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116264
Bug ID: 116264
Summary: Spurious {NF}s in APX code
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21319
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44566
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||radek at podgorny dot cz
--- Comment #11 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116263
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
if (report_times_to_file)
{
int c = 0;
const char *const *j;
fprintf (report_times_to_file, "%g %g", ut, st);
``
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116263
Bug ID: 116263
Summary: -time=FILE doesn't report failure to write to FILE
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116262
Bug ID: 116262
Summary: Review gcc/testsuite/gcc.target dg-dg assemble uses
without -save-temps
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116221
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
That works, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116148
--- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #9)
> These two are reversed:
> Breakpoint 2 at 0x105a8: file
> /home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-
> struct-2.c, line 49.
> (gdb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116181
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 58855
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58855&action=edit
Work in progress patch
A work in progress patch which clears many odr warnings. M2RTS and
SysExceptions are st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115231, which changed state.
Bug 115231 Summary: [C++20] [Modules] deduction guides reachability
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115231
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115231
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115231
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca287145f23ec3ea987fc2eacde3994096cc528e
commit r15-2779-gca287145f23ec3ea987fc2eacde3994096cc528e
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116202
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Li Xu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06d3f31384a89039c510531cf8012caed05b2ffd
commit r15-2776-g06d3f31384a89039c510531cf8012caed05b2ffd
Author: Pan Li
Date: Tue Aug 6 20:59:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116064
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:596d1ed9d40b1081fcc6c6161a0135952829b88f
commit r15-2774-g596d1ed9d40b1081fcc6c6161a0135952829b88f
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-07
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100069
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116172
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-07
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109105
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45fdf838a21e151c2c676c4fcd056032e59f
commit r15-2772-g45fdf838a21e151c2c676c4fcd056032e59f
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116041
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/659655.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116261
Bug ID: 116261
Summary: [15 regression] RISC-V: gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1
timeout since r15-2739-g4cb07a38233
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116207
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4b35dab72b161f699aede157d90446973a71c99
commit r15-2771-gd4b35dab72b161f699aede157d90446973a71c99
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116247
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116247
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3290826c190157cfa6ac1c12cce39ff746e5983a
commit r15-2770-g3290826c190157cfa6ac1c12cce39ff746e5983a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116177
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116177
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77f36e8016e11c051aa8264f3c43ab2c27aece55
commit r15-2769-g77f36e8016e11c051aa8264f3c43ab2c27aece55
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115970
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115970
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 58854
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58854&action=edit
WIP patch to output diagnostics as SARIF notifications to a unix domain socket
The attached patch is very much
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116070
Bug 116070 depends on bug 116071, which changed state.
Bug 116071 Summary: [14 Regression] Non-inline destructor for class template
rejected with -std=gnu++14 -fconcepts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116071
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116071
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116223
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116223
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1102f7c478136bfe18ceaf7db9572a8a757a3d2
commit r14-10570-gb1102f7c478136bfe18ceaf7db9572a8a757a3d2
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112632
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1102f7c478136bfe18ceaf7db9572a8a757a3d2
commit r14-10570-gb1102f7c478136bfe18ceaf7db9572a8a757a3d2
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116071
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:987fc8174026cb3452b63d026cef686f4177526b
commit r14-10569-g987fc8174026cb3452b63d026cef686f4177526b
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116209
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch set submitted:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20240806212714.308434-1-quic_apin...@quicinc.com/T/#t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116252
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260
Bug ID: 116260
Summary: testsuite-management/validate_failures.py: split
multilib ABIs in results
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116247
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116259
Bug ID: 116259
Summary: __builtin_assoc_barrier with VLA type ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: aarch64-sve, ice-on-valid-code
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116258
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86 _64 aarch64
--- Comment #1 from And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116258
Bug ID: 116258
Summary: PAREN_EXPR lowering for vectors is bad
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116257
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116257
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116257
Bug ID: 116257
Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] vmlaq_lane_f32 no longer uses
fmla
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116155
--- Comment #13 from Dimitar Dimitrov ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #12)
> (In reply to Dimitar Dimitrov from comment #11)
> >
> > With that change, the test passes for both x86 and pru.
> thank you for the testing. could you please pre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116015
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
As in bug 100252, we have:
D.2872 = {.rows=(&)->n,
.outer_stride=(&)->rows}
that is, two PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs for different types on the same level in one {
}.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116256
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/cm_mv_rv32.c -Os check-function-bodies sum
This looks like an ra issue. it spills to the stack a1 rather than to a
volatile register. There was an extra psedu-register before la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109105
--- Comment #6 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #5)
> Roland, please let me know if this resolves the isseue. Regression tested on
> linux-x86_64. No new test cases.
Yes, from a translator's perspective, this patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116015
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Matrix A1{{n}};
ICEs too, but not
Matrix A0{{}};
Matrix A2{{n, n}};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115060
--- Comment #6 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Feng Xue from comment #5)
> Fixed.
I confirmed that I don't see the failure anymore.
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116256
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116256
Bug ID: 116256
Summary: [15 Regression] RISC-V: testsuite failures since
late-combine-pass
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>That stop value is computed so I am not sure which line is generating it.
Well the failure is in check_spread as the stop value is 10+2. and the failure
itself is in:
if (any (a%i .ne. ii)) stop st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116148
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin ---
These two are reversed:
Breakpoint 2 at 0x105a8: file
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-2.c,
line 49.
(gdb) p/x with_fam_3_v.a[0]
$13 = 0x1f
(gdb) p/x with_fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Note on x86_64, with `-O3 -m32`, this testcase ICEs:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/659528.html
rather class_transformational_1.f90 ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Component|other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116255
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116255
Bug ID: 116255
Summary: [15 only] RISC-V: STOP 12 execution error on
gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
Bug ID: 116254
Summary: new test case gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90
from r15-2739-g4cb07a38233aad fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116209
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have a few other cleanups here too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I have a fix for the ranger code; this is not a fix for the diagnostic
issue mentioned here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109105
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 58853
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58853&action=edit
Proposed patch to clean this up.
Attached patch uses a simple helper macro, CHECK_INTERFACES, to avoid the use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 100252, which changed state.
Bug 100252 Summary: [12 Regression] Internal compiler error during template
instantiation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100252
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100252
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by John David Anglin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:960e42bba8d276ea31cb0b37acfa8f3739d55f1d
commit r12-10661-g960e42bba8d276ea31cb0b37acfa8f3739d55f1d
Author: John Davi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by John David Anglin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6624adc535a165ab667646c57b73e213d868cca
commit r13-8963-gf6624adc535a165ab667646c57b73e213d868cca
Author: John David
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by John David Anglin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba26c471cf6ee760e53836fd4e9bc00250b8b882
commit r14-10568-gba26c471cf6ee760e53836fd4e9bc00250b8b882
Author: John Davi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc01f249db5c4d08b76dc2783b1539290a800f2d
commit r15-2765-gdc01f249db5c4d08b76dc2783b1539290a800f2d
Author: John David Anglin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108796
--- Comment #15 from Joseph S. Myers ---
The [[]] syntax is supported in C from GCC 10 onwards (in C++ in older versions
as well). What's new in GCC 14 is that you can use it with :: in pre-C23 modes
(with previous versions you needed -std=gnu2x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116166
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> collected sofar. I've noticed with the backwards threader that path
> ranger isn't very good in the ability to preserve a cache when adding
> blocks. But
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108796
--- Comment #14 from Bruno Haible ---
(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #13)
> Everything available with __attribute__ is also available with [[]];
> __attribute__((foo)) is [[gnu::foo]].
Indeed, according to
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110090
--- Comment #2 from Gina Peter Banyard ---
Apologies for the late reply.
This is indeed reproducible on GCC 14.2.1, as the php_date.i file is to large
to post as an attachment I have put it on a gist:
https://gist.github.com/Girgias/c72c9b95356
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94568
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112632
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4add6cd341a779e980e41ed6fb49175fca37496e
commit r15-2760-g4add6cd341a779e980e41ed6fb49175fca37496e
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116223
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2a8ee0e5d8cfa92bafd0db4b03626b26ac21948
commit r15-2761-gb2a8ee0e5d8cfa92bafd0db4b03626b26ac21948
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116223
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4add6cd341a779e980e41ed6fb49175fca37496e
commit r15-2760-g4add6cd341a779e980e41ed6fb49175fca37496e
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94568
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:352c21c8a22a48d34cbd2fbfe398ee12c0a1d681
commit r15-2759-g352c21c8a22a48d34cbd2fbfe398ee12c0a1d681
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108796
--- Comment #13 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Everything available with __attribute__ is also available with [[]];
__attribute__((foo)) is [[gnu::foo]]. You *do* need to ensure that the
[[gnu::foo]] is placed in the right syntactic position for the e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116152
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick O'Neill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c3f476e55149f542de538e97dd9800ec9bd1011
commit r15-2757-g4c3f476e55149f542de538e97dd9800ec9bd1011
Author: Patrick O'Neill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96780
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:180625ae72b3f733813a360fae4f0d6ce79eccdc
commit r15-2756-g180625ae72b3f733813a360fae4f0d6ce79eccdc
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114064
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-06
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116253
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 58852
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58852&action=edit
Output from attachment 58851 with -fconcepts-diagnostics-depth=3 -std=c++20
-fdiagnostics-format=sarif-file on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116253
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116253
Bug ID: 116253
Summary: RFE: support for nested diagnostics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: SARIF
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
