[Bug c++/103968] [11/12 Regression] ICE and segfault when instantiating template with lvalue ref argument and nested template type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103968 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug c++/102123] [11/12 Regression] Internal Compiler Error occurs during template deduction in use with templates as template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102123 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/102045] [11/12 regression] constructor is not being instantiated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102045 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hewillk at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/102654] [11/12 Regression] undefined reference to `std::variant::variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102654 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug go/104832] gccgo / libgo Reproducibility Problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104832 --- Comment #7 from Toolybird --- I just stumbled across this openSUSE bug report which may or may not be related: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188621 Interesting that it mentions filesystem readdir which I hadn't considered

[Bug c++/103943] [11/12 Regression] ICE building qualified name inside class with variadic CTAD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103943 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/102045] [11/12 regression] constructor is not being instantiated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102045 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/100282] local class in lambda in pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100282 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hewillk at gmail dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/103428] [11/12 Regression] Parameter packs not expanded with local struct in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103428 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/104847] [11/12 Regression] ICE in write_unqualified_name, at cp/mangle.cc:1406

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/96780] debuginfo for std::move and std::forward isn't useful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96780 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill --- *** Bug 104719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libstdc++/104719] Use of `std::move` in libstdc++ leads to worsened debug performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104719 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Target Milestone|---

[Bug sanitizer/84508] Load of misaligned address using _mm_load_sd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508 Peter Cordes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at cordes dot ca --- Comment #14 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/104987] [12 Regression] Recent change causing vrp13.c regressions on several targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104987 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Highly confident this is a simulator bug for the v850. I hiaven't looked at iq2000-elf yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if that turns out to be something similar.

[Bug c++/102538] [11 Regression] Wrong narrowing conversion checking for initializer with union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102538 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103299] [11 Regression] accessing incorrect storage for designated init of anonymous union at constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103299 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/101767] [11 Regression] Aggregate initialization fails for struct that has both unnamed struct and union fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/102740] [11 Regression] Data member not found in struct inside an unnamed union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59950] [9/10 Regression] Bogus diagnostic "taking address of temporary" taking address of trivial no-op assignment to temporary with empty class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59950 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] Bogus |[9/10 Regression] Bogus

[Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/99754] [sse2] new _mm_loadu_si16 and _mm_loadu_si32 implemented incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99754 --- Comment #6 from Peter Cordes --- Looks good to me, thanks for taking care of this quickly, hopefully we can get this backported to the GCC11 series to limit the damage for people using these newish intrinsics. I'd love to recommend them for

[Bug c++/104620] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp23/consteval-if2.C -std=gnu++20 (test for errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104620 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #10) > That'd work for finish_call_expr and build_new_method call since they're > given the original arguments, but other callers e.g. build_new_op never see > the or

[Bug target/105066] New: GCC thinks pinsrw xmm, mem, 0 requires SSE4.1, not SSE2? _mm_loadu_si16 bounces through integer reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105066 Bug ID: 105066 Summary: GCC thinks pinsrw xmm, mem, 0 requires SSE4.1, not SSE2? _mm_loadu_si16 bounces through integer reg Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/102869] [11/12 Regression] Expansion pattern 'std::integer_sequence' contains no parameter packs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102869 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/103770] [11 Regression] ICE related to VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103770 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||niget.tom at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/105065] Internal compiler error (segfault) when calling a function with a sized array parameter returning a type bigger than 16 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105065 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/105065] New: Internal compiler error (segfault) when calling a function with a sized array parameter returning a type bigger than 16 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105065 Bug ID: 105065 Summary: Internal compiler error (segfault) when calling a function with a sized array parameter returning a type bigger than 16 bytes Product: gcc

[Bug libstdc++/59769] please add ios_base::__noreplace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59769 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- ... by LEWG and LWG. It still has to pass at plenary to get into the draft.

[Bug libstdc++/59769] please add ios_base::__noreplace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59769 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Approved for C++23

[Bug c++/84918] Better handling of "std::cout >> 42;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84918 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |---

[Bug c++/89883] Excessive candidates for ambiguous overload in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89883 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/105050] error: expression '' is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105050 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Thanks!

[Bug c++/105064] requires crashes gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105064 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/105052] Incorrect constraint on SSSE3 split patterns with MMX operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105052 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/105055] pr95483-1.c makes incorrect assumption of SSE2 being enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105055 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/105058] Incorrect register constraint in KL patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105058 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/105052] Incorrect constraint on SSSE3 split patterns with MMX operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105052 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40e7524ada2f09ec80d8083b9608a10ed516d8fe commit r10-10514-g40e7524ada2f09ec80d8083b9608a10ed516d8fe Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu

[Bug testsuite/105055] pr95483-1.c makes incorrect assumption of SSE2 being enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105055 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:856efb41a873adf2b3e9332cc296c64f6adff240 commit r11-9696-g856efb41a873adf2b3e9332cc296c64f6adff240 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri

[Bug target/105058] Incorrect register constraint in KL patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105058 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0ed5f0763933de8287b3e01aa7fd3efdd77d485 commit r11-9695-gf0ed5f0763933de8287b3e01aa7fd3efdd77d485 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri

[Bug target/105052] Incorrect constraint on SSSE3 split patterns with MMX operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105052 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee25401b10a1ca6157c0a02f49f47e7b253af123 commit r11-9694-gee25401b10a1ca6157c0a02f49f47e7b253af123 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu

[Bug middle-end/104885] ICE in compiling new test case g++.dg/other/pr84964.C after r12-7607-ga717376e99fb33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104885 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41d1f11f5f693a2a06c65c9467a28dfeb02aed85 commit r12-7833-g41d1f11f5f693a2a06c65c9467a28dfeb02aed85 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Sat M

[Bug c++/84964] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84964 --- Comment #23 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41d1f11f5f693a2a06c65c9467a28dfeb02aed85 commit r12-7833-g41d1f11f5f693a2a06c65c9467a28dfeb02aed85 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Sat M

[Bug tree-optimization/104987] [12 Regression] Recent change causing vrp13.c regressions on several targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104987 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- For the v850 at least, I'm starting to think this is a simulator bug. In particular the simulator code doesn't look safe on a 64bit host for a signed input to the MUL instruction.

[Bug rtl-optimization/103775] [12 Regression] Assembler messages: Warning: unpredictable transfer with writeback -- `ldrb w0,[x0,16]!'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103775 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105064] New: requires crashes gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105064 Bug ID: 105064 Summary: requires crashes gcc Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: u

[Bug gcov-profile/105063] New: [GCOV] Ability to map .gcda paths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105063 Bug ID: 105063 Summary: [GCOV] Ability to map .gcda paths Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profil

[Bug rtl-optimization/103775] [12 Regression] Assembler messages: Warning: unpredictable transfer with writeback -- `ldrb w0,[x0,16]!'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103775 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6459e6537632bc06e04e6011ca7fb6488f0e8e7d commit r12-7832-g6459e6537632bc06e04e6011ca7fb6488f0e8e7d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c++/103455] [9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p since r9-713-gd9338471b91bbe6e1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103455 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]

[Bug c++/105050] error: expression '' is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105050 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff465bd8a0f0f96a00d3067018442917b194b7af commit r12-7831-gff465bd8a0f0f96a00d3067018442917b194b7af Author: Patrick Palka Date: S

[Bug c++/103455] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p since r9-713-gd9338471b91bbe6e1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103455 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04f19580e8dbdbc7366d0f5fd068aa0cecafdc9d commit r12-7830-g04f19580e8dbdbc7366d0f5fd068aa0cecafdc9d Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug target/105058] Incorrect register constraint in KL patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105058 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ede5f5224d55b84b9f186b288164df9c06fd85e7 commit r12-7829-gede5f5224d55b84b9f186b288164df9c06fd85e7 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Mar 25 10

[Bug target/105052] Incorrect constraint on SSSE3 split patterns with MMX operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105052 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99591cf43fc1da0fb72b3da02ba937ba30bd2bf2 commit r12-7828-g99591cf43fc1da0fb72b3da02ba937ba30bd2bf2 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Mar 24 21

[Bug tree-optimization/105062] New: Suboptimal vectorization for reduction with several elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105062 Bug ID: 105062 Summary: Suboptimal vectorization for reduction with several elements Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimizati

[Bug analyzer/105057] [12 Regression] ICE: in get_or_create_cluster, at analyzer/store.cc:2658 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105057 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/105057] [12 Regression] ICE: in get_or_create_cluster, at analyzer/store.cc:2658 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105057 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c8993c75309901e03418eba1d6239b9a39a43b7 commit r12-7827-g8c8993c75309901e03418eba1d6239b9a39a43b7 Author: David Malcolm Date: F

[Bug c++/105061] [9/10 Regression] [c++2a+] anonymous bitfield templated offset rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061 --- Comment #1 from Will Wray --- Hmm, the accepted simplified version ^^^ with typename parameter removed is then rejected if 'unsigned' is replaced with 'uint32_t' from #include template struct uint_offset_bitfield { uint32_t :

[Bug c++/105061] New: [9/10 Regression] [c++2a+] anonymous bitfield templated offset rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061 Bug ID: 105061 Summary: [9/10 Regression] [c++2a+] anonymous bitfield templated offset rejected Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: reject