https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88970
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #0)
> But it may have a number of duplicates already…
…like recently fixed PR86216 and still open but unreproducible PR79627?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94011
Bug ID: 94011
Summary: ICE in validate, at analyzer/region-model.cc:3727
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93927
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a422f68924dbe9e0d8c4b0a0acbbadeaf0965d49
commit r10-6986-ga422f68924dbe9e0d8c4b0a0acbbadeaf0965d49
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #41 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #38)
> We could also use memcmp for std::equal when it's using std::equal_to<> or
> std::equal_to<_ValueType1> or std::equal_to<_ValueType2>, and for
> std::lexicographic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #39 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #38)
> We could also use memcmp for std::equal when it's using std::equal_to<> or
> std::equal_to<_ValueType1> or std::equal_to<_ValueType2>, and for
> std::lexicographic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #40 from fdlbxtqi ---
to_address(__first),to_address(__second)
to_address(__first1),to_address(__first2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94008
Nicholas Krause changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94010
Bug ID: 94010
Summary: [missed optimization] -fmerge-all-constants misses
simple array merging
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fengshenjun at yeah dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94009
Bug ID: 94009
Summary: program (which use condition_variable) segment fault
when compile with -static
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94008
Bug ID: 94008
Summary: "use of deleted function" error when using
"std::unique_ptr", std::move() and lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94007
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94007
Bug ID: 94007
Summary: Appending a view into a string to the same string
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90732
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 90732, which changed state.
Bug 90732 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE with std::apply after variable length
array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90732
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94006
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I thought SRA would have done it.
BUT it does not.
The C front-end does the optimization while it is gimplifying the original tree
for some reason ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94006
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90883
--- Comment #32 from Jim Wilson ---
The proposed patch looks OK to me. I suggest you submit it to gcc-patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93986
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94006
Bug ID: 94006
Summary: Poor codegen for cond ? lval1 : lval2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Prior
fine.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 10.0.1 20200302 (experimental) [master revision
778a77357ca:87d8bb8fb8c:917e56a94f9d3189d7fa9d1944b7513258195887] (GCC)
#correct value:
$ gcc-trunk -g abc.c
$ gdb -x cmds -batch a.out
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4004ec: file abc.c, line 11.
Breakpoint 1, i () at abc.c:11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93959
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93959
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f00b22f98ec0688fcd9816a03aa3f7eea58bcf7
commit r10-6981-g9f00b22f98ec0688fcd9816a03aa3f7eea58bcf7
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93442
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 88256, which changed state.
Bug 88256 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
make_ssa_name_fn) with VLA cast, C++ FE missing DECL_EXPRs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81862
Bug 81862 depends on bug 86917, which changed state.
Bug 86917 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at
cp/constexpr.c:2798
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 86917, which changed state.
Bug 86917 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at
cp/constexpr.c:2798
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:054aeaef276572c2ccbedbd7aa86046be338603c
commit r9-8324-g054aeaef276572c2ccbedbd7aa86046be338603c
Author: Jason Merrill
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92601
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d5df8e3221c5fe5c8aca0334655b075bd9ea556
commit r9-8321-g9d5df8e3221c5fe5c8aca0334655b075bd9ea556
Author: Jason Merrill
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:166c024a1969ca9e77ed450fb65ce5c926a315dc
commit r9-8318-g166c024a1969ca9e77ed450fb65ce5c926a315dc
Author: Jason Merrill
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f137a7c6b122e524294fb792bb97d5f3b0600c4f
commit r9-8322-gf137a7c6b122e524294fb792bb97d5f3b0600c4f
Author: Jason Merrill
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90732
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ccbda907d1fd3a202ff2bd951828cc97abb1a8d
commit r9-8319-g1ccbda907d1fd3a202ff2bd951828cc97abb1a8d
Author: Jason Merrill
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:166c024a1969ca9e77ed450fb65ce5c926a315dc
commit r9-8318-g166c024a1969ca9e77ed450fb65ce5c926a315dc
Author: Jason Merrill
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60503
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:166c024a1969ca9e77ed450fb65ce5c926a315dc
commit r9-8318-g166c024a1969ca9e77ed450fb65ce5c926a315dc
Author: Jason Merrill
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93442
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e83a2d943a1affc8d945430b8feca290169fe3d7
commit r9-8320-ge83a2d943a1affc8d945430b8feca290169fe3d7
Author: Jason Merrill
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91953
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4e53e9b3c963b1c0fe9637618dec8042764f599
commit r9-8323-gb4e53e9b3c963b1c0fe9637618dec8042764f599
Author: Jason Merrill
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94002
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871
--- Comment #36 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 11:20:56AM +, thenlich at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871
>
> --- Comment #35 from Thomas Henlich ---
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
I'm not sure yet -- I remember issues I'd seen with the patch, but those issues
were somehow resolved, so the maybe_lvalue_p bit was all that was needed on
trunk. I need to do a regtest/bootstrap on 9 to see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93997
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|ubizjak at gma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93997
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93986
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93982
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93974
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93997
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b80cbe2d8d46c8518dca2d781c8ee4d02c5ba1ed
commit r10-6979-gb80cbe2d8d46c8518dca2d781c8ee4d02c5ba1ed
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Mon Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93989
--- Comment #5 from Michael de Lang ---
Created attachment 47953
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47953&action=edit
self-contained minimal test case
I managed to reduce the test case to a single file, which also produces the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #48 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #47)
> Martin, yea, your patch does prevent creation of the V_C_E. That in turn
> allows maybe_a$live_7 to be directly used in the conditional which in turn
> allows
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93982
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93279
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93982
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93982
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92982
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f26688fbe441375e907f0dd2f35837681870b1f4
commit r10-6978-gf26688fbe441375e907f0dd2f35837681870b1f4
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #47 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Martin, yea, your patch does prevent creation of the V_C_E. That in turn
allows maybe_a$live_7 to be directly used in the conditional which in turn
allows tree-ssa-uninit.c to realize the problematic path
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93927
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93998
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93992
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Assignee|jakub at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93992
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93981
jwjagersma at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47941|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93958
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93958
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e78e50d57edf4e0e49576a7a31b01477eed08223
commit r10-6977-ge78e50d57edf4e0e49576a7a31b01477eed08223
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93486
Andrew Benson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93486
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Benson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3c276aec26d9e406cc4bbf0e18b1105df63f0ee
commit r10-6976-gf3c276aec26d9e406cc4bbf0e18b1105df63f0ee
Author: Andrew Benson
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Bisection points to r254630 which doesn't look related to -Walloca:
commit 025d57f037ad13eb479818b677ef4be4d97b639c
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Fri Nov 10 16:35:26 2017 +
PR c/81117 - Improve buffe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93998
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93971
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Using std::string as a dynamically-resizable buffer of bytes isn't completely
unreasonable, although I can't see many reasons to prefer std::string to
std::vector for that purpose.
For either type, it mig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93972
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Even more fixed now.
hms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.1 20200302 (experimental) (GCC)
I verified I uploaded the correct testcase.
$ md5sum testcase.c
7bb83f9b5b51256c6151de99df6d6d58 testcase.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93972
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d112e173ea093f55a16a14b26ef65088381ee09c
commit r10-6975-gd112e173ea093f55a16a14b26ef65088381ee09c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94003
--- Comment #1 from Julius Hülsmann ---
Created attachment 47949
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47949&action=edit
preprocessed file (g++ --save-temps file.cc)
This contains the preprocessed file generated via g++ --save-tem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004
Bug ID: 94004
Summary: missing -Walloca on calls to alloca due to
-Wno-system-headers
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94003
Bug ID: 94003
Summary: is_constructible seems to have sideeffects
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93832
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markeggleston at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93971
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
The possibility of storing something other than char in std::string never
entered my mind, and I'm pretty sure the container was never meant for that.
But whether the standard has all the restrictions in plac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #38 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We could also use memcmp for std::equal when it's using std::equal_to<> or
std::equal_to<_ValueType1> or std::equal_to<_ValueType2>, and for
std::lexicographical_compare when it's using std::less<> or
std:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Similarly, the condition for using memcmp in std::equal is too strict:
typedef typename iterator_traits<_II1>::value_type _ValueType1;
typedef typename iterator_traits<_II2>::value_type _Value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93974
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> I'm CCing Vlad, since I need some guidance/help for some LRA questions.
>
> Vlad, do you have some guidance on what should be done when we see
> an address l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93981
--- Comment #13 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com ---
Is there some point at which debug statements are supposed to be copied
over to the next BBs? That appears to be what
maybe_move_debug_stmts_to_successors (tree-inline.c:2799) does, but it
is on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93998
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
It's the new
5452 /* Avoid evaluating a TARGET_EXPR more than once. */
5453 if (tree *p = ctx->global->values.get (TARGET_EXPR_SLOT (t)))
5454 {
5455 if (lval)
5456
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86976
Bug 86976 depends on bug 93991, which changed state.
Bug 93991 Summary: FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/2.cc execution test -
'errorstate == ios_base::eofbit' failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93991
What|R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93991
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71367
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92305
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|burnus at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92844
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93991
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93991
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |*-*-linux-gnu
Host|hppa-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93981
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to jwjagersma from comment #11)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> > Some stmt-ends-BB predicates are probably off for asms.
>
> For stmt_ends_bb_p (tree-cfg.c:2763) the call chain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 47948
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47948&action=edit
DSE part
I'm now testing the combined (and will squash if that succeeds).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94002
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47922|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93998
--- Comment #3 from Viktor Ostashevskyi ---
Bisected to:
ee1de08d4d22648cf3168caa60e283135755da85 is the first bad commit
commit ee1de08d4d22648cf3168caa60e283135755da85
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tue Dec 3 20:27:47 2019 +0100
re PR c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94001
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
