https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93974
Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #13)
> Sorry, I have no good knowledge of decompose_address. The original author
> is Richard Sandiford and it is even not in RA sources (it is in rtlanal.c).
>
> I'd recommend to ask Richard may be he has some insights or just modify to
> make it work in this case. I can only say it is a sensitive code which can
> affect a lot of targets if something is not done right. We had such problems
> with this code in the past.
Ah, ok, CCing Richard.
Richard, can you comment on the findings in Comment #4? Do we just need to add
support for seeing a (plus (and: ....) (const int 8)) type of address or should
we have never created anything like that in the first place or ???
