https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #33 from Matt Breedlove ---
bootstrap-lto fails to build:
`isl_union_map_read_from_str' referenced in section `.text' of
M:\msys64\tmp\cceOtKWH.ltrans0.ltrans.o: defined in discarded section `.text'
of isl_input.o (symbol from plugin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59098
fenugrec at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fenugrec at users
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65976
Bug ID: 65976
Summary: gfortran man-page lists the -fno-fixed-form flag but
does not define it, and it doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
--- Comment #1 from Carl Ponder ---
This is a problem with both 4.8.4 and 5.1.0.
I didn't test any of the others.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
Bug ID: 65975
Summary: !$ is not recognized as a comment when -fopenmp flag
is used
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65971
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
Bug ID: 65974
Summary: Bogus deprecated-declarations warnings for inline
definitions of deprecated virtual methods
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65973
Bug ID: 65973
Summary: Current gcc 6 snapshot fails with segmentation fault
when compiling C++14 code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: bl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
Marcus Kool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65776
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
--- Comment #8 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 65776 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65972
Bug ID: 65972
Summary: ICE after applying a patch to enable the vectorizer.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65971
--- Comment #2 from Manfred Schwarb ---
Hmm, that's a pretty new binutils version.
So it is not possible any more to build GCC on somewhat older
installations?
This seems not to be documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html,
at lea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #32 from Matt Breedlove ---
I've been building with just the corrected open call and have successfully
built LTO versions of binutils, mpc, mpfr, isl, libiconv, bzip2, zlib, etc
without any issue but have had issues on doing a bootstr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65971
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65971
Bug ID: 65971
Summary: bootstrap fails with "multiple definition of
'__cpu_indicator_init'"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65970
Bug ID: 65970
Summary: [C++14] Endless loop with constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65969
Bug ID: 65969
Summary: typename allowed in using declaration of non-types
names
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri May 1 18:47:55 2015
New Revision: 222700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-05-01 Paolo Carlini
Prathamesh Kulharni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri May 1 18:43:40 2015
New Revision: 222699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222699&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-05-01 Paolo Carlini
Prathamesh Kulharni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65968
Bug ID: 65968
Summary: Failure to remove casts, cause poor code generation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65967
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65967
Bug ID: 65967
Summary: error: unable to emulate ‘XF’
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65966
Bug ID: 65966
Summary: "sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind
try_block" when initializing a 2D array
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65964
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65965
Bug ID: 65965
Summary: Straight-line memcpy/memset not vectorized when
equivalent loop is
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #31 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23)
> The patch looks pretty obvious to me - though I wonder if archives still
> work on x86_64-linux after it (or rather I wonder how they worked before...).
>
> I'm n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65959
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
--- Comment #4 from Marcus Kool ---
> movl%edi, -12(%rsp)
> vpxor %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm1
> vmovd -12(%rsp), %xmm0
> xorl%eax, %eax
> vpshufb %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
The xorl instruction is part of an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65959
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
Author: schwab
Date: Fri May 1 14:07:51 2015
New Revision: 222682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Summary: Mark help string in DEFPARAM as no-c-format
PR translation/659
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65964
Bug ID: 65964
Summary: [meta] Operand Shortening
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
--- Comment #3 from Marcus Kool ---
Created attachment 35436
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35436&action=edit
example code to show code generation on AVX platform (avx.c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
Marcus Kool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Summary|use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri May 1 13:24:16 2015
New Revision: 222680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222680&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/65476
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_assemble_integer)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #25 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #24)
> I wonder if the above code is valid Fortran.
y is not associated, so not suitable for passing as ARRAY argument to LBOUND:
ARRAY
shall be an array of an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697
--- Comment #49 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #43)
> (In reply to torvald from comment #37)
> > (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #35)
> > > So by the strict letter of the specification, no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65958
--- Comment #2 from Felix Janda ---
Actually I can hit this issue also with sh4 and microblaze. The test
program needs to be modified slightly:
int main(void)
{
char *p;
if(1) {
char i[48];
p = __b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65963
Bug ID: 65963
Summary: Missed vectorization of loads strided with << when
equivalent * succeeds
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962
Bug ID: 65962
Summary: Missed vectorization of strided stores
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962
--- Comment #1 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I believe this is a known issue, but have not identified an existing PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Reduced test
module tst
implicit none
contains
subroutine bar (a, b, n, m)
integer, dimension(:), allocatable, intent(inout) :: a
integer, dimension(:), pointer, intent(inout) :: b
i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65958
Anthony G. Basile changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||basile at opensource dot
dyc.edu
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
Bug ID: 65961
Summary: ice in vect_is_simple_use_1 with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454
--- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse ---
VRP could still do better:
typedef unsigned short T;
T f(T x, T y){
// Avoid narrowing in the front-end
int ix=x;
int iy=y;
T z=ix%iy;
int iz=z;
return z%iy;
}
ix and iy both have range [0, 65535]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65904
jules at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
--- Comment #4 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm. Yes. Well, x * 16 = x << 4, of course. Or, in theory something like VRP
could let us see that
# i_12 = PHI
# ivtmp_18 = PHI
_5 = (long unsigned int) i_12;
_6 = _5 * 16;
_7 = pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
--- Comment #3 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes you are right, we have no V2DI multiply. We do have V2DI shifts + add,
however, which would work well for some constants, e.g. the multiply by 16 in
PR/65952; perhaps the vectorizer does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #31 from Frédéric Buclin ---
(ignore this one as well)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #30 from Frédéric Buclin ---
(I added some debug code to Bugzilla to try to understand what's wrong. Just
ignore this email.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #30 from Rainer Emrich ---
I'm testing the following instead:
Index: gcc/lto-wrapper.c
===
--- gcc/lto-wrapper.c (Revision 222611)
+++ gcc/lto-wrapper.c (Arbeitskopi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65960
Bug ID: 65960
Summary: ICE in Cilk spawn with argument with non-trivial
constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65959
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
I only noticed this because GNU gettext complains that I must not translate %p
to %W.
Error: 'msgstr' is not a valid C format string, unlike 'msgid'. Reason: In the
directive number 1, the character 'W' is no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60198
Hans Vandierendonck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hvdieren at elis dot ugent.be
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65959
Bug ID: 65959
Summary: plain text incorrectly marked as format-c
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: transla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #23 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #22)
> Program aborted. Backtrace:
> #0 0x3FF95D8B973
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_9.f90 -O execution test
Thanks for the report! Before we can proceed, please send u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #22 from Andreas Schwab ---
Program aborted. Backtrace:
#0 0x3FF95D8B973
FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_9.f90 -O execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65898
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
62 matches
Mail list logo
