https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #30 from Rainer Emrich <rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de> ---
I'm testing the following instead:
Index: gcc/lto-wrapper.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/lto-wrapper.c (Revision 222611)
+++ gcc/lto-wrapper.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -934,12 +934,9 @@ run_gcc (unsigned argc, char *argv[])
filename[p - argv[i]] = '\0';
file_offset = (off_t) loffset;
}
- fd = open (argv[i], O_RDONLY);
+ fd = open (argv[i], O_RDONLY|O_BINARY);
if (fd == -1)
- {
- lto_argv[lto_argc++] = argv[i];
- continue;
- }
+ continue;
if (find_and_merge_options (fd, file_offset, LTO_SECTION_NAME_PREFIX,
&fdecoded_options, &fdecoded_options_count,
