http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47368
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Bloc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47256
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Tian 2011-01-20
05:28:17 UTC ---
hi, anyone got a chance to take a look?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47372
Summary: [x32] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at
simplify-rtx.c:5222
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47371
Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/headmerge-[12].c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47370
Summary: error: invalid first operand of MEM_REF
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47369
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-20
02:25:09 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jan 20 02:25:06 2011
New Revision: 169047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169047
Log:
Allow ptr_mode for symbolic operand with PIC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47369
Summary: [x32] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at
recog.c:2109
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47368
Summary: CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET, profiledbootstrap and lto-bootstrap
flags unused in libstdc++-v3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41619
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #16 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-20 00:13:36 UTC ---
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca wrote:
> Here is abs-1.c.000i.cgraph:
The above call graph indicates main_test is not called. Here is
main.c.000i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47367
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-19
23:13:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 23037
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23037
pr47283.C
Reduced testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47366
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing
REG_EH_REGION note in the end of bb 3 with
-fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47291
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47291
--- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-19
22:58:03 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Jan 19 22:57:47 2011
New Revision: 169036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169036
Log:
Fix PR c++/47291
gcc/
PR c++/47291
* dwar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-19
22:45:20 UTC ---
> I have to say it won't be very RM:y to proactively unfix two bugs just because
> it's reload, given two separate fixes...
Well, the second is still not fixed as of this writing, th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47365
Summary: [4.5 Regression] wrong code with -O -ftree-pre
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47034
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-19
22:08:00 UTC ---
Cf. also
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/808e9fca919694d7#
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-19
22:07:16 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Jan 19 22:07:14 2011
New Revision: 169035
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169035
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/46240
* tree-into-ssa.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46900
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-19
22:00:09 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Jan 19 22:00:00 2011
New Revision: 169034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169034
Log:
PR debug/47079
PR debug/46724
* function.c (ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-19
22:00:08 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Jan 19 22:00:00 2011
New Revision: 169034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169034
Log:
PR debug/47079
PR debug/46724
* function.c (inst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-19
21:38:37 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jan 19 21:38:32 2011
New Revision: 169032
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169032
Log:
Properly handle Pmode != ptr_mode when expan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47211
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-19 21:30:38
UTC ---
Created attachment 23034
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23034
different crash
This crashes with different message:
$ gcc -fms-extensions pr47211-2.C
pr47211-2.C:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
foo.i -quiet -dumpbase foo.i -mx32 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64
-auxbase-strip foo.s -O2 -version -o foo.s
GNU C (GCC) version 4.6.0 20110119 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1-4), GMP version
4.3.2, MPFR version 2.4.2, MPC version 0.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47291
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47312
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47208
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47207
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47206
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47199
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-19
20:53:19 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jan 19 20:53:14 2011
New Revision: 169029
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169029
Log:
Convert to Pmode if needed in ix86_legitimiz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47198
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47193
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-19
20:44:27 UTC ---
> I know this is sort of a contrived case but seems that gfortran is getting
> confused in this case leading to syntactically invalid assembler.
I don't see the invalid assembl
ram: /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/cc1
-fpreprocessed l.i -quiet -dumpbase l.i -mx32 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64
-auxbase-strip l.s -O -version -fPIC -o l.s
GNU C (GCC) version 4.6.0 20110119 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.5.1 20100924 (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46890
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org|froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-01-19
20:30:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> the first one wasn't a regression and fixing the second may well
> cause a third to pop up, you never know with reload. This is called RM...
FWIW,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41619
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Known to fail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36104
--- Comment #12 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-01-19
20:00:52 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Wed Jan 19 20:00:47 2011
New Revision: 169021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169021
Log:
2011-01-19 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-19
19:45:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 23033
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23033
pr46807.ii
Even further reduced testcase (and this time one that compiles without errors
with g++ 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-19
19:44:44 UTC ---
> I don't see how this makes any sense. We've identified two bugs in reload,
> both
> leading to incorrect code, and you'd rather revert the fix for one than fix
> both?
Yes, becaus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47363
Summary: value-profile.c produces incorrect error message when
*count > *all
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-01-19
19:31:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Please consider reverting the reload change on the branch. I don't think we
> want to keep fiddling with reload there.
I don't see how this makes any sen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|substring with len_trim in |wrong string length with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44415
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41146
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46130
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-19
17:38:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 23031
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23031
gcc46-pr46130.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47362
Summary: genconstants.c:68: undefined reference to `_
__chkstk_ms' on 01/15/2011 snapshot
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47167
--- Comment #9 from Martin Reinecke 2011-01-19
17:26:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Can you check if the following patch solves your problem?
Yes, this patch gets performance back to normal on the 4.5 branch and on trunk.
Great!
> The di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47361
Summary: ICE: in build_abbrev_table, at dwarf2out.c:10477 with
-g -feliminate-dwarf2-dups
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46911
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-19
17:10:31 UTC ---
We already do
/* We re-compute BLOCK_SUBBLOCKS of our parent here instead
of streaming it. For non-BLOCK BLOCK_SUPERCONTEXTs we still
stream the child relationship exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46130
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-19
16:59:59 UTC ---
Yet another testcase:
extern int bar (int);
static int foo (int x)
{
int z, w;
if (x <= 1024)
{
z = 16;
w = 17;
}
else
{
bar (bar (bar (bar (bar (b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46911
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-19
16:55:55 UTC ---
Yeah, all the inlines should be BLOCK_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN of some BLOCK that is
being streamed, so in theory all of them should be already streamed, just
DECL_INITIAL is not filled in.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46911
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-19
16:53:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> When dwarf2out_abstract_function is called on MAIN__, it doesn't have
> DECL_INITIAL set when in lto1 (compared to f951), the BLOCK tree is simply not
> p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46900
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
--- Comment #41 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-01-19 16:40:15 UTC ---
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, igaztanaga at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
>
> --- Comment #40 from Ion Gaztañaga 2011-01-19
> 16:07:01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #34 from Michael Matz 2011-01-19 16:39:30
UTC ---
> As I said in comment #27, gfc_component structs belonging to the type, they
> are shared between target and non-target variants. Thus one cannot set
> inherited target attributes on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46101
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45251
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47167
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
--- Comment #40 from Ion Gaztañaga 2011-01-19
16:07:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> The point with the case in question is that a pointer to a global
> object is computed relative to the address _of an automatic variable_.
> I hope no stan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47360
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-19
15:58:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Found at
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/bbaf59ffd7c372e9#
> (There is another issue in that thread)
The other iss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47360
Summary: GENERIC with proc-pointer components as specific
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47303
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47303
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-19
15:37:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 19 15:36:57 2011
New Revision: 169000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169000
Log:
PR c++/47303
* decl2.c (finish_anon_union):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47337
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47337
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-19
15:13:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 19 15:13:01 2011
New Revision: 168997
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168997
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/47337
* dce.c (check_ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47167
--- Comment #7 from Martin Reinecke 2011-01-19
14:16:18 UTC ---
OK, I located the problematic commit, at least on the 4.5 branch: it's revision
number 167492 (fix for PR tree-optimization/46806).
Between revisions 167491 and 167492 the CPU time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-19 13:27:34
UTC ---
Created attachment 23029
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23029
more reduced testcase
$ gcc -O -fipa-cp -fipa-cp-clone testcase.C
testcase.C: In function 'void foo()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45342
--- Comment #3 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-01-19
13:09:56 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Wed Jan 19 13:09:51 2011
New Revision: 168992
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168992
Log:
PR testsuite/45342
* gcc.dg/tls/thr-cse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47351
--- Comment #4 from Jeremy 2011-01-19 13:06:41 UTC
---
Done. I can report that the problem does not occur with GCC 4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
--- Comment #6 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-01-19
12:56:19 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Wed Jan 19 12:56:16 2011
New Revision: 168990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168990
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46021
* gcc.dg/tre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-19
12:48:57 UTC ---
>From what I have seen, it's pass_cleanup_eh removing an SSA
(names$_storage_94) name that is still being referenced in the IL (as
a parameter to zfree).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46890
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44415
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-19
12:01:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] gmp multilib support broke bootstrap with
> static
> libgmp
>
> > --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38292
--- Comment #14 from Matthias Klose 2011-01-19
11:53:54 UTC ---
no, normal python build fails too, this is reported as bug #47271.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38292
--- Comment #13 from Matthias Klose 2011-01-19
11:43:30 UTC ---
trying to build python 3.2~rc1, I run into:
I get (with the just built python (built with -fprofile-generate):
build-static$ ./python
XXX lineno: 1101, opcode: 0
Fatal Python error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
Summary: Recursive functions of intrinsic names generates
invalid assembler
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-19
10:49:04 UTC ---
So you ran out of stack-space during garbage collecting. A not uncommon
problem. As you can reproduce it you now need to identify the chain
that is walked and see if we can avoid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47351
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-19
10:47:25 UTC ---
Can you try a more recent release from the 4.5 branch, like 4.5.1 or 4.5.2?
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
