http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-19 22:45:20 UTC --- > I have to say it won't be very RM:y to proactively unfix two bugs just because > it's reload, given two separate fixes... Well, the second is still not fixed as of this writing, that's why I suggested reverting the problematic first fix in the first place. As for "just because it's reload", yes, that's precisely the point; patching reload is always risky.
