http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-19 20:30:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > the first one wasn't a regression and fixing the second may well > cause a third to pop up, you never know with reload. This is called RM... FWIW, you'd then be in danger of regressing 41085. I have to say it won't be very RM:y to proactively unfix two bugs just because it's reload, given two separate fixes...
