http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45879
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45879
Summary: strcpy returns unexpected result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45822
Rion changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rion4ik at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from Rion
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35967
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35891
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45876
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45702
--- Comment #21 from John David Anglin 2010-10-04
00:41:15 UTC ---
Still have the following fails on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu:
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr27898.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr28706.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr28712.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45820
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2010-10-04
00:20:06 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Oct 4 00:20:02 2010
New Revision: 164925
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164925
Log:
PR target/45820
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45877
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
Summary: Can't compile even a trivial ObjC program with
-fexceptions -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45871
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Last reconfirmed|2010-10-03 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45877
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45877
Summary: invalid write in gimplify_and_update_call_from_tree
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-03
20:39:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Btw, please don't strip CPP line notes from preprocessed source, that makes
> > un-including impossible.
>
> Two questions
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
--- Comment #3 from dcb 2010-10-03 20:22:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Btw, please don't strip CPP line notes from preprocessed source, that makes
> un-including impossible.
Two questions
1. What is un-including, please ?
2. So instead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45876
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45872
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-03
20:00:46 UTC ---
> Which release works?
157991;-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-03
19:59:11 UTC ---
Btw, please don't strip CPP line notes from preprocessed source, that makes
un-including impossible.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45874
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45860
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45861
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45869
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45871
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45872
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Component|bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
ges=c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20101003 (experimental) [trunk revision 164915] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. -O1 ~/t.i
/home/ryan/t.i: In function ‘gcLINKTREE_GenerateStates’:
/home/ryan/t.i:91:10: warning: excess elements in struct initialiser [enabled
by default]
/home/ryan/t.i:91:10: warn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
Summary: ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
ble-languages=c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20101003 (experimental) [trunk revision 164915] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. -O2 ~/ice.ii /home/ryan/ice.ii: In static member function ‘static
Status Mpeg2FrameConstructor::ParsePictureHeader(Ipp8u*, Ipp32s,
Mpeg2TrackInfo*)’:
/home/ryan/ice.ii:36:21: er
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45873
Summary: Parameter packs not expanding consistently in function
return types
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45872
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.5.3 |4.5.2
--- Comment #1 from Dominiqu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45872
Summary: [4.5 Regression] java/net/natVMInetAddress.cc:42:52:
error: declaration of C function 'int
gethostname(char*, int)' conflicts
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45871
Summary: lto bootstrap miscompiles expmed.c1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43414
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
--- Comment #15 from Frédéric Buclin 2010-10-03
13:09:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Frédéric, do you know what happened to the mangled URLs in this PR?
Yes, this string has been linkified twice. First because the GCC extension
detected
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45513
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||longb at cray dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42042
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-03
12:01:16 UTC ---
Could this pr be related to pr45585?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45752
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||LpSolit at netscape dot net
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-03
10:12:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
>
> Is this a bugzilla bug?
It seems so, since I can make it happen again.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
--- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-03
10:11:26 UTC ---
The output of GCC is not designed to be parsed by IDEs:
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19165
nor is GCC designed to be tightly integrated with an IDE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-03
09:50:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> The output of GCC is not designed to be parsed by IDEs:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/��0��
As an aside, what happened to that URL?
It looks fine here:
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-03
09:22:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> What is the time frame for 4.6.0?
We are still in Stage 1, but I don't have many details at the moment, I would
suggest simply following the various announc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45216
Kai Henningsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kai.extern at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #8 from rus at google dot com 2010-10-03 07:40:42 UTC ---
Hello Paolo,
Thank you for the notification. It's *much* easier to use debug mode as a
template than to start from scratch.
What is the time frame for 4.6.0?
For reference, w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #7 from rus at google dot com 2010-10-03 07:06:26 UTC ---
Hello Paolo,
Thank you for the notification. It's *much* easier to use debug mode as a
template than to start from scratch.
What is the time frame for 4.6.0?
For reference, w
54 matches
Mail list logo
