iNGYEN LETOLTES!

2008-02-16 Thread pawel
Szia! Emlékszel amikor arról beszéltem hogy meg fog nyílni Magyarország legjobb letöltõ oldala? Na, ha igen, akkor itt a link. Jó szorakozást! :) http://href.hu/x/4pnj

Re: gcc 4.6 release date

2011-01-17 Thread Pawel Sikora
On Monday 17 of January 2011 11:49:04 Richard Guenther wrote: > 2011/1/16 Mehmet Sinan Şahin : > > Hi, > > > > When do you plan to release gcc 4.6? > > When it's ready. will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account? i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x featur

Re: gcc 4.6 release date

2011-01-17 Thread Pawel Sikora
On Monday 17 of January 2011 16:32:32 Jonathan Wakely wrote: > 2011/1/17 Pawel Sikora : > > > > will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account? > > i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x features in my code base > > with 4.5 a

Can help with task of language frontend cleanup

2021-03-25 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
those two tasks we will gains some modularity maintainability better architecture and more on par with llvm/clang features. Ps. Gcc target list is great. Love and respect it. Best regards, Pawel Kunio

Re: Can help with task of language frontend cleanup

2021-03-26 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
and sync those two projects. Best regards, Pawel Kunio czw., 25.03.2021, 13:06 użytkownik Jonathan Wakely napisał: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 09:43, pawel k. via Gcc-help > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Not sure which list is right. I have ideas for code improvement for gcc

My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-27 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
. It looks ambitious but doable. If so, my another question would be whether no matter configure flags, when for example x86 is selected as target, genned target code is always same. Best regards, Pawel Kunio

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-27 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Hmm, Thanks. Not sure I can see answer from him. Ill recheck it. Best regards, Pawel Kunio niedz., 28.03.2021, 01:27 użytkownik Jonathan Wakely napisał: > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 2021, 23:38 pawel k. via Gcc, wrote: > >> Hello, >> I would like to ask whether there

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-28 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Hello, Yea ok got it. Ill reply. I dont get email notifications from him. Ill prepare reply asap as of what we can or cannot do and what will be costs and benefits. Then he/you can decide. Best regards, Pawel niedz., 28.03.2021, 11:34 użytkownik Jonathan Wakely napisał: > > > On Su

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-28 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
less chaotic. If theres demand on researching and hopefully implementing any of these, please let me know. Best regards, Pawel Kunio niedz., 28.03.2021, 11:34 użytkownik Jonathan Wakely napisał: > > > On Sun, 28 Mar 2021, 02:20 pawel k., wrote: > >> Hmm, >> Thanks. Not sur

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-04-13 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
what i say doesnt make much sense, please also let me know. Best regards, Pawel kunio pon., 29.03.2021, 19:25 użytkownik Joseph Myers napisał: > On Sun, 28 Mar 2021, pawel k. via Gcc wrote: > > > Hello, > > I would like to ask whether there would be interest in the project

On rms controversy

2021-04-13 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
. -last but not least all far left snowflakes of you assuming guilt and barring one from defence, please f off and f you for now. -possibly some of you wanted to steal his project so as per above big f off and f you. That would be it. Best regards, Pawel kunio

Re: On rms controversy

2021-04-14 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 13:38, David Malcolm wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 08:01 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, 07:50 pawel k. via Gcc, wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [...snip...] > > > > > Very logical a

Re: On rms controversy

2021-04-14 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Wakely napisał: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 15:10, pawel k. wrote: > > > > Thank You Jonathan for your very valuable opinions. I was sure the more > far lefty you are the less you will understand me, if my assumptions about > your worldviews are correct. If not apologies. Ill

Fsf decision

2021-04-16 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Hello, I somehow got the feeling the truth and reason have won although there were many odds against them. https://www.fsf.org/news/statement-of-fsf-board-on-election-of-richard-stallman Big thanks and congratulations to fsf board and rms himself. Wonder what wokistanis gonna do now. Wonder whet

Re: Fsf decision

2021-04-16 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Hello, Sorry for lags but im across the pond. Thanks for bearing with me. Spot on emphasis. Yes agree with you fully BOTH rms and his opponents should watch the tongues a little more possibly if goodwilled towards fsf to make my point weakest. Albeit the weight of guilt of theirs looks slightly bi