On Monday 17 of January 2011 16:32:32 Jonathan Wakely wrote: > 2011/1/17 Pawel Sikora : > > > > will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account? > > i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x features in my code base > > with 4.5 and would be nice to have 4.6 with the same c++0x subset working. > > You can look at the priority field in bugzilla. If they have priority > P1 then it means they should be fixed before 4.6 can be released e.g. > PR 47067. If they aren't P1 (or there is no PR) then they won't block > the release.
i think about these 3 regressions: Bug 46552 - [4.6 Regression][C++0x] Internal compiler error on pointer to member variable with template. Bug 47311 - [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502. Bug 47317 - [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in fixed_type_or_null. they have P3 prio but afaics the P1/P2 are used for serious regressions in released code. c++0x implementation is still an experimental compiler feautre. can we raise a prio for expreimental feature regression?
