Re: Mirror

Hi Alex, On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Alex Korolev wrote: > I noticed I miss few important things in the first email regarding > mirror. > > Mirror name: gcc.releasenotes.org > Mirror url: http://gcc.releasenotes.org > Location: USA, TX > Supporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I looked into this, and

ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots cleanups

I realized that our full FTP tree at ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/ consumes 27GB overall. There is ample diskspace on gcc.gnu.org itself, but for (new) mirrors this is quite a bit, for example, so I went ahead and reduced this to 18G by removing some older snapshots (from 2007 and RCs for previous re

Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > I'm curious at how many GCC developpers use non x86/_64 as their > main development machine (and how many non x86/_64 core they use). It's not just backend changes that require testing on non-x86 architectures. And it is very worthwhile to get testing

Re: 2008 GCC Summit Proceedings

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > ...expecting these documents to be put up on the gcc wiki at some point, > right? Does anybody have an ETA or know how this has worked in previous > years? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki We have been putting this under ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gnu (with ap

Re: Mirror

[ gcc -> gcc-patches ] After some off-list conversations with Alex and updates on his mirror, we now have a new full mirror of gcc.gnu.org ;-) and I am committing the patch below. Gerald Index: mirrors.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/ww

Re: how can I contribute ?

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Diego Novillo wrote: > I suggest reading the introductory material in > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GettingStarted/ And of course http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html ... Gerald

RE: GCC 3.3.3 not on GNU servers...

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Dave Korn wrote: >>> I was looking for GCC 3.3.3 just now, and noticed that it doesn't >>> exist on the generic GNU FTP server or its mirrors >>> (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc for example). 3.3.2 and 3.3.4 are there, >>> as well as lots of other releases, but 3.3.3 is mysteriousl

RE: GCC 3.3.3 not on GNU servers...

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Dave Korn wrote: >>>> I was looking for GCC 3.3.3 just now, and noticed that it doesn't >>>> exist on the generic GNU FTP server or its mirrors >>>> (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc for exampl

Re: [patch] Packager files

Joshua Sumali wrote: > Attached patch puts files aot-compile-rm, aot-compile, and > rebuild-gcj-db into libjava/contrib. These files are taken from > java-gcj-compat and are intended to be available for packagers. This > is the second part of merging java-gcj-compat into libgcj (also see > sdk st

Re: Web page additon

Hi Walter, On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Walter Spector wrote: > On the web page: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html > > For the "SGI" line, you may also add Nekochan: > > http://www.nekochan.net/downloads.php > > Nekochan has newer versions of GNU software than the SGI site has.

Re: GCC 4.1 branch closed

Hi Joseph, On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > The GCC 4.1 branch is now closed and should have no further commits. All > open bugs at the 4.1.3 milestone, or marked as [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 > Regression] or similar, have been updated accordingly. I wonder, could/should this also become a

Re: [tuples] Jakub is now branch maintainer

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Diego Novillo wrote: > You've been doing great work on the branch, so Aldy and I think that > you don't really need patch approval for branch patches anymore. So, > from now on, feel free to commit your patches without waiting for an > explicit approval. Hear, hear. ;-) Do y

Re: [WWW] Updating GCC Links and Selected Readings

Thanks for taking the time to update this, Santiago! Let me ask our Ada maintainers to have a look as well, since this is not exactly my area of expertise. Geert/Robert/Arnaud, I'll be happy to apply that patch and make some tweaks based on your review. Gerald On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Santiago Urue

Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org?

Except for wwwdocs, that is? As I mentioned before, I'd love to get wwwdocs converted to SVN, and in the course of this I noticed some historic configurations which I believe aren't be used any more and haven't, for years. Unless I hear to the contrary, I plan on removing these with the patch bel

Re: [WWW] Updating GCC Links and Selected Readings

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > Yes, the suggested changes are good. Thanks for the review, Arnaud, and thanks again for the patch, Santiago! I committed this with minor formatting changes and fixed some markup issues directly afterwards. Gerald

Recent warning regression: no return statement in function returning non-void

I believe the following happened in the last 48 or so hours; I saw this triggered by my nightly Wine builds which in turn use my nightly GCC builds. ;-) For code like the following where we have an infinite loop in a non-void function, we now (incorrectly) issue a warning with all of -O0, -O1 and

Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Dennis Clarke wrote: > hold on .. on the NEWS page I see ... okay .. how very user friendly. > Sort of the thing one would put on the project homepage I would think. See how user friendly we in GCC-land are in comparison? ;-) Gerald

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: New mirror GCC at FPT Telecom

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We have set up a new mirror. This is our information: > > URL: >- http://mirror-fpt-telecom.fpt.net/gcc/ >- ftp://mirror-fpt-telecom.fpt.net/mirror/gcc/ > > Location: >- Company: FPT Telecom >- City: HoChiMinh >- Country: Viet Na

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> I've been waiting until I had the time to rewrite my import with proper >> author names. Does anyone have a correspondence file mapping the login >> name to Author? > I have a list that is about 4 months old. Should be pretty complete. Cute. How abo

Re: Please, do not use the merged revisions log as the commit message when merging

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008, John Freeman wrote: > No one informed me of any commit policies when I was given subversion > access. I thought that since I was working on a branch, I had free > reign. Education would go a long way in preventing future errors. You are right. This is one of the weaknesse

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I don't think adding YA place that has to be updated when things change > is a good idea. If this is a script that runs on gcc.gnu.org then you > should be able to get the full name with a minimal amount of effort > using a getpw* function. Okay, I

Re: Please, do not use the merged revisions log as the commit message when merging

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > It should be on svnwrite.html Something like the following? (Not committed yet.) Gerald Index: svnwrite.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svnwrite.html,v retrieving revision 1.

Re: Who broke bootstrap!

On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Steve Kargl wrote: > checking for i386-unknown-freebsd8.0-gcc... > /usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/./gcc/ > -B/usr/home/kargl/work/i386-unknown-freebsd8.0/bin/ > -B/usr/home/kargl/work/i386-unknown-freebsd8.0/lib/ -isystem > /usr/home/kargl/work

Re: gcc 4.3.0, -Wconversion and conditional operator

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > This should be fixed in any recent GCC 4.4. snapshot. But I cannot > test it myself to be sure, if someone would be so kind to check this > for me, I would appreciate it. Confirmed on i386-unknown-freebsd6.3 using soures as of 20 hours ago. Gerald

Re: New wiki page on testing compile times and memory usage

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Diego Novillo wrote: > I've added a collection of scripts that I have gathered over time to > test compile time and memory usage when making changes to the compiler. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/PerformanceTesting Nice, thanks for sharing these. How about the patch below? Ge

Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)

On Sat, 12 May 2007, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > Whoops. It looks like this: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00449.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00476.html > > never got checked in to the 4.2 changes document. Indeed. I took Jason's excellent description and com

Re: I don't understand some of gcc-4.1-20070514, a patch here.

On Sat, 19 May 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > If this message doesn't appear in gcc@gcc.gnu.org and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] as in this subject then > they are censuring me and yours. Please stop this nonsense, and find yourself a different playground from the GCC lists. Gerald

[wwwdocs PATCH] RE: gcc-4.2 manuals: GNU OpenMP Manual?

On Thu, 17 May 2007, Dave Korn wrote: >> Should section "GCC 4.2.0 manuals" of >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ >> >> not also list the "GNU OpenMP Manual" that is available for 4.2? > Yes, it probably should. The released docs have been prepared correctly: > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedo

Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?

On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Ben Elliston wrote: >> Are they mentioned in any gcc changes.html? > No, they're not. They probably should be. Do you think we could talk the submitters/maintainers into donating a patch? :-) Gerald

Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, H. J. Lu wrote: >> Support for the decimal floating point C extension could be mentioned >> in the release notes for GCC 4.2, but there it's only supported for >> powerpc*-linux and x86*-linux and only if requested at configure time. >> The ABI for powerpc*-linux has changed sin

Re: gcc-4.3-20070707 is now available

In case anyone wonders about this extra snapshot: both this week's, and last week's snapshot were broken in that a complete bootstrap failed even on i386, so I manually triggered another one. Gerald

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC 4.1 status on front page

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The link on gcc.gnu.org for the GCC 4.1 status refers to an email about > GCC 4.2 Thanks for this report. I did some digging (to find the correct link), and it seems this was introduced with revision 1.619 of index.html. This patch restores the lat

Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer

On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Tom Tromey wrote: > In this case the library has to follow the external project policy: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00558.html > > It at least needs an entry on the "coding conventions" page. Good point. HJ, would you mind updating our coding conventions pag

Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, H.J. Lu wrote: > Here is a patch. We are working on an external libbid open source > website. I will update it when it is up and running. Thanks! I believe you'd ment the first sentence to read "The master sources come from the Intel BID library..."? The patch is fine with t

Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Diego Novillo wrote: > I've always found the term Non-Autopoiesis too pretentious and > unnecessarily complex. In a recent thread, Tobias Schluter proposed > Non-autonomous, which is at least more readily understandable. Disclaimer: I am writing this in my capacity as non-nat

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Phil Edwards wrote: > Putting gcc-help as the first address mentioned in lists.html is a > good idea. That's a good idea. Done thusly. Gerald Index: lists.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/lists.html,v

Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: > This part of the documentation is fragmented in a way such that I > sometimes can't find what I'm looking for, even if I know it is there > (somewhere). For example, when it comes to submitting patches, we have > http://gcc.gnu.org/codingcon

Re: "Proceedings of the GCC Developers' Summit" now available

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Diego Novillo wrote: >> Why not provide a permanent home for the GCC summit proceedings at >> gcc.gnu.org? It seems the logical place. > That's what I've done. The .pdf is *in* gcc.gnu.org. The others could > be sucked in as well. They're now pointing to gccsummit. Current

Re: New download mirror

Hi Max, On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Max Bear wrote: > I just add a new mirror. The server is located at US (Dallas, 100mb > connection). I am doing daily upate on this mirror. Here is the url: > > http://gcc.site2nd.org/gcc/ > > It's a little thing that I can do to contribute to the community. > > If y

Bootstrap failure (on FreeBSD)

I have been getting the following for a couple of days, but it seems nobody else is seeing this? This is on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine which has been bootstrapping mainline for months w/o problems, apart from the usual short-lived breakages: libtool: compile: /usr/nabil-files/pfeifer/OBJ-0907-2228/./

Re: Bootstrap failure (on FreeBSD)

On Sat, 8 Sep 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Rerun the command without the ">/dev/null 2>&1", libtool likes to say > that PIC mode will give the same output as non PIC mode (which is not > always true). Blind me. Obviously that redirection removed all traces of the real error. Ahem. Thanks, Andre

RE: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent??

On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Dave Korn wrote: > On 04 September 2007 10:05, me wrote: >> The point of this is that __COUNTER__ would assign consecutive numbers > >> I can not find g++'s equivalent & wonder how I could achieve the same >> thing? > This feature was just added recently. It will be in all upco

Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work

Vladimir, On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Vladimir N. Makarov wrote: > Sorry, it is even make me a bit scary becuase I don't know when the SC > decides that we need more maintainers and what maintainers. When should > we propose. After that I am just starting to think who usually propose > them. I know

Re: Bootstrap failure (on FreeBSD)

On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> [bootstrap/33352] invalid rtl sharing -- bootstrap failure compiling >> libgomp/team.c on i386 > I can definitly take alook on it, however i386-linux bootstrap fine for > me. Can I have testcase? After a couple of days of failure (at least four nightly

Re: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent??

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Tom Tromey wrote: >> Also, I recently added a new -fdirectives-only option which improves >> distcc and ccache performance. Does that merit a release note update > as well? > IMO, yes. Seconded. :-) Gerald

Re: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: >>> I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is >>> a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same >>> code independent of whether or not we're compiling with -g. >> Can the SC plea

Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option

And now to the most important issue of all to address before we can release GCC 4.3.0. ;-) In our current documentation we have both "command-line option" and "command line option". Like other such cases, we should make a choice and document this in codingconventions.html. I am willing to take c

[wwwdocs] Patch for RE: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Dave Korn wrote: > Hyphenated. It's not a line option of a command, it's an option of a > command-line. On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > As an adjective I think it should be "command-line"; I'm sure Sandra will > correct me if I'm wrong here. On Mon, 17 Sep 200

Re: September entry on mailing list pages broken

On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Volker Reichelt wrote: > the starting pages for the mailing lists like > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc or http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches > are broken. To be more precise, the entry generated for September is > corrupted: It shows a strange size, and the link points to a wrong l

Re: MetaHTML and the GCC web site

Hi FX, On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, François-Xavier Coudert wrote: > how was metahtml compiled for the current webserver (the error I see > is certainly not target-specific), and should we use a tool that has > been deceased for 8 years to produce our website? let me provide a bit of historical backgroun

Re: MetaHTML and the GCC web site

On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > As others noted, MetaHTML can be made to work on a current GNU/Linux > system, and while this probably will not be our long term strategy, I > am trying to brush up my scripts/patches that will allow for this more > easily and then share t

Re: gcc-4.2-20071011 is now available

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Snapshot gcc-4.2-20071011 is now available on > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20071011/ > and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. I ran this script manually and reenabled the generation of snapshots off th

Re: Add a symlink for each branch in online docs

On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, François-Xavier Coudert wrote: > The documentation for different releases of GCC in the same branch > vary only slightly. For that reason, I think it would be nice to be > able to have a URL for "the doc of a given branch", meaning "the doc > of the last released version of this

Re: [RFC,wwwdocs] Ditch MetaHTML and use our own Perl preprocessor

[ Omitting gcc-patches ] On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > I think that if indeed metahtml is in such a bad shape as you > describe, moving away from it asap is the right thing to do. But I'm > not convinced that developing a gcc.gnu.org-specific template engine > is the correct answer

Re: gcc mirror

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I estabilished an http mirror via rsync, updated four times a day with a > cron job, located in Utah (US), available at the URL > "http://gcc.bigsearcher.com/";, from my server bigsearcher.com; > Please add this mirror to the list of available mirror

Re: Removal of pre-ISO C++ items from include/backwards

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > 'deprecated' in the standard does not carry much semantics weight, > unless the feature is also removed. But, even then we would have to > worry about existing codes that were written using the feature. I have to admit I am also surprised about the u

Re: Removal of pre-ISO C++ items from include/backwards

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Well technically these headers have been deprecated since at least 3.2 > (maybe even back in 3.0) with them producing a warning. So I don't > know if we should move them or not but we have followed our own rules > here. Sorry, I misread the Subject: wha

Re: Infinite loop in compiling javax/swing/text/html/parser/HTML_401F.list

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, David Daney wrote: > You need at least 256MB of memory to compile HTML_401F. A lot of time > is also useful. If the system is not thrashing, I would give it a > couple of hours before calling it broken. Have we reduced memory consumption recently? On i386-freebsd the number

Re: Infinite loop in compiling javax/swing/text/html/parser/HTML_401F.list

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Richard Guenther wrote: >> Don't be sorry, I can reproduce a compilation time surge for libjava on >> my machine (AMD64, 2.4 GHz, 1 GB). In particular, HTML_401F.o now >> takes 40 min to compile for each version of the library. >> >> The surge comes from the fix for PR tree-

Re: Infinite loop in compiling javax/swing/text/html/parser/HTML_401F.list

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, David Daney wrote: >> On i386-freebsd the number I identified earlier this year was 700MB, >> 512MB definitely _not_ being sufficient. I'd be very interested in >> your measurements, perhaps we can reduce the limit somewhat! > I regularly bootstrap c,c++,java on a mips-linu

Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Jason Merrill wrote: > I think I prefer Richard's suggestion of not branching until we're ready to > make the .0 release. The effect should be the same except that people don't > have to deal with checking patches in on the branch vs. the trunk until after > 4.3.0 goes out. I

Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Richard Guenther wrote: > Well, there are installable gcc 4.3 builds for openSUSE available, > and I know of at least Debian packages in experimental. I wouldn't > be surprised if Fedora also has gcc 4.3 packages ready. FreeBSD also has packages (and of course the source ports

Re: What means the fat .gch file?

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > What is there inside of fat .gch file? What means the .gch file? This is a question for the gcc-help list, not gcc. The latter is for the development *of* GCC, not the development *with* GCC. You can easily find the answer to your question by Googling fo

Re: Any Ada changes for GCC 4.3?

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Britt Snodgrass wrote: > I've noticed that the GCC changes pages > (http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/changes.html and > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html ) are not usually updated for > Ada and/or GNAT. It anyone designated as a maintainer for this? Yes, Geert, Robert, and Arn

Re: RFC: Creating a live, all-encompassing architectural document for GCC

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Diego Novillo wrote: > So, I think the problem goes a bit beyond mere documentation of how a > module works at a high level. I would like to have a navigable > document that also describes the flow of things, interfaces and > helpers. Starting at main.c:main() and ending at t

Re: GNAT is required to build ada

On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Arnaud Charlet wrote: >> configure: error: GNAT is required to build ada > Yes, that's the expected and documented behavior. Jack, we tried to write this down in the step-by-step instructions you'll find at . Is there anything we could do to improv

Re: undocumented optimization options

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Janis Johnson wrote: > -fipa-cp steven > -fipa-matrix-reorg razya > -fipa-pure-const zadeck (enabled with -O) > -fipa-referencezadeck (enabled with -O) > -fipa-type-escape zadeck > -fvar-tracking-uninit ctice > > Is there a po

[wwwdocs] PATCH Re: Optimization of conditional access to globals: thread-unsafe?

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> I don't have access to the POSIX standard itself > See . Now added to our "Links and Selected Readings" page; thanks for the pointer, Andreas! Gerald Index: readings.html

Idea to refine -Wtype-limits

-Wtype-limits guards a very useful, in my experience, set of warnings including the following: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true Based on these I identified and fixed several real bugs in Wine so far a

Status of the DLX backend for GCC?

At http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/extensions.html we have a reference to the DLX port of GCC, which corresponds to the DLX machine described in "Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach" by Hennessy and Patterson. Sadly, the link to http://www-mount.ee.umn.edu/~okeefe/mcerg/gcc-dlx.html d

Re: Status of the DLX backend for GCC?

Hi Nikolaos, On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Over the previous years, I had downloaded and used both a really archaic > gcc-1.09 DLX backend as well as the one you refer too. They are both in > a sad state of affairs, but the gcc-2.7.2.1 (AFAICR) was usable. do you have a workin

Re: What is a regression?

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: > [...] I realized that the documentation we currently have up at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html was partly incorrect (only listing P1 to P2) and certainly quite incomplete, so I tried to cast my understanding and what I found in this thread int

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Gfortran annual report for 2008

On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Paul Thomas wrote: > Gfortran maintainers have kept up the momentum of 2006 and the number > of known F95 bugs has gone down sharply, the diagnostic capability > has increased and new F2003/8 features added. Nice report, thanks! Like last year I add a link to this message to t

Re: What is a regression?

On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Mark Mitchell wrote: > I think that's an appropriate patch, for now. I've had some offline > discussions about other changes we might want to make, but let's capture > the current state. Exactly. That was my thinking. :-) If we want to make any updates to our processes, I'

Re: Should we move the --param documention to gccint?

On Fri, 8 Nov 2024, Richard Sandiford via Gcc wrote: > We changed one of the AArch64-specific --params for GCC 14. > Unfortunately, it seems that a lot of people were relying on the > previous behaviour. Umpf. > Every --param is documented in the user-facing manual, so it's not > surprising that

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Tamar Christina wrote: > FWIW, Even though I was one of those that really liked and wanted this > documentation update to sphinx, I agree with removing them as it is just > confusing or misleading to users at this point. > > I do hope that in the future we could try to moderni

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The HTML pages from Martin Liska's Sphinx doc experiment are still > online, and Google thinks they are the canonical locatiosn for GCC docs. ...which is really weird. I wonder what influenced Google's ranking here (all the more given that there shou

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > All these directories should have been removed two years ago: Agreed. Thank you for digging into this and raising it, Jonathan! > $ ls -1 -d htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/*/ > htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/c-implementation-defined-behavior/ > htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/ex

PATCH for Re: new mirror greece

gmail.com >>>> Sponsor Name: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki >>>> Sponsor URL : https://auth.gr >>>> HTTP/HTTPS URL: fosszone.csd.auth.gr/gnu/gcc Thank you, Konstantinos. Here is the update I made to our mirrors page. Gerald commit 1b564590

Re: gcc-wwwdocs branch python-formatting created. e1e17c97a8ae35cfb6b2f7428fb52b05f82450d1

On Sun, 1 Dec 2024, Alexander Monakov wrote: > You have to use the name of the branch in the remote repo, > "python-formatting": > > git push --delete origin python-formatting That did the job, thank you! On Sun, 1 Dec 2024, Mark Wielaard wrote: > I believe the correct invocation is: > > $ g

Re: gcc-wwwdocs branch python-formatting created. e1e17c97a8ae35cfb6b2f7428fb52b05f82450d1

On Fri, 23 Aug 2024, Eric Gallager wrote: >>> The branch, python-formatting has been created >>> at e1e17c97a8ae35cfb6b2f7428fb52b05f82450d1 (commit) >> Hmm, are you intentionally creating a branch for the wwwdocs repository >> (i.e., our web pages)? I don't recall us having used one befor

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I think we want to remove these too: Ah, thanks for pointing these out, Jonathan! > ./gccgo/_static/ > ./gccint/_static/ > ./gdc/_static/ > ./gfc-internals/_static/ > ./gfortran/_static/ > ./gnat_rm/_static/ > ./gnat-style/_static/ > ./gnat_ugn/_static

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025, Jonathan Wakely wrote: : >> ./gnat_ugn/_static/ >> ./libgccjit/_static/ >> ./libgdiagnostics/_static/ >> ./libgomp/_static/ : > N.B. there's ./jit/_static which should stay, because jit still uses > sphinx for its docs. I noticed onlinedocs/libgccjit/_static and it's parent on

<    4   5   6   7   8   9