On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Diego Novillo wrote: > I've always found the term Non-Autopoiesis too pretentious and > unnecessarily complex. In a recent thread, Tobias Schluter proposed > Non-autonomous, which is at least more readily understandable.
Disclaimer: I am writing this in my capacity as non-native speaker, not as SC member or doc maintainer. ;-) To me "non-autonomous" has connotations of being a child, or ill, or fragile. Unfortunately, I do not really have an alternate grand proposal. Some- thing like "Not self-approving Maintainers" or "Non-self-...", perhaps? > Is anyone violently opposed to changing the category name? Not so, though. Gerald
