Re: I would like to provide a mirror for GCC

Hi Timo, On Fri, 24 May 2013, timo.ja...@go-part.com wrote: > I was wondering if you are still accepting mirrors for GCC. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html > > If you are, I will like to provide one with HTTP, FTP and Rsync access via > a VPS located in Australia, USA, UK, Philippines or Japan

Re: gcc home page

On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 26 April 2013 13:09, Jurgis Upenieks wrote: >> I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes. >> In C++ paragraph about explicit override control. >> In example code, is it really struct, not class? > Yes, that's valid C++, the exa

Re: How am I supposed to verify gcc-4.8.0 download when you provide no .sig file?...

On Wed, 8 May 2013, Larry Evans wrote: > the verification command and result are: > > ~/download/gcc/4.8 $ gpg --verify --keyring ./gnu-keyring.gpg > ./gcc-4.8.0.tar.bz2.sig > gpg: Signature made Fri Mar 22 08:32:18 2013 CDT using DSA key ID C3C45C06 > gpg: Good signature from "Jakub Jelinek " > g

Steven Bosscher appointed RTL optimizers reviewer

It's my pleasure to announce the appointment of Steven Bosscher as RTL optimizers reviewer. Congratulations and Happy Hacking, Steven! Gerald PS: Please update MAINTAINERS accordingly.

Re: Should -Wmaybe-uninitialized be included in -Wall?

On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: >> This points to other ideas: >> 1) how about adding a helper switch to show what is included in Wall? >> such as -Wall-print > > Doesn't > > gcc -Q -Wall --help=warnings > > give you this? Yes, but...how would I know to use this? For example, g

Re: Toolchain Build Robot

On Sun, 11 Aug 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > I just added a different view. All results can also be viewed as a > timeline, both per-buildhost and per-target: > > http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/timeline.php Nice! Would you like to add a reference to http://gcc.gnu.org/testing/ ?

New testsuite warnings: mkdir: plugin: File exists

Recently (three days perhaps) I started to notice the following mkdir: plugin: mkdir: plugin: File exists File exists mkdir: mkdir: testsuitetestsuite: : File exists File exists in the log excerpts of my nightly builders that I get by mail. (For successful builds the build environment is

Re: Toolchain Build Robot

On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Ok? > > Index: htdocs/testing/index.html > === > RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/testing/index.html,v > retrieving revision 1.29 > diff -u -p -r1.29 index.html > --- htdocs/testing/ind

Re: Toolchain Build Robot

On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > ...and this on top of that: > > Ok? That one, too. :-) Gerald

Dodji Seketeli appointed diagnostics framework maintainer

I am happy to announce Dodji Seketeli as diagnostics framework maintainer. Thanks for your contributions and agreeing to fill this role, Dodji! And thanks to Gaby for his contributions in this area over the years and the professional manner he has been initiating this transition (including some

Warning about __DATE__ and __TIME__

To make it easier to reproduce builds of software and entire GNU/Linux distributions, RMS had the idea of adding a warning to GCC that warns about the use of __DATE__ and __TIME__. Short of "interesting" changes to the environment or #defining these two, as soon as a program uses __DATE__ or __T

Re: Warning about __DATE__ and __TIME__

On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote: I assume that he also likes to have a warning for __TIMESTAMP__. So do I, but I asked to be sure. Do you mean something like the attached patch? (Only lightly tested.) Yep! Thanks. +@item -Wdate-time +@opindex Wdate-time +@opindex Wno-date-time

libcilkrts portability

Hi Balaji, On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > Is there anything you were thinking about that I missed? the question was in a different context, but making the code a bit more portable would be good. Right now FreeBSD bootstrap is broken due to the following in runtime/config/x86/cilk-a

libcilkrts/runtime/config/generic/cilk-abi-vla.c failure (was: [PATCH, committed] libcilkrts - Add check for availability of alloca.h (Bug Bootstrap/58918))

On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > This attached patch will check for usage of alloca.h before using it. > The change is entirely in libcilkrts and I am committing this change as > it is pretty obvious (the change was lifted from the autconf manual > example). Thanks, Balaji! Now my

Re: [PATCH] RE: libcilkrts/runtime/config/generic/cilk-abi-vla.c failure

cOn Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > It should include a 3 too. My bad sorry. I have fixed it. Attached, > please find a patch. It is committed as obvious. Thanks. Now the next failure mode, I'm afraid. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58951 libtool: link: /scratch2/tmp/ge

Re: Warning about __DATE__ and __TIME__

On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28 October 2013 21:13, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> I don't have any strong objection, but I'll note that it's even easier >> to use -D options. >> >> CC='gcc -D__DATE__=today' > It's undefined behaviour in both C and C++ to redefine pre-defined > macro

Re: Broken links to libstdc++ docs

Hi Jonathan, On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Once again the links from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ to the > libstdc++ docs don't work: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.4/libstdc++/manual/ > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.3/libstdc++/manual/ this works for me now a

Re: [buildrobot] First results of running contrib/config-list.mk

On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I think it's time to remove targets that have been under --enable-obsolete > for a while - and to obsolete, for possible future removal, targets > without stdint.h type information configured in GCC (see list in >

Re: [doc] Fixing reference inside Extended-Asm.html

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Patrick Marlier wrote: > I have noticed that the link > Extended-asm-with-goto.html#Extended-asm-with-goto is wrong in > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html. > Locally when I generate the html doc, the link is good, ie href="#Extended-asm-with-goto">. I had a

Re: Broken link in gcc-4.8/changes.html

Hi Paolo, On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote: > I just noticed a broken link (in case the issue is trivial I may get > around to fixing it myself, but at the moment I don't know): > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/X86-Built-in-Functions.html#X86-Built-in-Functions > > (it appers twice

Re: Broken link Extended-asm-with-goto.html#Extended-asm-with-goto in online HTML documentation

Hi Stephan, On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > the link of "Extended asm with goto" is > > > > to a non-existing > > > > which gets redirected as > > > > to a URL with non-matchi

Re: Problems with references in documentation

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Trying to document some new options/name spaces, I ran into following > problem with hyperlinking inside the document. > > It's best explained with an example from documentation: > > Start at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Variable-Attribute

Re: Broken links

Hi Odne, On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Odne Hellebø wrote: > Just wanted to report that these links on your page are broken: > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++/manual/ > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++/api/ > > With their pdf, xml and html tarball links. > > I noticed b

Re: broken link (and other issues) on the _contribute.html_ page

On Fri, 10 May 2013, Zvi Gilboa wrote: > On the _/contribute/.html_//page (http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html), the > link to the script that should help check conformance with GNU coding style is > broken (the root "trunk" is unknown, etc.) Thanks for the report, Zvi. I fixed this by means of th

Update MAINTAINERS (Re: Remove spam in GCC mailing list)

On Sun, 22 Dec 2013, Tae Wong wrote: > It will be better if you have enabled the Launchpad account seotaewong40. > > This account has been suspended for renaming an answer title multiple times. The GCC team has nothing to do with Launchpad. > There's also an ordering error on the GCC maintainer

Re: A 404 error in gcc-4.8.2 onlinedocs

Hi Gleb, On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Gleb Smirnov wrote: > I have been browsing the online docs here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.2/gcc/ > Turns out that clicking on "3.6 Options Controlling Objective-C and > Objective-C++ Dialects" results in a 404 error. > > That is, > http://gcc.gnu.org/

Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Hi Andrew, On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Andrew MacLeod wrote: OK, hows this look? I added a link in the news as well. Index: index.html === + Atomic memory model support + [2011-11-06] + C++11/C11 http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/GCCMM"

[wwwdocs] Remove ia64-unknown-linux-gnu as secondary platform

Based by a request by all three release managers the steering committee aggreed to remove ia64-unknown-linux-gnu as a secondary platform for GCC 4.7 and I applied the patch below to update our documentation accordingly. Gerald Index: criteria.html =

Defaulting to -fno-math-errno (was: Fwd: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend)

On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > If one were to create a new libm, why not dispense with the errno > stuff altogether, and make -fno-math-errno the default, at least in > c99/c++11 modes (and set the math_errhandling macro properly). Some > quick googling suggests that libm's which don

Re: gcc-4.3-20120304 is now available

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, gccad...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Snapshot gcc-4.3-20120304 is now available on > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20120304/ What happened here? Some collateral damage while getting the GCC 4.7 branch set up? Gerald

Re: RFC: -Wall by default

On Sun, 8 Apr 2012, Robert Dewar wrote: > Do you really want me to file hundreds of bug reports that are for > cases of uninitialized variables well known to everyone, and well > understood by everyone, and not easy to fix (or would have been > fixed long ago)? Perhaps we should move this class of

Re: Mirror

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Игорь wrote: > I've set up a new mirror for GCC. > Here are the details: > Server name – Webhostinggeeks > Server admin – Igor, whg@gmail.com > Server location – Riga, Latvia > Server address – http://mirrors.webhostinggeeks.com/ > Server protocol – http > Connection speed

Re: RFH - Testing targets for the switch to C++

On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Diego Novillo wrote: > The testing plan is, then, to go through this table to make sure that > we can build all of them with C++ enabled for all stages. > > I have created a wiki page to track testing progress: > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CppBuildStatus > > My plea for help is t

Re: [PATCH] Add StarPU on extensions.html

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > As suggested by Gerald Pfeifer. Thanks, Ludovic. http://gcc.gnu.org/extensions.html now has this reference. Gerald

Re: Mirror

Installed now, after an exchange with Igor and monitoring the mirror for ten days. Thanks, Igor! Gerald On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I was just going to add your server by means of the patch below, > alas all attempts to rach the server time out. What's going on?

Re: Character set for libstdc++ manual

[ Adding our libstdc++ list ] On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Martin von Gagern wrote: > While browsing http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ using Firefox, I > noticed some mojibake due to the fact that the page was interpreted as > iso-8859-15, my default charset, while it is actually meant to be utf-8.

Renaming Stage 1 and Stage 3

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > No opinion on your actual question, but note that there is no more > stage2. We now go directly from stage1 to stage3. This is just another > feature of gcc development seemingly designed to confuse newbies, and > evidently even confuses experienced

Re: [onlinedocs]: No more automatic rebuilt?

On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Andreas Schwab wrote: > libgomp.texi is still using gpl.texi, although libgomp has been > relicensed to GPLv3 in 2009. OK? Looks good, thank you. > (This is the last use of gpl.texi in the gcc sources. Perhaps it > should be removed and gpl_v3.texi renamed back to gpl.texi?

Re: [onlinedocs]: No more automatic rebuilt?

On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Next problem: libiberty. This looks reasonably well in dvi and pdf. > OK? That should really be the last error. > > Andreas. > > * copying-lib.texi (Library Copying): Don't use @heading inside > @enumerate. Looks reasonable. Thanks, And

Re: Malicious content being served

On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Larry Baker wrote: > My attempt to access the www.netgull.com mirror was blocked by our web > content filter today. They tell me that this site may be serving > malicious content: Thanks for the heads up, Larry. From what I can tell, the GCC mirror side of netgull.com seems

Re: Reproducible gcc builds, gfortran, and -grecord-gcc-switches

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Simon Baldwin wrote: > This creates a problem for build and packaging systems that are > fanatical about binary reproducibility and checksums. Temporary file > names differ on each compilation, so that two different builds of > libgfortran.a, and by extension all of gcc, will

Picochip port (was: Steering Committee)

Hi Hari, On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Hariharan Sandanagobalane wrote: > I used to maintain the picochip port of GCC, but I have not been > active on the picochip port over the last 8 months. This is unlikely > to change in the future, so I would like my name to be removed from > the maintainers list as p

Re: Compilation error between SVN trunk revision 190444 and 190442

On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > When my HEAD is at (svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@190444 > 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4) I get the following error (please > see it pasted below). When I revert to 1 commit before that, the problem > seem to go away... Is it someth

Re: Compilation error between SVN trunk revision 190444 and 190442

On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote: > Sorry about the breakage. I committed another patch that fixed the > 4.1 build failure without messing up other builds. I am actually surprised how smoothly the transition has gone overall! Gerald

Re: Let INSTALL/README mention the instructions on line

On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Křištof Želechovski wrote: > Please consider the following patch: Thank you, Křištof! I made some small tweaks, created a ChangeLog entry and applied the variation of your patch that is included below. Gerald 2012-08-25 Křištof Želechovski * INSTALL/README: Also

Re: internal compiler error using lambda and this

On Tue, 29 May 2012, Andreas Karrenbauer wrote: > To whom it may concern: > > Please find a small code example which causes an internal compiler error with > g++-4.7 (opensuse): Thanks for the report, Andreas. I tried this with a current snapshot of what will become GCC 4.8.0 in several months,

Re: typos in http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CppConventions

On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> They clause client code taking the address >> >>  => cause >> >> >> structs adn classes >>  => and > So fix them, it's a wiki. I saw these typos were still there, so I just fixed them. Thanks for the report, Jay. Gerald

[wwwdocs] Update links to C++ ABI (was: at exit alternative for AIX)

On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > The official link at http://codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/ (note trailing > slash) still works. It used to be http://sourcery.mentor.com/public/cxx-abi/ as of lately, and now redirects to http://mentorembedded.github.com/cxx-abi/ . I went ahead and updated

Re: [wwwdocs] Update links to C++ ABI

On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> It used to be http://sourcery.mentor.com/public/cxx-abi/ as of lately, >> and now redirects to http://mentorembedded.github.com/cxx-abi/ . >> >> I went ahead and updated all our references per the patch below. > I don't think that is wise. The docume

Re: HTTP header doesn't specify utf-8

On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> This page: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html (and other >> pages) don't include a utf-8 charset in the content-type http header, > See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-04/msg00597.html and > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-06/msg00125.html

Re: internal compiler error using lambda and this

On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I tried this with a current snapshot of what will become GCC 4.8.0 > in several months, and now get this: > > $ cat x.cc > auto foo = [&](int a) { return a > this->b; }; > > $ g++ x.cc > x.cc:1:6: error: &#

Re: Bugzilla new bug page

On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > That PR now has a link to a mocked up bugzilla page: > http://www.kayari.plus.com/gcc/enter_bug.cgi-1.html which I think > would be a significant improvement, without getting in the way or > being an eyesore. > > Do any other maintainers have an opinio

Re: [wwwdocs] Release note entry for Function Multiversioning

Hi Sri, On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > I have added a release note for Function Multiversioning which is > checked into trunk. Please review. Index: changes.html === + Function Multiversioning Support with G++: Is

Re: Deprecate i386 for GCC 4.8?

On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, John Marino wrote: > FreeBSD ports have every modern version of GCC in them, nothing stops a > user from building and using the latest GCC on FreeBSD (Note the ports > are well maintained). Thanks, John. :-) (Note to those not aware I am taking care of those.) On Thu, 13 D

Re: Chromium ISSUE with GCC 4.8

it older and does not yet feature 2012-11-12 Ian Lance Taylor Rainer Orth Gerald Pfeifer * configure.ac: Check for getexecname. * fileline.c: #include . Define getexecname if not available. (fileline_initialize):

Do we want the like of http://gcc.gnu.org/r22342 ?

In bug 55237, Uros suggested to implement shortcuts from the like of http://gcc.gnu.org/r194572 to http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=194572 I implemented this now, but before making this a new standard, I did want to ask here whether any of you have concerns or suggestions aro

Re: Character set for libstdc++ manual

Hi Martin, On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Martin von Gagern wrote: > On 10.06.2012 15:39, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> I had a quick look at telling docbook stylesheets to add the charset, >> or not output utf8, and couldn't see how to do it. Maybe Benjamin >> knows. > If that should prove difficult, there are

Re: pre-compiled versions of GCC for hp-ux

On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> I belong to HP-UX Itanium/PA-RISC GCC compiler team. I noticed that the >> GCC page (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html) that lists out the >> pre-compiled versions of GCC (for different platforms) does not contain >> the web link of "GCC for

Re: About new project

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Hongtao Yu wrote: > How can I set up a new project under GCC and make it open-sourced? > Thanks! That depends on what you mean by "under GCC", I'd say. If you have improvements for GCC, submitting those as patches against GCC will be best, cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.h

Re: gcc 4.8 status not reflected on website

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Kenny Simpson wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org still shows: > Development: GCC 4.8.0 (changes, release criteria) > Status: 2013-01-08 > > but there just was a status update: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-02/msg00177.html I have a mail filter/script in place that notifies m

Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?

On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote: > There are technical details of the maintaining part - like would the > material reside in SVN? Or in the CVS where we keep our webpages? Or > somewhere else public (github?)? Would we want to have an official > maintainer and use the usual patch /

Re: Version specific onlinedocs page

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote: > I wonder if we could generate a version-specific page for the online > documentation. I think that should be trivial to maintain and I know > at least one vendor who would use it. If "we" means that you are volunteering ;-), absolutely, go for it! Give

Re: Version specific onlinedocs page

On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote: If "we" means that you are volunteering ;-), absolutely, go for it! ;-) How about the following patch? If it is okay, I will add the remaining index.html for 4.6 and 4.7 and update gcc-4.6/index.html – and then commit it. Looks good to me. Perhaps

Re: [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > As such, I'd like to get a general indication from the greater GCC> community > as to this plan. Does this document seem like a good idea? > (Previously, we've left this kind of document to the user community. > Often the passage of time has not been pa

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote: > Organization: > - We'll start a fresh branch in the FSF repository dedicated to concepts >(it's branches/cxx0x-concepts-branch). Initially, Doug and Jason >will be maintainers of this branch Thanks for documenting this in svn.html! Just one quip:

Re: Gcc stack alignment branch is created

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, H.J. Lu wrote: > I created gcc stack alignment branch to implement our proposal > to automatically align stack: > > svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/stack Would you mind also adding an entry to the list of active branches to http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html? Gerald

Re: Gcc stack alignment branch is created

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, H.J. Lu wrote: > Does it look OK? I also updated my email address. Yes, thanks! In the first sentence you could say "...to automatically align the stack...", but that's only a minor detail. Gerald

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote: > I was planning to kill the cxx0x-branch outright, because it has > nothing that isn't available on mainline (except a not-nearly-complete > delegating constructors implementation), and will not be used. If this > would be better handled by moving the entry

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote: > Okay, done. Thanks! I added the minor patch below on top. Gerald Index: svn.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svn.html,v retrieving revision 1.75 diff -u -3 -p -r1.75 svn.html ---

Re: gcc-testresults spam filter?

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, H.J. Lu wrote: > My testsuite are also bounced. Is there a problem? > > H.J. > On Feb 9, 2008 6:12 AM, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Is anyone else having their gcc testresults rejected by >> the mail server as containing elements that appear to be >> spam? Yep

Re: Volunteer for a Beginner's Project: Header-Header Interdependencies

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Ben Elliston wrote: >> You don't really need approval to work on GCC. Just make sure you can >> contribute. You can get guidance by posting your questions here or on >> IRC. > Tom, if you are going to make significant code contributions to GCC, > make sure you have your copy

Re: future MELT (formerly Basilys) branch

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > All the legal stuff has been done. I have write access (after approval) > > > unfortunately my code is still very buggy and not entirely complete. Sounds like perfect material for a branch. :-) > Diego Novillo told me that I could make a branch

Re: [PATCH, DOC] PR 31549: move -frtl-abstract-sequences description

[ gcc-patches -> gcc ] On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > The last time I tried this on ARM it didn't work because there were > ICEs and it might have been fixed by now. > > However searching on bugzilla found me these . > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33009 > htt

Re: bootstrap broken on mingw

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > I see two possibilities: revert above patch, and list texinfo 4.11 as > prerequisite for building the pdf/dvi I'm not in favor of making texinfo 4.11 a requirement. As far as I can see it was released less than half a year ago and even recent release

Re: GCC 4.3 branch created, 4.4 opens for stage1

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Erm, so I committed the patch to trunk and 4.2 now, and marked the PR as > fixed. But I forgot that the 4.3 branch has opened in the meantime. I > read that it needs special approval. > > So does you above OK also extend to the 4.3 branch? Heh, by c

Re: GCC mirror changing IPs

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Joe Laffey wrote: > If you could enable the mirror access for the new IP I would appreciate > it. Note that the old IP may be active for a little while as well. I am > using it to get the latest release right now. I've forwarded this to the group of admins for the gcc.gnu.or

Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Do we still want to keep this branch alive? Looking at the changes that were made in the last three months still, it seems the branch is still surprisingly alive, so it may not yet be the time to close it. Personally I don't have a preference either w

Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Just like with any other parts of GCC, you can check out the web docs > and change them yourself. Yes I agree they should be mentioned. That's fair to some extent, but only to some -- if I find an issue with the kernel, I'd hope this _not_ to be Andi's

Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available

On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > However there is a class of users who don't get their compiler from > distributors, but who also want the safety of using official releases and > not some random svn checkout. These users are missing one year's worth of > bugfixes. They may not want to

MAINTAINERS update (was: [wwwdocs] java/projects.html -- remove broken link)

Anyone knows how to update the following in MAINTAINERS? libgcj Bryce McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason I am asking is that I just got <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550 5.2.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Mailbox disabled for this reci

[wwwdocs] Re: GCC 4.3.1 Status Report (2008-03-15)

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > GCC 4.3.1 is due no later than 2008-05-05, but if a workaround for the > x86 direction flag issue is agreed and committed soon then 4.3.1-rc1 > may come around a week after such a workaround is committed to the > branch, with the release following about

[wwwdocs] Re: GCC 4.4 schedule

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Richard Guenther wrote: > GCC 4.4 stage1 started at Feb 18th and will end two month after that, > Apr 21st. Stage2 will end two month after that, Jun 23th. After > stage3 ends at Aug 18th we will go into regresion and documentation > fixes only and process with releasing after

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs a bit of help

Working on the link consistency of the http://gcc.gnu.org, I ran into a couple of links on the libstdc++ side that are in need of a bit love. It would be great could one of you libstdc++ guys look into those. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/parallel_mode.html * http://gcc.g

[wwwdocs] Re: GCC 4.2.4 Status Report (2008-03-15)

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > GCC 4.2.4 is due around 2008-04-02, so 4.2.4-rc1 should be built by > one of the release managers around 2008-03-26. And here is the set of web page updates I made based on this. develop.html: Add tentative date for GCC 4.2.4, use ISO dates for the GC

Re: [OT]: Categories and proposals for awards at the GCC Summit

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Joe Buck wrote: > No, you get the award for memorizing the Bugzilla database. Yeah, let's do a quiz with questions of the kind "Which releases and architectures does Bugzilla X affect". :-) Seriously, go for it, Tom and Diego! Gerald

Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs a bit of help

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> Working on the link consistency of the http://gcc.gnu.org, I ran into >> a couple of links on the libstdc++ side that are in need of a bit love. >> It would be great could one of you libstdc++ guys look into those. > Should be all fixed with the below, a

Re: gcc_contrib bug

Hi DJ, I agree that an infinite loop isn't exactly helpful. I believe the original code for that aspect of contrib/gcc_update was contributed by Alexandre; perhaps he's got an idea? Gerald On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, DJ Delorie wrote: > we use the following logic: > > ... : > @for f in $? $@; d

Re: Copyright assignment wiki page

On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, FX wrote: > The web page documentation at http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html > doesn't really have the specifics of getting a copyright assignment > done in the simple case of an individual contributing on his free > time. I've set up a wiki page that we can refer people to, at

Re: GCC 4.2.4 Status Report (2008-04-10)

Installed. Gerald Index: index.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.656 diff -u -3 -p -r1.656 index.html --- index.html 7 Apr 2008 12:02:22 - 1.656 +++ index.html 12 Apr 2008 12:58

Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs a bit of help

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > From what I can tell, the links to libstdc++ documentation on the gcc > web site are generated from the gcc/libstdc++-v3/doc/html directory. > This is fine, I guess. But the problem is that when this directory > structure changed, none of the old files w

Re: Request copyright assignment form

Hi Bob, On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Bob Walters wrote: > Can you send me any reference to the current copyright assignment > form, so that I can get this taken care of. I found something online > at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-09/msg00678.html, but have no idea > if that is current, so wanted to chec

Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs a bit of help

On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Yes, and no. I think there are two issues here. The one you are pointing > out, the other the fact that we changed existing URLs (some of them old or > "prominent" ones with external links towards them). > > I believe you

Re: all-target-libstdc++-v3 broken again

Similarly on i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 which had the same build failure mode and also seems fine again. Thanks, Gerald

Re: gcc on IA64 platform

On Tue, 20 May 2008, Andrey Belevantsev wrote: > As you can see from the above page, it comes from the 2001 mini summit, > so most of the projects mentioned there are already done. Any chance you could make a pass through that page and remove those items that you know have already been done, or s

Re: GCC Compile Farm News: two new bi-quad core machines available

On Tue, 20 May 2008, Richard Guenther wrote: > Isn't this worth an entry on the GCC news page? Yes, it certainly is! On Wed, 21 May 2008, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > If there's consensus, I can certainly propose a patch. Please. :-) On Wed, 21 May 2008, Joe Buck wrote: > Please do. We should thank

Re: How to post to GCC lists?

Hi Omar, On Thu, 22 May 2008, Omar Torres wrote: > 2- Currently, (1) is the only thing I have run cross. I am sure there > are other issues that those of you with more experience have already > discovered and solve. Any other Dos/Don'ts or tips/tricks when posting > to GCC ML? http://gcc.gnu.org/

Re: GCC Compile Farm News: two new bi-quad core machines available

On Fri, 23 May 2008, Sebastian Pop wrote: > AMD Developer Central has generously donated two bi-quad core > machines with the latest AMD Opteron 8354 "Barcelona B3" processors > and 16GB of RAM to the GCC Compile Farm > project for use by free software developers. Hosting is donated > by http://ww

Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs a bit of help

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: >> libstdc++-html.20080213 drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 258048 Mar 26 >> 06:05 libstdc++-html.20080326 drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 237568 Jan >> 18 06:49 libstdc++-html-USERS-20080118 > > These are just the latest doxygen files, ie things that > the "late

GCC 4.1 snapshots

At this point, we have three open release branches (4.1, 4.2, and 4.3) and trunk. Currently we are generating weekly snapshots for all four of these. A while ago we agreed, for a number of reasons, not to do any further GCC 4.1.x releases and the speed of changes on that branch has noticably slo

Re: Some bugs in the GCC 4.3 release notes

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, James Brown wrote: > The link the the GCC 4.3 release notes to the TR1 implementation > status page is dead. No more, fixed with the patch below. (This was one of the side effects of a documentation rewrite on the libstdc++ side.) > Also, the parallel mode page is somewhat u

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >