Hi Hari, On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Hariharan Sandanagobalane wrote: > I used to maintain the picochip port of GCC, but I have not been > active on the picochip port over the last 8 months. This is unlikely > to change in the future, so I would like my name to be removed from > the maintainers list as picochip maintainer. I am still actively > working on GCC, so I would like to be added to the "Write after > approval" list.
you can just go ahead and make this change (moving yourself from maintainer of picochip to the write after approval section). A maintainer stepping down is nothing the steering committee can, should nor wants to approve. Giving a heads up and updating MAINTAINERS is very much appreciated, however, as opposed to simply disappearing. What does this mean for the future of the Picochip port in GCC? Daniel, are you going to pick this up actively? Anyone else? Or should we look into deprecating the port with GCC 4.8 and possibly removing it with the following release? Gerald
