On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote: > I was planning to kill the cxx0x-branch outright, because it has > nothing that isn't available on mainline (except a not-nearly-complete > delegating constructors implementation), and will not be used. If this > would be better handled by moving the entry to "Inactive Development > Branches", I'll certainly do that.
Yes, for historical reasons it would be nice to have that branch documented there, with a note that/when it was merged into mainline as for some of the other examples there. Gerald PS: Nice patch of yours that fixes seven PRs at once. :-)
