[wwwdocs PATCH] for Re: autovectorization in gcc

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> [ https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/vectorization.html ] > I'm not disputing that there could be better documentation, but that > page is not the place to find it. That page should probably get a > notice added saying that the project is complete a

Re: GCC Git hooks

On Sat, 14 Sep 2019, Jason Merrill wrote: > Separately, Joseph volunteered to deal with converting the gcc-www > repository to git and dealing with those hooks. This is great, thank you! I was absolutely going to join Cauldron this week, but something personal is consuming me all of this month

Re: GCC Git hooks

On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, Joseph Myers wrote: > Apart from general review of the test conversion / conversion and hook > scripts, which everyone can do, I think the main thing would be to advise > on what needs to happen to avoid breaking the www.gnu.org copy of the site > and your HTML validation sy

Re: GCC Git hooks

On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Joel Brobecker wrote: > You mean the email notification sent by the hooks when a commit > gets pushed? If yes, here is an example: > > https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2019-09/msg00041.html Thank you, Joel! I got a little worried how to best parse that ;-), but then Jos

Re: GCC wwwdocs move to git done

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, Joseph Myers wrote: > I've done the move of GCC wwwdocs to git (using the previously posted and > discussed scripts), including setting up the post-receive hook to do the > same things previously covered by the old CVS hooks, and minimal updates > to the web pages dealing wit

Re: git conversion of GCC wwwdocs repository

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I mean that there's not much value in having my past commits listed as > coming from various "different" authors: > > Jonathan Wakely > Jonathan Wakely > Jonathan Wakely > Jonathan Wakely > Jonathan Wakely > > All of those "identities" are the sa

Re: Hello, I would like to know how to download gcc 9.2 in windows from here. https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-9.2.0/ Thanks.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Aditya Guharoy wrote: > I would like to know how to download gcc 9.2 in windows from here. > https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-9.2.0/ We distribute source code, that in turn can then be built for various platforms (such as Windows). If you enter "gcc windows binary" in your favo

Re: GCC 7.5 Released

On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Richard Biener wrote: > This is also the last release from the GCC 7 branch which > will receive no further fixes from now on. I disabled snapshots from the GCC 7 branch on gcc.gnu.org. (It appears you made that change in SVN and ~gccadmin/scripts on that machine, but not th

Re: GCC 7.5 Released

On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Richard Biener wrote: >> I disabled snapshots from the GCC 7 branch on gcc.gnu.org. > Huh, I thought I did - I usually do this when creating the RC > (and I didn't see a new snapshot during the RC phase). ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20191107/ came after ftp://gcc.gnu

Re: http://www.netgull.com mirror broken

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019, Dan Allen wrote: > http://www.netgull.com has gcc snapshots and releases, but in the past > few weeks only the diffs are there - none of the actual source tarballs > are present. > > I am not sure how to get this message through to netball, but I figured > you had a better c

Re: New GCC mirror from Rabat, Morocco

Hi Sami, On Sun, 6 Oct 2019, Sami Ait Ali Oulahcen wrote: > We'd like to start mirroring the GCC. apologies, it appears none of us did get back to you last year? Happy to have you as a mirror, and if you'd like to submit a patch for https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html that'd be great. Otherwise we

Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT

On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > I was wrong re. r182541, I didn't notice that it is the first commit on > branch. This renders the analysis in favor of reposurgeon conversion, > not svn-git. Kudos for that statement, Maxim. And thanks a bunch for all the work you have been doing,

Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT

On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: >> Is there any chance we could get one more trunk snapshot before the >> conversion starts -- even if that means firing up the snapshot process >> Friday? It'd be quite useful for the ongoing Fedora build testing. > I could run a snapshot manually. I was p

Re: Bootstrap failure on aarch64-linux-gnu with trunk

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Jeff Law wrote: > I'm pretty sure its my DSE changes. I'm seeing similar failures on > ppc64le and am about to revert once a bit more testing is complete. I've been seeing this on i386-unknown-freebsd as well. Gerald

Re: Doc question: is "templatized" a word?

On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > The documentation for -Wno-non-template-friend refers to "non-templatized > friend functions" and "templatized functions". I don't see the term > "templatized" used anywhere in the C++ standard. This paragraph also uses > "nontemplate function", whic

Re: wiki syntax changes?

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Janus Weil wrote: > 2016-12-14 12:33 GMT+01:00 Jakub Jelinek : >> There is gcc.css in the wwwdocs CVS repo. But looking at the wiki pages, >> I see just: > Well, from my side it's not worth to put much effort into this right > now. I have worked around the issues on the mentio

[wwwdocs] PATCH Re: DWARF Version 5 Standard Released

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Michael Eager wrote: > The DWARF Debugging Information Format Standards Committee is pleased > to announce the availability of Version 5 of the DWARF Debugging Format > Standard. This patch, which I just applied, updates the GCC 7 release notes accordingly. (Now it's only

Re: [patch] Add -static-libquadmath option

maintainer back then was just an oversight, and I have now committed the change below. Gerald 2017-02-26 Gerald Pfeifer * MAINTAINERS: Remove Neil Booth as option handling maintainer. Index: MAINTAINERS === --- MAINTAINERS

Re: gcc-7-20170305 is now available

On Sun, 5 Mar 2017, gccad...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > gcc-7-20170305.tar.bz2 Complete GCC > > SHA256=ea44ed9c765acacf3ae03a33ea386e70af98f51e97f4506c5bc7b54ded56d19e > SHA1=b9fcd2b9d68753f32234c7e21fef94ef0c91d419 Please note that I changed from MD5 and SHA1 hashes for snapshots t

Target maintainers: doc/install.texi love and care

I noticed that the target-specific sections in doc/install.texi need a little lover and care. It would be great could you have a look and streamline/update before the GCC 7 release. Thanks! Also, I'm offering help around one particular aspect I noticed: References to dependencies on really, re

Re: terminology: zero character vs. null character

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: >> I am currently translating GCC into German. During that, I noticed that >> in some places the term "zero character" means '\0'. The official term >> though is "null character", as per the C standard. > I don't see anything explicit here: https://gc

Re: November 2016 GNU Toolchain Update

On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Nick Clifton wrote: > That's all for now. Hopefully the next update will be a bit sooner in > arriving. Thanks for that update, Nick. Surely interesting reading. Are you planning another update for March or so? ;-) On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Joseph Myers wrote: > Many of the GCC

PATCH for Re: Release notes for GCC 7?

On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Richard Biener wrote: > We've been creating those lazily over the last decade. We can change > that, an entry for releasing.html is appreciated then so we don't forget. And here we go, in time for the release of GCC 7 / branching of GCC 8. (Except, this time I went ahead an

Re: Target maintainers: doc/install.texi love and care

Hi Palmer, On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > I looked at our stuff (RISC-V) and there's almost nothing in there. > Is there something I should add? I looked at the aarch64 stuff in the > "host/target specific issues start here" section and there's some notes > about binutils-2.24.

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V documentation cleanups

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > A recent mailing list post about install.texi cleanup suggested I > take a look at ours, and there were a few problems: > > * No table of contents entries > * Not alphabetically ordered > * Missing a note about requiring binutils-2.28 This looks fi

Re: [PATCH] gcc 8: Implement -felide-function-bodies

On Sat, 1 Apr 2017, David Malcolm wrote: > gcc/ChangeLog: > * common.opt (felide-function-bodies): New option. > * gimplify.c (gimplify_body): Implement function-body > elision. This is okay for the GCC 4.10 branch once you include some testcases. Thanks, Gerald

PATCH for Re: mirrors

On Sat, 8 Apr 2017, Ionut Vatavu wrote: > I would like to announce a new mirror in Germany Gunzenhausen: > > http://www.bothelp.net/mirrors/gcc - updated daily by rsync Thanks, Ionut. This is now part of our mirrors list per the patch below. Gerald Index: mirrors.html =

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Austriaon gcc mirror is offline

On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, Branko wrote: > On your https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html page, first mirror listed is > Austrian ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/gnu/gcc. > > I've noticed that it is offline for a few days. I tried firing email to > Antonin.Sprinzl at tuwien.ac.at as listed on a page, but it keeps bei

Re: Who broke options.h?

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Committed to trunk, 7.x will need to wait until 7.1 is released, > the rc1 is already in the works and this isn't anything new, I > see the same thing already in GCC 4.0. Thanks, Jakub! Are you planning to apply this to GCC 7 after the release of 7.1?

Re: Web page for binaries

Hi FX, On Tue, 2 May 2017, FX wrote: > I’m suggesting we apply the following patch to provide links to macOS > package managers, where users can download binaries for GCC on macOS. I > have included the two major ones, Homebrew and MacPorts. did you mean to send this to gcc-patches@ ? The chan

Re: Potential Bug in GCC5?

Hi Yubin, On Sun, 11 Jun 2017, Yubin Ruan wrote: > I don't know whether this bug has been reported(I have check GCC > Bugzillia though) or has been resolved: > > This program: > > #include > int main() > { > char a = 'a'; > printf("Size of char : %d\n",sizeof(a)); >

Re: Steering committee, please, consider using lzip instead of xz

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: > You mean SUSE Linux Enterprise Server is using a format that does > not guarantee safe interoperability among implementations[1] to > "power mission-critical workloads"!? I am not aware of a single customer complaint. > For the case of SLES[2] I wou

Re: gcc-6-branch snapshots disabled?

On Fri, 14 Jul 2017, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Seems like the weekly snapshots from gcc-6-branch were disabled before > the 6.4.0 release but not re-enabled afterwards. The snapshots from > trunk and gcc-{7,5}-branch are being generated as usual. You are right, I observed the same and just enabl

Re: Remove ca.mirror.babylon.network

On Sun, 16 Jul 2017, Tim Semeijn wrote: > We will soon decommission our Canadian mirror due to restructuring. > Please remove the following server from the mirror list: > > ca.mirror.babylon.network/gcc Thank for you the head-up, Tim. I applied the patch below to make this change accordingly. >

Re: [og7] Git branch "openacc-gcc-7-branch"

On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > This being a Git-only branch, should it nevertheless be listed on > , in the "Active Development Branches" > section, replacing "gomp-4_0-branch" there? I would say so (with an according note). Thanks for thinking of that

Re: Remove broken GCC 7.1 GCJ manual links

Hi Krisztian, On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Paczári Krisztián wrote: > GCJ has been removed from GCC 7.1, so these broken links should also be > removed from the documentation page (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/) > and probably from the scripts generating them: "GCC 7.1 GCJ Manual (also > in PDF or Po

Re: broken link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for link to "Profile Mode" page:

On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Thanks for letting us know, I've fixed the link. Thanks, Jonathan. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/profile_mode.html ^ Should we do something about "manual

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: New mirror site

On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, Daniel Volchixin wrote: > URL: http://mirror.linux-ia64.org/gnu/gcc/ > Country/City: Russia / Novosibirsk > Contact email / name: dan...@volchixin.co.uk (Daniel Volchixin) Thank you for hosting this mirror, Daniel and letting us know. I added this to our mirrors page with the

Re: Create a new mirror

Hi Martin, On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, KoDDoS Mirror wrote: > We would like to create a new mirror for GCC in Dronten, Netherlands. > > Can you let us know how to process? you can just ahead, and let us know (ideally with a patch against http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html ); that's all then. :-) Cheers,

[PATCH] for Re: netgull.com mirror doesn't have gcc release .sig files.

On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Richard Biener wrote: >> The reason you do not see .sig files on our netgull.com mirror is >> that it mirrors gcc.gnu.org, which does not carry those, whereas >> ftp.gnu.org and hence its mirrors has them. >> >> Richi, Jakub, can you also add those .sig files to the copies on >>

Re: Create a new mirror

Hi Martin, On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, KoDDoS Mirror wrote: > The mirror is setup. Here is a patch as I do not have write access to > push it. I was just going to commit the following patch (sorry for the delay), alas noticed your mirror does not seem to, umm, mirror? The expectation is that you'll mir

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Create a new mirror

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, KoDDoS Mirror wrote: > We added missing cronjob to update it. It should be updated in > less than 6 hours. Yep, it did. I just applied the patch below. Thank you for mirroring and letting us know! Gerald Index: mirrors.html ===

www.sgi.com/tech/stl/ is gone

...redirecting to a dummy page. Unfortunately there are a fair number of references in the libstdc++ docs, see below. I'll take care of anything outside of libstdc++; can you please have a look as far as the libstdc++ docs go? Gerald http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html □ ht

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC mirror - Please read it

On Sat, 3 Feb 2018, BigSearcher Info wrote: > please let me know if you need the mirror I set for the GCC community > some weeks ago. Thank you for doing that and letting us know, and sorry for the delay in responding. I just added this to the official GCC mirrors list per the patch below. Chee

"file name" vs "filename"

And now to the most important question of all. ;-) Should we use "file name" or "filename" when referring to the name of a file? Our docs currently are about even and I think it would be good to settle on one? % grep "filename" $GCC/gcc/doc/*.texi | wc -l 92 % grep "file name" $GCC/gcc/doc

[cpp,doc] PATCH for Re: CPP documentation minor typo

patch below. Gerald 2018-04-02 Gerald Pfeifer * doc/cpp.texi (Variadic Macros): Fix line continuation in an example. Index: doc/cpp.texi === --- doc/cpp.texi(revision 259011) +++ doc/cpp.texi(

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Remove *.mirror.babylon.network

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Tim Semeijn wrote: > For the foreseeable future we will not be able to provide our mirrors > anymore. Could you please remove: > > nl.mirror.babylon.network > fr.mirror.babylon.network Thank you for letting us know, Tim, and your service in the past! Both are really appreciat

[wwwdocs PATCH] for Re: Policy for reverting someone else commit?

On Sun, 20 May 2018, Richard Biener wrote: > IIRC there is a 24h rule that global maintainers can invoke. Not > sure if that is formally documented somewhere. Yes, we have a reversion policy; it is documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html And, after me just having applied the patch belo

Re: bootstrap failure due to declaration mismatch in r260956

On Wed, 30 May 2018, Martin Sebor wrote: > I think your r260956 is missing the following hunk: If this fixes the bootstrap for you (also ran into this myself just now), can you please go ahead and commit? We can always sort out things later, if there are details to be tweaked, but fixing a bootst

Building libssp on a system without gets()

Hi Jakub, some folks in FreeBSD-land have worked to remove all uses of gets() and in fact the gets() function itself. Generally GCC builds just fine in such an environment, except for libssp where libssp/gets-chk.c has the following: char * __gets_chk (char *s, size_t slen) { char

Re: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22)

On Sun, 23 May 2010, Richard Guenther wrote: >> I am wondering, should I stop the weekly snapshot for the GCC 4.3 >> branch and just create them ad hoc when there is demand? > It would be nice if the scripts could check whether only DATESTAMP > changes were done since the last snapshot ... How can

Re: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22)

On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Dongsheng Song wrote: > Just for curiousness, why we bump the DATESTAMP when the last commit > is DATESTAMP changes on the branch ? As far as I am concerned, that's a bug (or a missing feature). The script in question is maintainer-scripts/update_version_svn in the GCC source

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send > any other suggestions, or say if you wish to volunteer to maintain one > of these targets to avoid deprecation Thanks for doing this, Joseph! I am not sure how to formally handl

Re: Making gcc -no-canonical-prefixes the default?

On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Some archealogy turned up this as the reason canonicalization was > inserted: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-02/msg01121.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01697.html > > Also relevant here is http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29931 . I am q

HEADS UP: [wwwdocs] Fix description of maintainer/reviewer privileges

I realized that our documentation has not been adjusted to (not so) recent changes and clarifications around the concepts of maintainers and reviewers we use. In fact, we don't have global maintainers any more and introduced the concept of reviewers. On the way I also tried to clarify that docume

Re: Heads up: please help documenting *internal* GCC changes for 4.6

On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > I am not sure to understand the technical ways to modify that; is CVS > still mandatory? Yes, the web pages reside in CVS. Not a lot different from SVN in terms of operations, just `cvs update`, `cvs diff`, `cvs commit` instead of the same svn co

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

;; > > case up to You mean like this? Not sure who would approve something like this, technically. Shall I got ahead and commit this? Gerald 2011-02-01 Gerald Pfeifer * config.gcc (*-*-freebsd[12], *-*-freebsd[12].*, *-*-freebsd*aout*): Move to the unsup

Bumping DATESTAMP (was: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22))

On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Dongsheng Song wrote: >> The DATESTAMP change could also be in a post-commit hook (doing >> nothing if the date didn't change, of course).  No idea whether >> this is technically possible of course. > Yes, the post-commit hook can do this task. > If we really want to do that, I

Re: Bumping DATESTAMP (was: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22))

On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Dongsheng Song wrote: > Index: hooks/update_datestamp > === > --- hooks/update_datestamp (revision 0) > +++ hooks/update_datestamp (revision 0) > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > + > +REPOS="$1" > +REV="$2"

Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Jonathan Wakely wrote: And wouldn't it be appropriate to remove doc/xml/gnu/fdl-1.2.xml now that you have added fdl-1.3.xml? >>> Possibly. We still have gpl-2.0.xml there, which doesn't seem to be >>> included.  I followed that example. >> >> If you are not using GPL

Joseph Myers appointed option handling maintainer

In what may be the most surprising announcement this year (not), I am happy to announce that the steering committee is appointing Joseph option handling maintainer. Thanks for all the time and energy you have put into this already, Joseph! Please adjust the MAINTAINERS file accordingly, and Happy

How to default to -fno-math-errno on all FreeBSD targets

David Schultz noticed that the FreeBSD libm does not set errno, never has done, and never will, and thus has made -fno-math-errno the default in the (old, GCC 4.2-based) system compiler: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=181538 We should also make this change for GCC 4.

Announcing two testsuite maintainers

I am happy to announce that the steering committee has appointed Rainer Orth and Mike Stump testsuite maintainers. This has been an area lacking maintainership for a while and the two of them volunteering is very much appreciated. As usual, please adjust the MAINTAINERS file accordingly, and Happ

Re: A problem of our Gcc mirror

On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Mingjie Xing wrote: > The mirror site in China is unavailable for a long time. I believe it > is helpful if we can have one, though I don't know the requirements of > being a mirror. Indeed; for the time being I am removing this mirror per the patch below. David, if you can

Re: A problem of our Gcc mirror

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, harryxiyou wrote: > What about others? If i can? I want to restore our China's. > Could you give some advice? Once there is a functional mirror, or several, that's been up andworking for a week (better more) just provide a patch to http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html and

Re: Subscribe ?

Please refer to http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html on how to subscribe to our mailing lists, which lists exist and for what purpose (your request would have been more appropriate on gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org), and the policies around the lists. Gerald

Re: old software versions on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/

On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ contains old versions of > some libraries (like GMP, MPFR and MPC). Shouldn't they be updated? > GNU MPFR can also be downloaded from: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/mpfr/ I believe that these days they should be remov

Re: new mirror in Nicosia, Cyprus

On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Grigory Rayskin wrote: > We have set up a new GCC mirror server offering HTTP access: > http://fileboar.com/gcc/ > > This server is located in Nicosia, Cyprus. The update is scheduled twice > a week. I was just going to add this sever, but something does not seem right: All

Re: darwin LTO broken under Xcode 3.2.6/4.0

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Jack Howarth wrote: >Would someone please correct http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html by > deleting > the reference to darwin LTO support. Specifically we should just kill the > line... Done thusly. Gerald Index: changes.html ===

Re: fsf paperwork?

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > I would appreciate it if the steering committee, as the official FSF > maintainers, could pass this on to the FSF. I've raised this with RMS. Gerald

Re: More links in release change list

On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges is a good example of the kind of thing >> I'm talking about. > I doubt many people would disagree, but someone needs to do the work > (in other words "patches welcome"!) > > The GCC wiki could be a good place for

Bootstrap comparison failures

I'm a bit surprised I'm not seeing other notes on this on the list, but all of my automated tests (on i386-unknown-freebsd9.0 and amd64-unknown-freebsd8.2) exhibit comparision failures since yesterday: Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1plus-chec

Re: Confirming a bug in new bugzilla?

On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > All the status have well-defined meanings: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html > > Unfortunately, there is some duplication: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/page.cgi?id=fields.html Quite some duplication, in fact. By virtue of the patch

Re: I wish to host a new mirror site.

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Kohei Takahashi wrote: > I wish to host a new mirror site. > When it is possible to register in the mirror list, it is glad. > > The URL is http://ftp.tsukuba.wide.ad.jp/software/gcc . > The mirror is located in Japan/Tsukuba, mirror manager is me, Kohei > Takahashi, and email

Re: [viewvc]: Bad legibility

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > In viewvc's colored diff views, there is no CSS class defined for > changed lines > > One example: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/config/avr/libgcc.S?r1=172384&r2=172383&pathrev=172384&diff_format=h > > The "removed" lines have a red back

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: going from SunOS 5/SparcWorks -> Linux/gcc

Hi Paweł, On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Paweł Sikora wrote: >> The standard 1st questions are: >> 1) Did you compile with -Wall -Wextra and solve all warnings? >> 2) Did you try with -fno-strict-aliasing? > for legacy code, the '-fwrapv' could be helpful. your mail reminded me that we could/should clarify

Re: Syncing with Launchpad Bug Tracker

On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Does any gcc maintainer object to setting this up? It sounds like a > good idea to me. Indeed. Having our bug tracking systems disconnected is one of the weak spots free software (or Open Source) development is facing and any such attempt to link sy

Re: A legal question

On Wed, 4 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote: > Our web pages say > > "Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any > medium, provided this notice is preserved." > > but does "Verbatim" allow people to translate and redistribute the pages? In spirit it should, legally

Re: GAS GCC FAQ query

On Fri, 6 May 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> I would propose to clarify as: >> >> "To ensure that GCC finds the GNU assembler (or the GNU linker)," > I see no harm in that change, Gerald, what do you think? Agreed. Things would have been different twenty years ago, but these days using linker is

[PATCH] for Re: C99 and C++0x status pages

On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Andre Majorel wrote: > Yesterday, I spent an hour looking for the C99 and C++0x status > pages in http://gcc.gnu.org/, > > http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html > > Apparently, the shortest path to the latter is > > "Releases" >

Re: gcc-4.3-20110515 is now available

On Sun, 15 May 2011, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > If we're building 4.7 snapshots, do we still need 4.3? I suggested to stop doing them last year already. I guess if nobody objects I'll do so in a bit (and will be happy to run them manually upon request thereafter). Gerald

Re: C6X port 13/11: MAINTAINERS

On Fri, 13 May 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Patch appended. Just raised on the steering committee. Gerald

Richard Sandiford appointed RTL maintainer

It's my pleasure to announce that, also based on the recommendation of Eric Botcazou as the current maintainer in that area¹, the steering committee is appointing Richard Sandiford as an additional RTL optimizers maintainer. Please adjust the MAINTAINERS file accordingly, and Happy Hacking, Ri

Re: Richard Sandiford appointed RTL maintainer

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > If RTL optimizers (in the email subject *RTL* maintainer) do not include > areas mentioned by me above, I have no objects. > > In Richard case, I even could live with the bigger interpretation of > term 'RTL optimizers'. Apologies for the imprecise c

Re: GSOC - Student Roundup

Pierre, On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Pierre Vittet wrote: > I feel sad, not being able to use IRC from my web access (in my > school)... and so only communicating by mail with the GCC community. are you aware of http://www.mibbit.com/ and similar clients, that just use plain http, or are you saying that

Three new additional global reviewers

I am happy to announce that the steering committee is appointing our three release managers Jakub Jelinek, Joseph S. Myers, and Richard Guenther to the additional roles of global reviewers. Congratulations! Gerald PS: I assume you guys know the protocol (gcc/MAINTAINERS and such ;-).

Re: Richard Sandiford appointed RTL maintainer

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Diego Novillo wrote: >> * ambiguity of the decision. What does RTL optimizers/RTL maintainer mean? > Anything related to RTL, in my view. As much as possible, I would lean > towards flexible definitions of maintenance boundaries. If we make them > too inflexible, this will

Re: Richard Sandiford appointed RTL maintainer

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Richard Guenther wrote: > I think we started suggesting more maintainers / reviewers to the > SC and the appointments will slowly tickle in. As just has happened now. :-) > So, I suggest you suggest Vlad as IRA maintainer to the SC, and I would > support that suggestion. Ge

Re: 404 Error on Page

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Ahmed Jaffer wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html > > your Vietnam mirror > > # Viet Nam, HoChiMinh: http://mirror-fpt-telecom.fpt.net/gcc/, thanks to Minh > Vu Tong (mirror at fpt dot net) > > is messed up. I repeatedly get a 404 error. Thanks for the report! Minh

[PATCH] for Re: 404 Error on Page

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> # Viet Nam, HoChiMinh: http://mirror-fpt-telecom.fpt.net/gcc/, thanks to >> Minh Vu Tong (mirror at fpt dot net) >> >> is messed up. I repeatedly get a 404 error. > Minh Vu Tong, or other admins at fpt.net, is this a tempo

Re: Hosting new mirror.

Hi Sergey, On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Sergey Kutserey wrote: > Hi there! I would like to host a new mirror in US, Missouri, Saint > Louis. I have a server with alot free space and many bandwidth > available. The mirror will have URL like gcc.petsads.us My email > s.kutse...@gmail.com My name is Serge

PATCH for Re: GCC 4.6.2 Status Report (2011-08-17)

And here is the web page patch... Index: index.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.809 diff -u -r1.809 index.html --- index.html 2 Aug 2011 17:02:57 - 1.809 +++ index.html 18 Aug 2

[PATCH] for Re: New mirror

On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Sergey Kutserey wrote: > Hopefully you can add this mirror into public mirror list for GCC project. Thanks, Sergey. This is how I added your mirror to our list. Gerald Index: mirrors.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/

Lack of libstdc++ compatibility (was: Revision 176335)

On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> Revisions 176335 removed the traditional "#include " from >> gthr-posix.h. This breaks the build of many programs (Firefox, Chromium, >> etc.) that implicitly rely on it. > This isn't the first time the libstdc++ headers were cleaned up, and > each time

Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Joern Rennecke wrote: But readers will focus on the word "Issue" here and think that there is something missing. Perhaps there should be a footnote explaining that glibc/eglibc has the needed support, but that other libraries might not. >>> I agree. It should sa

Re: GCC online documentation

On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> "GCC 4.6.1 Standard C++ Library Manual" and "GCC 4.6.1 Standard C++ Library >> Reference Manual" missing. >> >> [from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.1/ ] > I'm not sure if someone needs to generate those libstdc++ docs > manually. Gerald or Benj

Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h

On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Joern Rennecke wrote: > Attached. Thanks, Jörn! ! "Library Issue" means that support may or may not be available depending ! on the C library used; for example, the GNU C library supports all C99 I suggest a full stop isntead of ";" before "for example" and to just say "defi

Re: Vēlētos paspaidīt Mis Ogrei..

On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Sorry if I'm saying something totally obvious - I'm quite naive in this > area - but do spam filters based on the language of the text already > exist? Yes, SpamAssassin has a filter which tries to implement that: For my primary mailbox, I have ok_lan

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-10-11)

Website updated as follows. Gerald Index: index.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.813 diff -u -r1.813 index.html --- index.html 12 Sep 2011 00:04:45 - 1.813 +++ index.html 12 Oct

Re: [RFC] New git-only branch for Fission project

On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Diego Novillo wrote: > I don't know whether git-only branches get added to > http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html. Gerald? So far we haven't done that, but why not? Either add a new section for GIT branches or create git.html (which may be overkill for now, but more future proof).

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >