On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > I am not sure to understand the technical ways to modify that; is CVS > still mandatory?
Yes, the web pages reside in CVS. Not a lot different from SVN in terms of operations, just `cvs update`, `cvs diff`, `cvs commit` instead of the same svn commands. ;-) On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > I would say that any gcc maintainer may update the changes file without > explicit review. The patch must be valid HTML, and Gerald runs a script > which verifies that. Patches must be sent to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org. > > Only make changes that are correct. If you feel uncertain, you should > get a review. That review can come from any other gcc maintainer. > > (Anyone: please let me know if you disagree with the above.) I think you hit the nail on the head. I do offer the service of reviewing all web pages, either up front or after the fact, but especially for the release notes nobody should be hesitant. ;-) Realizing that our documentation could, and should, be more clear around this I just applied the following documentation update: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02244.html Gerald
