On top of that ,
How do i enable the Byte Invariant Addressing mode for gold ??
Thank you
~Umesh
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Umesh Kalappa
wrote:
> Hi All ,
>
> We are migrating to the gold linker and see the below issue
>
>
> bash-4.1$ /auto/compiler-migration/bin/armeb-linux-gnueabi-ld.
Just letting you know I'm still alive!
I'm currently waiting on approval from my employer before I move ahead
with anything; for now, it's just personal research to help ease into
it. Approval may take a month or two, as I work for a large
corporation.
> I don't know the status of the static anal
On 05/17/2016 02:10 PM, Christopher Di Bella wrote:
>
>> I don't know the status of the static analysis tool the Microsoft were
>> planning to release, which would do a lot of the checking.
>
> As far as I'm aware, this is a Visual Studio tool, and thus closed
> source. I might be wrong!
Some o
On 17 May 2016 at 12:10, Christopher Di Bella wrote:
> Just letting you know I'm still alive!
>
> I'm currently waiting on approval from my employer before I move ahead
> with anything; for now, it's just personal research to help ease into
> it. Approval may take a month or two, as I work for a l
ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-05/msg00120.html
Thanks,
Prathamesh
On 11 May 2016 at 15:39, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 February 2016 at 21:49, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 17 May 2016 at 12:10, Christopher Di Bella wrote:
>> I don't know the status of the static analysis tool the Microsoft were
>> planning to release, which would do a lot of the checking.
>
> As far as I'm aware, this is a Visual Studio tool, and thus closed
> source. I might be wrong!
Currently
On Wed, 11 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > You can't simply use
> >
> > + offset = int_byte_position (field);
> >
> > as it can be placed at variable offset which will make int_byte_position
> > ICE. Note it also returns a truncat
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> Please also note that, in terms of legal papers, the FSF is much more
> flexible than one may think, but they are not very pro-active or fast
> (in my past experience, things may have changed now). If you find some
> internal resistance
Hi,
Here's a report of a successful build and install of GCC:
$ gcc-6.1.0/config.guess
sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
$ newcompiler/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=newcompiler/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/aaro/gcctest/newcompiler/libexec/gcc/sparc-unknown-linux-gnu/6.1.0/lto-wrapper
Snapshot gcc-5-20160517 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20160517/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
10 matches
Mail list logo
