Hi!
One suggestion up-front: I think the GCC mailing lists (or generally all
hosted on sourceware.org/gcc.gnu.org) are configured to drop HTML email,
so you may want to adjust your MUA.
On Fri, 17 May 2013 00:19:17 +0300, Fotis Koutoulakis
wrote:
> > Replacing the (legacy) threadvars
> > mecha
Hi,
I'm testing GIMPLE instrumentation pass and having a trouble with SSA
name coalescing. I get such error only in tests with abnormal edges.
Here is a simple test I use:
void foo ();
void goo (char *);
int test ()
{
char *name = 0;
foo();
_setjmp (0);
if (!name) {
name = "-";
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing GIMPLE instrumentation pass and having a trouble with SSA
> name coalescing. I get such error only in tests with abnormal edges.
> Here is a simple test I use:
>
> void foo ();
> void goo (char *);
>
> int test ()
> {
>
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 04:03:25PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Here is GIMPLE after my instrumentation. Instrumentation
> statements/expressions are marked with +++
>
> test ()
> {
> +++ __tmp.0;+++
> char * name;
> int D.1761;
> int _5;
>
> :
> +++__tmp.0_9 = __length_1;+++
> +++__tmp.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Fotis Koutoulakis
wrote:
>
> Last but not least, I would like to know if you have some other proposition
> for me. Mr Ian could have a suggestion for the go part perhaps?
Make sure you can build and modify gccgo for some other target, e.g., GNU/Linux.
I don't eve
Hello,
I am trying to model a predicate register mode that acts like a vector. We have
a few predicate registers that have 8 bits in size but they are set accordingly
to the mode of operation (not necessarily a comparison). Word size is 64.
Here's an example, for a scalar comparison leq p0, r0,
2013/5/17 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 04:03:25PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> Here is GIMPLE after my instrumentation. Instrumentation
>> statements/expressions are marked with +++
>>
>> test ()
>> {
>> +++ __tmp.0;+++
>> char * name;
>> int D.1761;
>> int _5;
>>
>> :
>> +++
Quoting Paulo Matos :
Hello,
I am trying to model a predicate register mode that acts like a
vector. We have a few predicate registers that have 8 bits in size
but they are set accordingly to the mode of operation (not
necessarily a comparison). Word size is 64.
Yes need some surgery
amylaar,
Do you recall how I can get those ARC branches, where they branches in official
GCC SVN?
Paulo Matos
> -Original Message-
> From: amyl...@spamcop.net [mailto:amyl...@spamcop.net]
> Sent: 17 May 2013 15:12
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Pushing the limit
Found, what it seems to be the most recent arc branch, arc-4_4-20090909-branch/.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewvc/gcc/branches/arc-4_4-20090909-branch/
Paulo Matos
> -Original Message-
> From: amyl...@spamcop.net [mailto:amyl...@spamcop.net]
> Sent: 17 May 2013 15:12
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: gcc
GCC 4.8.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
The first release candidate for GCC 4.8.1 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8.1-RC-20130517
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 199021.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release
Status
==
The GCC 4.8.1-rc1 release candidate has been released.
The branch is frozen now, all changes require release manager approval
until the final release of GCC 4.8.1 which should happen roughly
one week after the release candidate.
Quality Data
Priority # Chan
Hi all,
(Please CC me in replies, not a list member)
I'd like to use libbacktrace in a C++ app built by gcc-4.8.0 [1], but it
seems that the target library doesn't actually get installed, even
though it's built.
Is there a reason user C/C++ apps shouldn't be able to incorporate
libbacktrace
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ryan Johnson
wrote:
>
> Is there a reason user C/C++ apps shouldn't be able to incorporate
> libbacktrace, or is it just an oversight/TODO? It works beautifully if I
> copy the relevant files to where they belong in the install tree [2]; it
> also seems to work jus
On 17/05/2013 6:18 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ryan Johnson
wrote:
Is there a reason user C/C++ apps shouldn't be able to incorporate
libbacktrace, or is it just an oversight/TODO? It works beautifully if I
copy the relevant files to where they belong in the ins
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Ryan Johnson
wrote:
> On 17/05/2013 6:18 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ryan Johnson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a reason user C/C++ apps shouldn't be able to incorporate
>>> libbacktrace, or is it just an oversight/TODO? It work
16 matches
Mail list logo
