Hi,
Sorry for the delayed reply.
> Do you think it is only my misunderstanding (as everyone noticed, my
> English language is poor since it is not my native language), or a bug
> of the gengtype documentation, or a bug in gengtype code? Can several
> GTY tags appear for the same union component a
On 8 July 2010 07:12, Nils Schlemminger wrote:
> Am 08.07.2010 00:56, schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
>>
>> The usage is correct in "standardese" and English.
>> My dictionary gives one definition of "integral" as "denoting a number
>> that is an integer".
>>
>
> Thats correct but not all non native spea
IainS writes:
> I'd like to compile a complete list of targets affected by changes in
> emulated TLS.
[...]
> could people please add to the list/confirm as appropriate?
I can add
* *-*-solaris2.[89]
I've got a patch almost ready that enables native TLS if a couple of
prerequisites are met
Am 08.07.2010 10:49, schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
On 8 July 2010 07:12, Nils Schlemminger wrote:
Am 08.07.2010 00:56, schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
The usage is correct in "standardese" and English.
My dictionary gives one definition of "integral" as "denoting a number
that is an integer".
Thats co
Nils Schlemminger wrote:
Am 08.07.2010 10:49, schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
On 8 July 2010 07:12, Nils Schlemminger wrote:
Am 08.07.2010 00:56, schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
The usage is correct in "standardese" and English.
My dictionary gives one definition of "integral" as "denoting a number
that
> > > But in the C++ standard "integral expression" is more common.
"integral" is an adjective and "integer" is a noun.
"integer expression", though gramatically wrong (or, at best, an
elision of two nouns), is perfectly clear and unambiguous, whereas
"integral expression", though gramatically co
... I only want to add - I said this to the OP in private email too -
that we also have in widespread use expressions like 'integral constant'
and even 'is_integral' (standardized in the C++0x library). Thus I don't
see the point of changing now, after so many years, that specific
integral in the d
Paolo Carlini wrote:
... I only want to add - I said this to the OP in private email too -
that we also have in widespread use expressions like 'integral constant'
and even 'is_integral' (standardized in the C++0x library). Thus I don't
see the point of changing now, after so many years, that spe
Quoting Robert Dewar :
But as noted the C++ standard prefers integral type, so might as well
standardize on that when talking about C or C++.
I think it also helps clarity to speak of integral types. I.e. in the C
family of languages, 'char' is an integral type, but you may not use the
'int'
I can image a few ways to go from here:
- leave as is, fix this when it really bothers us (risk:
exchange a known
problem for unknown hard-to-debug and/or hard-to-reproduce
problems)
- instrument if_marked functions like the one for
value_expr_for_decl to
assert if the from field is live
Joern Rennecke wrote:
Quoting Robert Dewar :
But as noted the C++ standard prefers integral type, so might as well
standardize on that when talking about C or C++.
I think it also helps clarity to speak of integral types. I.e. in the C
family of languages, 'char' is an integral type, but you
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:39 PM, IainS wrote:
> I'd like to compile a complete list of targets affected by changes in
> emulated TLS.
>
> *-*-darwin*
> hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
> cris-*-elf
>
> I think also;
>
> *-*-mingw
> *-*-cygwin
>
> could people please add to the list/confirm as appropriate?
powe
On 07/06/2010 10:39 PM, IainS wrote:
> I'd like to compile a complete list of targets affected by changes in
> emulated TLS.
>
> *-*-darwin*
> hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
> cris-*-elf
>
> I think also;
>
> *-*-mingw
> *-*-cygwin
>
> could people please add to the list/confirm as appropriate?
I'm prett
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 10:39 PM, IainS wrote:
>> I'd like to compile a complete list of targets affected by changes in
>> emulated TLS.
>>
>> *-*-darwin*
>> hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
>> cris-*-elf
>>
>> I think also;
>>
>> *-*-mingw
>> *-*-cygwin
>>
>> could
On 8 July 2010 13:45, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Joern Rennecke wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Robert Dewar :
>>
>>> But as noted the C++ standard prefers integral type, so might as well
>>> standardize on that when talking about C or C++.
>>
>> I think it also helps clarity to speak of integral types. I.e. in t
Hi,
I am writing a paper about instruction-set architecture simulators. In
first time, I used gcc-4.4.0 and the compilation time reached 33
minutes (with -O3) for my simulator and the performance reached 270
MIPS (Million instruction per second). When I used the gcc-4.4.4, in
the same code, the co
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20100708 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20100708/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
I have post this message to both GCC and GDB, because I'm not sure it
is a bug in GDB or GCC.
Hi, I have just find two dwarf debug entries for one local variables.
For example, the sample code is just like:
-
wxString ParserThread::ReadAncestorList()
{
Hi,
I have following questions and would appreciate any comment. Thanks you
very much.
1. How to build a debugable version of GCC? I tried to set CFLGAS &
CXXFLAGS to "-O0 -g -fno-inline" in my configure command line, but it seems it
doesn't work. I manually modify all the Makefiles
I reported something similar back in January:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-01/msg00054.html
As I recall, GCC creates duplicates.
Nenad
On 7/8/10 7:33 PM, asmwarrior wrote:
I have post this message to both GCC and GDB, because I'm not sure it
is a bug in GDB or GCC.
Hi, I have just find t
On 2010-7-9 13:58, Nenad Vukicevic wrote:
I reported something similar back in January:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-01/msg00054.html
As I recall, GCC creates duplicates.
Nenad
Thanks for the reply. I also found your message,
This bug has been fixed,see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
21 matches
Mail list logo
