-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Built with disable-shared:
- - i686-pc-mingw32 gcc-4.4.0 gmp-4.2.4 mpfr-2.4.1 ok
- - i686-pc-cygwin gcc-4.4.0 gmp-4.2.4 mpfr-2.4.1 ok
Rainer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enig
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
I believe that Kiril mentioned in a separate post the equation
(mcs | csc | cscc) & gcc & libJIT == LLVM ?
I tend to believe that Kiril dreams of building a CLI/.NET
infrastructure and VM which uses all the powerful optimisations of GCC.
For reference to Kiril:
To add to this data: on i686-mingw the system gcc-3.4.5-20060117-3
is able to bootstrap SVN 4.4 with --enable-languages=c,ada
the resulting compiler is able to compile simple Ada
programs and ACATS is currently running (I can't
test C because I don't have dejagnu - advice welcomed).
Current trunk
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Combine simplifies lshiftrt/shift/and combined instruction under the
> assumption, that for ZERO_EXTEND LOAD_EXTEND_OP targets it can prove
> that certain bits are zero, so AND operation can be omitted. The
> resulting instruction is valid only for memory op
David Edelsohn wrote:
>> My explanations seem to have also failed to explain you.
>> Unfortunately, one really needs have some back group with both
>> Just-In-Time compilers,Virtual Machines, and Common Intermediate
>> Language to understand this area. I understand that it is not your
>> area of e
Unsurprisingly, this merge was quite painful. Particularly
adapting to all the new EH changes. The main changes I needed to
do:
- The master_clone field is gone from cgraph_node. Some things
had to be handled differently when reading/writing cgraph
nodes.
- There was a bug when emitting/re
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> So... can I/we move forward on this? Or will such a change be
>> rejected?
> It's hard for me to get excited about something like this. It's
> straightforward a programmer to write code that is clearly correct in
> this sort of situation: just don't use a bitfield.
Hi,
I´m having some troubles again. I wanna convert a tree structure to
c_declspecs structure.
Anybody know how I could do that?
Thanks
--
--
"Never memorize something that you can look up." - Albert Einstein
--
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> gcc's -fasynchronous-unwind-tables option is
> intended to support unwinding the stack at any precise instruction
> boundary, which might be adequate for this purpose if the OS can handle
> the adjustment from an exception in the middle of an instructio
> Unsurprisingly, this merge was quite painful. Particularly
> adapting to all the new EH changes. The main changes I needed to
> do:
>
> - The master_clone field is gone from cgraph_node. Some things
> had to be handled differently when reading/writing cgraph
> nodes.
>
> - There was a bu
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Combine simplifies lshiftrt/shift/and combined instruction under the
assumption, that for ZERO_EXTEND LOAD_EXTEND_OP targets it can prove
that certain bits are zero, so AND operation can be omitted. The
resulting instruction is
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:44, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Sorry, I was actually thinking about checking if LTO saves AKA bitmaps
> and tell you, but forgot about that. What do you mean by shared
> regions?
If EH region 3 has the AKA bitmap { 4, 5, 7, 13 } then slots 3, 4, 5 7
and 13 in the EH table wi
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > And again, I'd be perfectly fine with removing this weird
> > LOAD_EXTEND_OP-specific "feature". I'm of half a mind to remove
> > the #define from the MMIX port.
> Please note, that my findings were on 4.3.4 to-be-released bran
Guilherme Puglia <1c3br...@gmail.com> writes:
> To solve my problem I wanna debug the C front end. I was trying to
> debug the gcc main function, toplev_main. Unfortunately, I can't
> insert a break point in this line.
>
> I saw the site http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebuggingGCC and
> http://gcc.gnu.or
Guilherme Puglia <1c3br...@gmail.com> writes:
> I´m having some troubles again. I wanna convert a tree structure to
> c_declspecs structure.
>
> Anybody know how I could do that?
That seems like an odd transformation to want to make. There is nothing
in the compiler which does that today. You c
Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> gcc's -fasynchronous-unwind-tables option is
>> intended to support unwinding the stack at any precise instruction
>> boundary, which might be adequate for this purpose if the OS can handle
>> the adjustment from an excep
Adam Nemet writes:
> Richard Sandiford writes:
>> Adam Nemet writes:
>> > * Synthesizing multi-insns constants from const anchors make sense
>> > regardless
>> > whether the constant is used as an address so I am adjusting the cost
>> > system
>> > to make those stick independent of the context
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> The page on "Host/Target specific installation notes for GCC"
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html) has a broken link.
> In the table of contents it links to
> "http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#x-x-mingw";, while
> "http://gcc.gnu.org/
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> There is currently no way to get from the front page to the
> gcc-4.4/changes.html page, should there be a "(changes)" link on the
> front page until a release is added to the gcc-4.4/index.html page?
I think that would be appropriate, yes. Are you g
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0042c/IHI0042C_aapcs.pdf
>
> and, in particular, \S 7.1.7.5, entitled "Volatile bit-fields".
>
> A first question is if these are the semantics that you're looking for
> in your project. If so, then we could collaborate with you on
> impleme
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Andreas Tobler wrote:
>>> I've cc'ed others who have access to the platforms in question based on
>>> GCC test results. Please help if you can.
>>
>> - powerpc-apple-darwin9.6.0 gcc-4.5.0 gmp-4.2.2 mpfr-2.3.1 ok.
>> - sparc-sun-solaris2.10 gcc-4.4 gmp-4.2.2 mpfr-2.3.1 ok
>> -
2009/4/6 Gerald Pfeifer:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> There is currently no way to get from the front page to the
>> gcc-4.4/changes.html page, should there be a "(changes)" link on the
>> front page until a release is added to the gcc-4.4/index.html page?
>
> I think that would
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Joe Buck wrote:
> When there is traffic, the SC gets to spend time arguing with RMS. Oh, joy.
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Recently I've been thinking: let's have a periodic election for a
> developer ombudsman member on the SC, someone who could summarize
> (to t
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Yes, that's pretty much what they asked for. However, it is still
> somewhat ambiguous - for example, if you have an 8-bit "int" field,
> which 4 bytes are read to get that field?
I haven't gone back just now to try to find the right words in the ABI,
so I don't know for sur
produced:
-rw-r--r-- 1 hirlam hirlam 21492000 2009-04-05 08:31 fc20090405_00+048ve
After the merge of the alias-improvements branch into mainline:
00 UTC run 20090406, last file produced:
-rw-r--r-- 1 hirlam hirlam 21648000 2009-04-06 08:29 fc20090406_00+048ve
So the improvement is 2 minutes
Hi Laurent,
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:24 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On the above list, what are the target triples that are available? Do
>> they match what we have in our list of primary and secondary targets
>> (see http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 23:10 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:24 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> On the above list, what are the target triples that are available? Do
> >> they match what we have in our list
does the function lookup_name distinguish the identifier between
different contexts?
for example
void func1()
{
int foo;
}
void func2()
{
int foo;
}
if I call lookup_name with the foo ident-tree while parsing these
functions, will it return different decl-tree nodes?
thanks
Guilherme Puglia wrote:
> Hi!
>
> or better, hello again! I have posted a question (with my class friend
> Eduardo) about 2 or 3 weeks ago. My question was about the grammar
> wich gcc C front end use.
Yeh! Hi again you guys :)
> To solve my problem I wanna debug the C front end. I was trying
From: "Gerald Pfeifer"
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Andreas Tobler wrote:
I've cc'ed others who have access to the platforms in question based on
GCC test results. Please help if you can.
- powerpc-apple-darwin9.6.0 gcc-4.5.0 gmp-4.2.2 mpfr-2.3.1 ok.
- sparc-sun-solaris2.10 gcc-4.4 gmp-4.2.2 mpfr-2.
Eduardo Cruz writes:
> does the function lookup_name distinguish the identifier between
> different contexts?
I assume you mean the function in the C frontend, in c-decl.c. That
function looks up the name in the current scope, so, yes, it will return
different DECL nodes when appropriate.
Ian
31 matches
Mail list logo
