David Edelsohn wrote: >> My explanations seem to have also failed to explain you. >> Unfortunately, one really needs have some back group with both >> Just-In-Time compilers,Virtual Machines, and Common Intermediate >> Language to understand this area. I understand that it is not your >> area of expertise, so it is not an issue for me. > > I think a JIT associated with GCC would be great. Not everything is > static compilation. "Split Compilation" combining static compilation > for complicated analysis along with a "Managed Runtime" for > execution and runtime transformations is becoming more important.
I agree. I don't know how relevant libJIT might or might not be for this, but the basic idea of GCC generating deployable code which can be further optimized at run-time (presumably using some kind of JIT) is certainly a good one. I believe that's a usage model that will become increasingly important over time. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
