On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Joe Buck wrote: > When there is traffic, the SC gets to spend time arguing with RMS. Oh, joy.
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Tom Tromey wrote: > Recently I've been thinking: let's have a periodic election for a > developer ombudsman member on the SC, someone who could summarize > (to the extent possible) SC happenings, much as the RMs do now for > releases. I think you will be surprised how little (let alone: interesting) goes on there. I can understand what you are saying, though, and will raise a proposal to compile and share a (bi-)monthly report on the SC list which I volunteer to create. Gerald
