Mark Mitchell wrote:
I have now reviewed the suggestions. Here is the mail that I plan to
recommend to the SC. (Of course, I can't guarantee what the SC will do
with it.) I've tried to take into account most of the feedback.
However, I've tried to note all of these suggestions in my draft
I wrote:
> [A]utomatic reports for [*-*-freebsd] came in daily,
> almost-like-clockwork from mid-2002 until October 26, 2005. It
> appears that I never updated the population of freebsd.org machines
> to synchronize against the SVN repository rather than CVS... Oops!
> [...] I will attempt to re
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:52:43PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the kind of testing you guys usualy do on simulators -
> however since this is the second time it's mentionned I should say that
> mipsel binaries run just fine in the gxemul simulator.
>
> I've recently don
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:43:53PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I take David's point about mips{,el}-linux-gnu being another alternative.
I suppose mipsisa64-elf has the advantage of being a simulator target
than anyone can test.
I'm not familiar with the ki
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:43:53PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> I take David's point about mips{,el}-linux-gnu being another alternative.
> I suppose mipsisa64-elf has the advantage of being a simulator target
> than anyone can test.
I'm not familiar with the kind of testing you guys usualy d
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> The last time a freebsd testresult was sent to the list from the
> mainline was in May, maybe that is a sign that we should downgrade
> it to secondary from primary.
I have been testing GCC head on FreeBSD on a daily base for years, and
am testing the l
Richard Sandiford wrote:
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew Pinski wrote:
Change powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu to powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu so that
we also require the 64bit of PowerPC to work.
To be clear, you're suggesting that we say
"powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu"
> 2. Downgrade hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 to
> secondary platforms. Update HP-UX to 11.31? Update AIX to 5.3? I like
> having these platforms in the list, in that the differences in object
> models tend to flush out bugs in GCC, but there doesn't seem to be as
> much in
I'm glad you asked ;) Although you probably won't be.
I must admit I've always felt mips-elf to be a less-than-ideal
replacement for mips-sgi-irix6.5. The former is 32-bit only, while the
latter includes o32, n32 and n64, giving both 32-bit and 64-bit coverage.
I fully agree with removing mip
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:43:53PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> I must admit I've always felt mips-elf to be a less-than-ideal
> replacement for mips-sgi-irix6.5. The former is 32-bit only, while the
> latter includes o32, n32 and n64, giving both 32-bit and 64-bit coverage.
> I fully agree w
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> Change powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu to powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu so that
>> we also require the 64bit of PowerPC to work.
>
> To be clear, you're suggesting that we say
> "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu", but mean that both it's 32-b
Mike Stump wrote:
On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:11 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
4. Replace powerpc-apple-darwin with i686-apple-darwin. Apple's
hardware switch would seem to make the PowerPC variant less interesting.
I'd rather just add i686-apple-darwin as a secondary. We don't
instantly replace the e
> I'd rather just add i686-apple-darwin as a secondary. We don't
> instantly replace the entire installed base of machines in the world.
No, but the relevant criteria isn't whether a given machine is *used*,
but whether the people who are using it are likely to want to upgrade to
a new version
On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:11 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
4. Replace powerpc-apple-darwin with i686-apple-darwin. Apple's
hardware switch would seem to make the PowerPC variant less
interesting.
I'd rather just add i686-apple-darwin as a secondary. We don't
instantly replace the entire installed
>
> If retaining primary platform status requires the setup or restart of
> automatic reporting then I suggest that the SC require it for all the
> primary platforms and not just i386-unknown-freebsd. Regardless, I
> will attempt to restart automatic daily reporting for i386-unknown-freebsd.
I a
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:21 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> i386-unknown-freebsd
> Stupid mail client send this before I was finished.
> The last time a freebsd testresult was sent to the list from the
> mainline was in May, maybe that is a sign that we should downgrade it to
> secondary from pr
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 23:11 -0400, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Reactions?
Change powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu to powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu so that
we also require the 64bit of PowerPC to work.
To be clear, you're suggesting that we say
"powerpc64-unknown-
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:11 PM
> To: GCC
> Subject: GCC 4.3 Platform List
> 5. Add i686-mingw32 as a secondary platform.
>
> Reactions?
I think that adding mingw32 as a secondary is a good thing, and
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > 3. Update sparc-sun-solaris2.9 to sparc64-sun-solaris2.10?
>
> No strong opinion on the Solaris 9 -> Solaris 10 transition, but why switching
> to a 64-bit compiler? The 32-bit compiler is multilib by default on Solaris
> and AFAIK the vendor compiler
> 3. Update sparc-sun-solaris2.9 to sparc64-sun-solaris2.10?
No strong opinion on the Solaris 9 -> Solaris 10 transition, but why switching
to a 64-bit compiler? The 32-bit compiler is multilib by default on Solaris
and AFAIK the vendor compiler is still 32-bit too.
--
Eric Botcazou
Mark Mitchell wrote:
1. Replace arm-none-elf with arm-none-eabi. Most of the ARM community
has switched to using the EABI.
2. Downgrade hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 to
secondary platforms. Update HP-UX to 11.31? Update AIX to 5.3? I
like having these platforms in the
Jack Howarth wrote:
Since Apple is committed (at least in their advertising)
to provide 64-bit development tools for both PPC and Intel
in Leopard, it would seem a tad premature to downgrade the
powerpc-apple-darwin in favor of i686-apple-darwin for 4.3.
I think maybe it's best, after my i
> On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:21 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > i386-unknown-freebsd
>
> The last time a freebsd testresult was sent to the list from the
> mainline was in May, maybe that is a sign that we should downgrade it to
> secondary from primary.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
I've got an i38
Andrew Pinski wrote:
The last time a freebsd testresult was sent to the list from the
mainline was in May, maybe that is a sign that we should downgrade it to
secondary from primary.
I personally have no opinion about FreeBSD; I don't feel I know enough
to say anything sensible. However, the
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 23:11 -0400, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Reactions?
Change powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu to powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu so that
we also require the 64bit of PowerPC to work.
To be clear, you're suggesting that we say
"powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu", but mean t
Mark,
Since Apple is committed (at least in their advertising)
to provide 64-bit development tools for both PPC and Intel
in Leopard, it would seem a tad premature to downgrade the
powerpc-apple-darwin in favor of i686-apple-darwin for 4.3.
Why not just upgrade i686-apple-darwin to a secondary
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:21 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > i386-unknown-freebsd
Stupid mail client send this before I was finished.
The last time a freebsd testresult was sent to the list from the
mainline was in May, maybe that is a sign that we should downgrade it to
secondary from primary.
T
Mark Mitchell wrote:
My proposed changes:
1. Replace arm-none-elf with arm-none-eabi. Most of the ARM community
has switched to using the EABI.
2. Downgrade hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 to
secondary platforms. Update HP-UX to 11.31? Update AIX to 5.3? I like
having
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 23:11 -0400, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Reactions?
Change powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu to powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu so that
we also require the 64bit of PowerPC to work. In the same way,
I would remove i686-pc-linux-gnu as x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu should
represent both.
> 2. Dow
29 matches
Mail list logo
