files in (at least) two archives in https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/ contain case-sensitive file names

2024-08-28 Thread Rob Groen via Gcc
Hello, From https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/ I recently downloaded gnat_rm-html.tar.gz and gnat_ugn-html.tar.gz. In both archives there are filenames that are case-sensitive, e.g. index.html and Index.html. This is fine for Unix/Linux users but not workable for MSWindows users. Is

Let me know the post Price? https://gcc.gnu.org/

2024-05-14 Thread Povel Smith via Gcc
*Hi Sir!* *Can you lived my post with a do-follow link on your site? * *What is the post price?* *Link insertion* price *General Post * price *Casino ,Vape CBD * price *Waiting for your positive response* *Thanks & Regards.*

Re: Website https://gcc.gnu.org/ down

2023-03-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Damian, On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 07:30:14AM +0100, Damian Tometzki wrote: > the website and git https://gcc.gnu.org/ is down ? > > Any info about it ? The site isn't down, but there is an issue (ddos?) with the fsf dns servers for gnu.org. The FSF tech team announces downtime

Website https://gcc.gnu.org/ down

2023-03-25 Thread Damian Tometzki
Hello together, the website and git https://gcc.gnu.org/ is down ? Any info about it ? best regards Damian

Re: [wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

2022-12-19 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 16:54, U.Mutlu wrote: > > On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except > C++03: > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html > > This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c++03 and > -std=gn

Re: [wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

2022-12-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
of gcc/g++ are listed, >> except C++03: >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html >> >> >> >> This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options >> -std=c++03 >> >> and -std=gnu++03 >> > >> > C++03 is

Re: [wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

2022-12-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, 19:50 U.Mutlu, wrote: > Jakub Jelinek wrote on 12/15/22 17:59: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:19PM +0100, U.Mutlu wrote: > >> On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, > except C++03: > >> https://gcc.gn

Re: [wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

2022-12-15 Thread U.Mutlu
Jakub Jelinek wrote on 12/15/22 17:59: On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:19PM +0100, U.Mutlu wrote: On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except C++03: https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c

Re: [wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

2022-12-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:19PM +0100, U.Mutlu wrote: > On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except > C++03: > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html > > This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c++03 > and -

[wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

2022-12-15 Thread U.Mutlu
On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except C++03: https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c++03 and -std=gnu++03

Question about https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138

2022-06-12 Thread Oliver Clinton via Gcc
Hey I’m Olive and I run a file sharing service called SendBig.com where you can send files up to 30GB for Free with amazing features available. I stumbled upon your website https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138 , and I just have to say: WOW! I had a quick proposal, I was

Re: Comment on web page https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx11

2021-12-04 Thread Dr . Jürgen Sauermann
On 12/3/21 9:12 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Fri, 3 Dec 2021, 18:58 Dr. Jürgen Sauermann, mailto:m...@juergen-sauermann.de>> wrote: Hi, not sure if this matters or how int can be fixed, but today I observed the following: Your web page says that "Static assertions" are

Re: Comment on web page https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx11

2021-12-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021, 18:58 Dr. Jürgen Sauermann, wrote: > Hi, > > not sure if this matters or how int can be fixed, but today I observed > the following: > > Your web page says that "Static assertions" are supported by GCC since > version 4.3. > > Today I tried to use "Static assertions" on an av

Comment on web page https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx11

2021-12-03 Thread Dr . Jürgen Sauermann
Hi, not sure if this matters or how int can be fixed, but today I observed the following: Your web page says that "Static assertions" are supported by GCC since version 4.3. Today I tried to use "Static assertions" on an  avr-g++ resp. avr-gcc which identifies itself as: eedjsa@server68:

[patch, committed] fortran/intrinsic.texi: Fix copy'n'paste errors and typos (was: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gfortran/)

2021-05-25 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi Johannes, hi all, On 24.05.21 23:21, Johannes Nendwich wrote: some more suggestions for corrections in the onlinedocs: thanks for the proof reading. I have converted it into a patch and committed it as attached. Tobias - Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstrasse 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gfortran/

2021-05-24 Thread Johannes Nendwich via Gcc
Hi folks, some more suggestions for corrections in the onlinedocs: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gfortran/GERROR.html#GERROR RESULT "Shall of type CHARACTER and of default" --> "Shall BE of ... default KIND." https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1

You can live our sponsor post on your site at https://gcc.gnu.org/

2020-11-01 Thread wiliam prince via Gcc
*HI SIr * *You can live our sponsor post on your site at*https://gcc.gnu.org/ *What is a sponsor post for your site but we need a do-follow link also.* *what is price also for you write article * *and me write article * *Waiting? *

https://gcc.gnu.org/

2020-10-22 Thread Annie J.Seay via Gcc
Hello. I need your this site for guest posting. This time my budget is low. So i can pay you 10$ each post. So please accepted my offer i send you article soon.

Re: I want to post on your this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ For Guest posting

2020-08-26 Thread maticulous via Gcc
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 7:46 PM, aqib yasin via Gcc wrote: > I want to post on your this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ please tell > > me price, > > > > Waiting for your positive response, > > > > Thanks, > >

I want to post on your this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ For Guest posting

2020-08-26 Thread aqib yasin via Gcc
I want to post on your this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ please tell me price, Waiting for your positive response, Thanks,

i need this site https://gcc.gnu.org/

2020-08-22 Thread Javeed butt via Gcc
i need this site https://gcc.gnu.org/

Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/

2020-02-28 Thread Jonathan Wakely
omebody to post their stupid, spammy, SEO-junk articles on our website. Obviously we don't let idiot spammers post articles on our site, but they're idiots and don't understand that. You should read https://gcc.gnu.org/spam.html though.

Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/

2020-02-27 Thread maticulous
fie blake > wrote: > > > Hi sir, > > Please tell me price, > > I need the post on this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ > > < > https://signtr.info/tracker/click?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2F&dID=1582795373536&linkName=https://gcc.gnu.org/ > > &

Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/

2020-02-27 Thread Alfie blake
Hi any update On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:30, Alfie blake wrote: > Hi sir, > Please tell me price, > I need the post on this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ > <https://signtr.info/tracker/click?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2F&dID=1582795373536&linkName=https://gcc.gnu.o

Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/

2020-02-27 Thread Alfie blake
Hi sir, Please tell me price, I need the post on this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ <https://signtr.info/tracker/click?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2F&dID=1582795373536&linkName=https://gcc.gnu.org/> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:22, Alfie blake wrote: > > *Hi Sir,What is th

what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/

2020-02-27 Thread Alfie blake
*Hi Sir,What is the post price of this site?* https://gcc.gnu.org/ <https://signtr.info/tracker/click?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2F&dID=1582795373536&linkName=https://gcc.gnu.org/> *Tell me price of,* *Existing Post Link?* *Normal Post?Casino Post?waiting for your reply.*

We are looking this website for post-https://gcc.gnu.org/

2019-11-06 Thread MoizImran
HI Sir We are looking this website for post-https://gcc.gnu.org/ I am working from some years and our company is well reputed. We have lots of clients for whom we are working. our client need good sites with the following features Alex Rank - Less than 100 OR DA 50+ Sites so please send

I am interested in posting on your blog…https://gcc.gnu.org/

2019-11-05 Thread samra malik
Hi! > I am interested in posting on your blog… https://gcc.gnu.org/ > need to know some things in advance before I include your site in my > offer:1. Final and flat best rates per post. > 2. Type of links (dofollow). > 3. Do you accept easy writing article > 4. Donot add dis

Regarding Bug 85539 - x86_64: loads are not always narrowed [https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85539]

2019-05-20 Thread navya deepika Garakapati
Hi All, I am looking https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85539 bug and did some analysis. please help me on the below query. For the below testcase, $cat test.c int foo(long *p) { return *p; } when compile with clang -O2 $clang test.c -O2 -S $cat test.s foo

regarding https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89924

2019-05-15 Thread kamlesh kumar
Hi devs, I am looking into subjected issue. consider below testcase. $test.cpp class A { public: virtual int value() { return 1; } }; class B final : public A { public: int value(){ return 2; } }; int test(A* b) { return b->value() + 11; } void foo_test(B*b) { test(b); } Here gcc is u

Regarding Bug 85539 - x86_64: loads are not always narrowed [https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85539]

2019-05-05 Thread navya deepika Garakapati
Hi All, For the below testcase, $cat test.c int foo(long *p) { return *p; } when compile with clang -O2 $clang test.c -O2 -S $cat test.s foo: movl(%rdi), %eax retq while gcc gives $gcc test.c -O2 -S $cat test.s foo: movq(%rdi), %rax

Re: broken link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for link to "Profile Mode" page:

2017-08-07 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 5 August 2017 at 21:58, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> Thanks for letting us know, I've fixed the link. > > Thanks, Jonathan. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/libstdc++/manua

Re: broken link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for link to "Profile Mode" page:

2017-08-05 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Thanks for letting us know, I've fixed the link. Thanks, Jonathan. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/profile_mode.html ^ Should we do somethi

Re: broken link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for link to "Profile Mode" page:

2017-08-04 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 2 August 2017 at 13:55, Sergei Kurenkov wrote: > Link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for "Profile Mode": > > * The libstdc++ Profile Mode has been deprecated and will be removed > in a future version. > > gives: > > Not Found > > T

broken link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for link to "Profile Mode" page:

2017-08-02 Thread Sergei Kurenkov
Link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for "Profile Mode": * The libstdc++ Profile Mode has been deprecated and will be removed in a future version. gives: Not Found The requested URL /onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/libstdc++/manual/profile_mode.html was not found on this server.

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html

2017-07-11 Thread Jonny Grant
On 11/07/17 09:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 11 July 2017 at 17:51, Jonny Grant wrote: Hello https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html snprintf (d, sizeof d, "%#02x", x & 0xff); ^^ Should be: sizeof(d) ? "The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html

2017-07-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 11 July 2017 at 17:51, Jonny Grant wrote: > Hello > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html > > snprintf (d, sizeof d, "%#02x", x & 0xff); > >^^ > Should be: sizeof(d) ? "The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of its op

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html

2017-07-11 Thread Marek Polacek
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:51:19AM -0700, Jonny Grant wrote: > Hello > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html > > snprintf (d, sizeof d, "%#02x", x & 0xff); > >^^ > Should be: sizeof(d) ? Why? Both are correct. Marek

https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html

2017-07-11 Thread Jonny Grant
Hello https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html snprintf (d, sizeof d, "%#02x", x & 0xff); ^^ Should be: sizeof(d) ? I'm not on this mailing list, so please cc me in any replies Regards, Jonny

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/

2016-08-24 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Jérôme Kunegis wrote: > Dear GCC Web team > > > I just wanted to let you know that on > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/ > > the link to the gcc-6.2 documentation links to the gcc-6.1 documentation Thanks, fixed. Richard. > > Cheers &g

https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/

2016-08-24 Thread Jérôme Kunegis
Dear GCC Web team I just wanted to let you know that on https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/ the link to the gcc-6.2 documentation links to the gcc-6.1 documentation Cheers Jérôme -- Dr. Jérôme Kunegis Institute for Web Science and Technologies University of Koblenz-Landau http://userpages.uni

Re: Documentation complex logarithm https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/LOG.html

2015-06-14 Thread Thomas Koenig
ctly but the online documentation >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/LOG.html gives -pi <= omega <= >> pi. Perhaps this should be corrected. > > Let me redirect this to the fort...@gcc.gnu.org list. Fixed on trunk as obvious after checking that 'make info', 

Re: Documentation complex logarithm https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/LOG.html

2015-06-13 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, C.Friedrich wrote: > The LOG function returns the principal value of the complex logarithm > whose imaginary part omega must be in the range -pi < omega <= pi. > > GFORTRAN does it correctly but the online documentation > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gf

Documentation complex logarithm https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/LOG.html

2015-06-02 Thread C . Friedrich
The LOG function returns the principal value of the complex logarithm whose imaginary part omega must be in the range -pi < omega <= pi. GFORTRAN does it correctly but the online documentation https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/LOG.html gives -pi <= omega <= pi. Perhaps th

Re: Serious Regressions tables on https://gcc.gnu.org

2015-02-13 Thread Jack Howarth
there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by >> >> the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column for the priority >> >> (importance) of each bug? We used to have that and it was quit

Re: Serious Regressions tables on https://gcc.gnu.org

2015-02-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
inks in the 'Release Series and Status' section at > >> https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column for the priority > >> (importance) of each bug? We used to have that and it was quite nice > >> to be able to click on the priority column header to regenerate th

Re: Serious Regressions tables on https://gcc.gnu.org

2015-02-13 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:12:22PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by >> the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at >> https:

Re: Serious Regressions tables on https://gcc.gnu.org

2015-02-13 Thread Marek Polacek
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:12:22PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by > the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at > https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column for the priority > (importance) o

Serious Regressions tables on https://gcc.gnu.org

2015-02-13 Thread Jack Howarth
Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column for the priority (importance) of each bug? We used to have that and it was quite nice to be able to click on th

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-30 Thread Jonathan Wakely
ring, list, > ios_base::failure (are there others?) that have been queued for a while have > been put into gcc5. This is the big release. There was a message > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01669.html (and subsequent) on > this. > Check https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-30 Thread Ed Smith-Rowland
11 ABI changes to string, list, ios_base::failure (are there others?) that have been queued for a while have been put into gcc5. This is the big release. There was a message https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01669.html (and subsequent) on this. Check https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-30 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On 29-12-2014 16:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: The note about C++14 conformance is great as it stands modulo link errors. Why is it great to not mention the experimental qualifier? Do all files / libraries have to be compiled with the same -std option? If so, this option causes ABI issues by its

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-30 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On 29-12-2014 18:36, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 29 December 2014 at 15:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: The note on C++14 conformance referred to is not the place for this but: is our C++11 support really less tested and more experimental than our C++03 support at this point? One thing I can think of

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-29 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 29 December 2014 at 15:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: > The note on C++14 conformance referred to is not the place for this but: is > our C++11 support really less tested and more experimental than our C++03 > support at this point? One thing I can think of might be gcc bootstrap. The main differ

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-29 Thread Ed Smith-Rowland
On 12/27/2014 08:03 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 28 December 2014 at 00:08, Olaf van der Spek wrote: On 26-12-2014 1:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14 language feature

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-27 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 28 December 2014 at 00:08, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On 26-12-2014 1:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GC

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-27 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On 26-12-2014 1:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14 language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist. It should probably be https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/status

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-27 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 27 December 2014 at 19:17, Jonathan Adamczewski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely > wrote: >> >> On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-27 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14 > > language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exi

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > Hi, > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14 > language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist. It should probably be https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/status.html >> Important:

404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-25 Thread Olaf van der Spek
Hi, https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14 language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist. > Important: Because the final ISO C++14 standard was only recently published, GCC's support is experimental. Is C++11 support no longer exper

Re: ssl support for https://gcc.gnu.org/

2014-05-12 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > One complication is the use of literal http://gcc.gnu.org/FOO";...> > type data inside many of the web pages, including the front page. These > should be switched to something like to make them work > both with http and https. I'm pretty sure most

ssl support for https://gcc.gnu.org/

2014-05-12 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - Thanks to help from Lisa Marie Maginnis , we now have a valid ssl/tls certificate for gcc.gnu.org, so the web server now makes https://gcc.gnu.org/* files available. Please let me/overseers know if you see any problems. One complication is the use of literal http://gcc.gnu.org/FOO