Hello,
From https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/ I recently downloaded
gnat_rm-html.tar.gz and gnat_ugn-html.tar.gz. In both archives there are
filenames that are case-sensitive, e.g. index.html and Index.html. This
is fine for Unix/Linux users but not workable for MSWindows users.
Is
*Hi Sir!*
*Can you lived my post with a do-follow link on your site? *
*What is the post price?*
*Link insertion* price
*General Post * price
*Casino ,Vape CBD * price
*Waiting for your positive response*
*Thanks & Regards.*
Hi Damian,
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 07:30:14AM +0100, Damian Tometzki wrote:
> the website and git https://gcc.gnu.org/ is down ?
>
> Any info about it ?
The site isn't down, but there is an issue (ddos?) with the fsf dns
servers for gnu.org. The FSF tech team announces downtime
Hello together,
the website and git https://gcc.gnu.org/ is down ?
Any info about it ?
best regards
Damian
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 16:54, U.Mutlu wrote:
>
> On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except
> C++03:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html
>
> This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c++03 and
> -std=gn
of gcc/g++ are listed,
>> except C++03:
>> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html
>> >>
>> >> This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options
>> -std=c++03
>> >> and -std=gnu++03
>> >
>> > C++03 is
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, 19:50 U.Mutlu, wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote on 12/15/22 17:59:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:19PM +0100, U.Mutlu wrote:
> >> On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed,
> except C++03:
> >> https://gcc.gn
Jakub Jelinek wrote on 12/15/22 17:59:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:19PM +0100, U.Mutlu wrote:
On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except C++03:
https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html
This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:19PM +0100, U.Mutlu wrote:
> On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except
> C++03:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html
>
> This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c++03
> and -
On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except C++03:
https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html
This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c++03 and
-std=gnu++03
Hey
I’m Olive and I run a file sharing service called SendBig.com where you can
send files up to 30GB for Free with amazing features available.
I stumbled upon your website https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
, and I just have to say: WOW!
I had a quick proposal, I was
On 12/3/21 9:12 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021, 18:58 Dr. Jürgen Sauermann,
mailto:m...@juergen-sauermann.de>> wrote:
Hi,
not sure if this matters or how int can be fixed, but today I
observed
the following:
Your web page says that "Static assertions" are
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021, 18:58 Dr. Jürgen Sauermann,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not sure if this matters or how int can be fixed, but today I observed
> the following:
>
> Your web page says that "Static assertions" are supported by GCC since
> version 4.3.
>
> Today I tried to use "Static assertions" on an av
Hi,
not sure if this matters or how int can be fixed, but today I observed
the following:
Your web page says that "Static assertions" are supported by GCC since
version 4.3.
Today I tried to use "Static assertions" on an avr-g++ resp. avr-gcc
which identifies
itself as:
eedjsa@server68:
Hi Johannes, hi all,
On 24.05.21 23:21, Johannes Nendwich wrote:
some more suggestions for corrections in the onlinedocs:
thanks for the proof reading.
I have converted it into a patch and committed it as attached.
Tobias
-
Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstrasse 2
Hi folks,
some more suggestions for corrections in the onlinedocs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gfortran/GERROR.html#GERROR
RESULT "Shall of type CHARACTER and of default"
--> "Shall BE of ... default KIND."
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1
*HI SIr *
*You can live our sponsor post on your site at*https://gcc.gnu.org/
*What is a sponsor post for your site but we need a do-follow link also.*
*what is price also for you write article *
*and me write article *
*Waiting? *
Hello.
I need your this site for guest posting. This time my budget is low. So i
can pay you 10$ each post. So please accepted my offer i send you article
soon.
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 7:46 PM, aqib yasin via Gcc wrote:
> I want to post on your this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ please tell
>
> me price,
>
>
>
> Waiting for your positive response,
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
I want to post on your this site https://gcc.gnu.org/ please tell
me price,
Waiting for your positive response,
Thanks,
i need this site https://gcc.gnu.org/
omebody to post their stupid, spammy, SEO-junk articles on our
website.
Obviously we don't let idiot spammers post articles on our site, but
they're idiots and don't understand that.
You should read https://gcc.gnu.org/spam.html though.
fie blake
> wrote:
>
> > Hi sir,
> > Please tell me price,
> > I need the post on this site https://gcc.gnu.org/
> > <
> https://signtr.info/tracker/click?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2F&dID=1582795373536&linkName=https://gcc.gnu.org/
> >
&
Hi any update
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:30, Alfie blake wrote:
> Hi sir,
> Please tell me price,
> I need the post on this site https://gcc.gnu.org/
> <https://signtr.info/tracker/click?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2F&dID=1582795373536&linkName=https://gcc.gnu.o
Hi sir,
Please tell me price,
I need the post on this site https://gcc.gnu.org/
<https://signtr.info/tracker/click?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2F&dID=1582795373536&linkName=https://gcc.gnu.org/>
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:22, Alfie blake wrote:
>
> *Hi Sir,What is th
*Hi Sir,What is the post price of this site?* https://gcc.gnu.org/
<https://signtr.info/tracker/click?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2F&dID=1582795373536&linkName=https://gcc.gnu.org/>
*Tell me price of,*
*Existing Post Link?*
*Normal Post?Casino Post?waiting for your reply.*
HI Sir
We are looking this website for post-https://gcc.gnu.org/
I am working from some years and our company is well reputed. We have lots
of clients for whom we are working. our client need good sites with the
following features
Alex Rank - Less than 100
OR
DA 50+
Sites so please send
Hi!
> I am interested in posting on your blog… https://gcc.gnu.org/
> need to know some things in advance before I include your site in my
> offer:1. Final and flat best rates per post.
> 2. Type of links (dofollow).
> 3. Do you accept easy writing article
> 4. Donot add dis
Hi All,
I am looking https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85539 bug and did
some analysis.
please help me on the below query.
For the below testcase,
$cat test.c
int foo(long *p)
{
return *p;
}
when compile with clang -O2
$clang test.c -O2 -S
$cat test.s
foo
Hi devs,
I am looking into subjected issue.
consider below testcase.
$test.cpp
class A {
public:
virtual int value() { return 1; }
};
class B final : public A {
public:
int value(){ return 2; }
};
int test(A* b) {
return b->value() + 11;
}
void foo_test(B*b)
{
test(b);
}
Here gcc is u
Hi All,
For the below testcase,
$cat test.c
int foo(long *p)
{
return *p;
}
when compile with clang -O2
$clang test.c -O2 -S
$cat test.s
foo:
movl(%rdi), %eax
retq
while gcc gives
$gcc test.c -O2 -S
$cat test.s
foo:
movq(%rdi), %rax
On 5 August 2017 at 21:58, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Thanks for letting us know, I've fixed the link.
>
> Thanks, Jonathan.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/libstdc++/manua
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Thanks for letting us know, I've fixed the link.
Thanks, Jonathan.
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/profile_mode.html
^
Should we do somethi
On 2 August 2017 at 13:55, Sergei Kurenkov wrote:
> Link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for "Profile Mode":
>
> * The libstdc++ Profile Mode has been deprecated and will be removed
> in a future version.
>
> gives:
>
> Not Found
>
> T
Link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for "Profile Mode":
* The libstdc++ Profile Mode has been deprecated and will be removed
in a future version.
gives:
Not Found
The requested URL
/onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/libstdc++/manual/profile_mode.html was not found
on this server.
On 11/07/17 09:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11 July 2017 at 17:51, Jonny Grant wrote:
Hello
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html
snprintf (d, sizeof d, "%#02x", x & 0xff);
^^
Should be: sizeof(d) ?
"The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of
On 11 July 2017 at 17:51, Jonny Grant wrote:
> Hello
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html
>
> snprintf (d, sizeof d, "%#02x", x & 0xff);
>
>^^
> Should be: sizeof(d) ?
"The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of its op
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:51:19AM -0700, Jonny Grant wrote:
> Hello
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html
>
> snprintf (d, sizeof d, "%#02x", x & 0xff);
>
>^^
> Should be: sizeof(d) ?
Why? Both are correct.
Marek
Hello
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html
snprintf (d, sizeof d, "%#02x", x & 0xff);
^^
Should be: sizeof(d) ?
I'm not on this mailing list, so please cc me in any replies
Regards, Jonny
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Jérôme Kunegis wrote:
> Dear GCC Web team
>
>
> I just wanted to let you know that on
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/
>
> the link to the gcc-6.2 documentation links to the gcc-6.1 documentation
Thanks, fixed.
Richard.
>
> Cheers
&g
Dear GCC Web team
I just wanted to let you know that on
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/
the link to the gcc-6.2 documentation links to the gcc-6.1 documentation
Cheers
Jérôme
--
Dr. Jérôme Kunegis
Institute for Web Science and Technologies
University of Koblenz-Landau
http://userpages.uni
ctly but the online documentation
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/LOG.html gives -pi <= omega <=
>> pi. Perhaps this should be corrected.
>
> Let me redirect this to the fort...@gcc.gnu.org list.
Fixed on trunk as obvious after checking that 'make info',
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, C.Friedrich wrote:
> The LOG function returns the principal value of the complex logarithm
> whose imaginary part omega must be in the range -pi < omega <= pi.
>
> GFORTRAN does it correctly but the online documentation
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gf
The LOG function returns the principal value of the complex logarithm
whose imaginary part omega must be in the range -pi < omega <= pi.
GFORTRAN does it correctly but the online documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/LOG.html gives -pi <= omega <=
pi. Perhaps th
there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by
>> >> the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at
>> >> https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column for the priority
>> >> (importance) of each bug? We used to have that and it was quit
inks in the 'Release Series and Status' section at
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column for the priority
> >> (importance) of each bug? We used to have that and it was quite nice
> >> to be able to click on the priority column header to regenerate th
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:12:22PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by
>> the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at
>> https:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:12:22PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by
> the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at
> https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column for the priority
> (importance) o
Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by
the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at
https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column for the priority
(importance) of each bug? We used to have that and it was quite nice
to be able to click on th
ring, list,
> ios_base::failure (are there others?) that have been queued for a while have
> been put into gcc5. This is the big release. There was a message
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01669.html (and subsequent) on
> this.
> Check https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc
11 ABI changes to string, list,
ios_base::failure (are there others?) that have been queued for a while
have been put into gcc5. This is the big release. There was a message
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01669.html (and
subsequent) on this.
Check https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat
On 29-12-2014 16:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
The note about C++14 conformance is great as it stands modulo link errors.
Why is it great to not mention the experimental qualifier?
Do all files / libraries have to be compiled with the same -std option?
If so, this option causes ABI issues by its
On 29-12-2014 18:36, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29 December 2014 at 15:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
The note on C++14 conformance referred to is not the place for this but: is
our C++11 support really less tested and more experimental than our C++03
support at this point? One thing I can think of
On 29 December 2014 at 15:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> The note on C++14 conformance referred to is not the place for this but: is
> our C++11 support really less tested and more experimental than our C++03
> support at this point? One thing I can think of might be gcc bootstrap.
The main differ
On 12/27/2014 08:03 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28 December 2014 at 00:08, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 26-12-2014 1:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14
language feature
On 28 December 2014 at 00:08, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 26-12-2014 1:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GC
On 26-12-2014 1:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14
language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist.
It should probably be https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/status
On 27 December 2014 at 19:17, Jonathan Adamczewski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
>>
>> On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14
> > language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exi
On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14
> language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist.
It should probably be https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/status.html
>> Important:
Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14
language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist.
> Important: Because the final ISO C++14 standard was only recently
published, GCC's support is experimental.
Is C++11 support no longer exper
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> One complication is the use of literal http://gcc.gnu.org/FOO";...>
> type data inside many of the web pages, including the front page. These
> should be switched to something like to make them work
> both with http and https.
I'm pretty sure most
Hi -
Thanks to help from Lisa Marie Maginnis , we now have a
valid ssl/tls certificate for gcc.gnu.org, so the web server now makes
https://gcc.gnu.org/* files available. Please let me/overseers know if
you see any problems.
One complication is the use of literal http://gcc.gnu.org/FOO
63 matches
Mail list logo