On 28 December 2014 at 00:08, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On 26-12-2014 1:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14 >>> language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist. >> >> >> It should probably be https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/status.html
(As already said, I meant https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html there) > > I don't think that's right, it should link to a page like > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/ Ah, I don't think that will exist until it's released. > >>>> Important: Because the final ISO C++14 standard was only recently >>>> published, GCC's support is experimental. >>> >>> >>> Is C++11 support no longer experimental? >> >> >> That hasn't changed yet, but it should be announced on >> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/status.html when it does. > > > Okay, but shouldn't that be reflected in the announcement? > I doesn't mention the experimental status at all. Which announcement, the C++14 one? Why should that say anything about the status of C++11?
