Re: testsuite execution question

2005-03-04 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:33:47PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:35:54PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:29:45AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote: > > > Is command line processing relevant for embedded targets? (I have no > > > idea.) Tests that

Re: testsuite execution question

2005-03-04 Thread Janis Johnson
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:35:54PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:29:45AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote: > > Is command line processing relevant for embedded targets? (I have no > > idea.) Tests that pass options to the test program could be skipped > > for embedded tar

Re: testsuite execution question

2005-03-01 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:29:45AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote: > Is command line processing relevant for embedded targets? (I have no > idea.) Tests that pass options to the test program could be skipped > for embedded targets and for other kinds of testing where it isn't > reliable. The dg-prog

Re: testsuite execution question

2005-03-01 Thread Janis Johnson
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:45:17PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:14:12PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote: > > > DejaGnu's definition of ${tool}_load has an optional argument for flags > > > to pass to the test program, but none of the procedures in DejaGnu or in > > > gcc/

Re: testsuite execution question

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:14:12PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote: > > DejaGnu's definition of ${tool}_load has an optional argument for flags > > to pass to the test program, but none of the procedures in DejaGnu or in > > gcc/testsuite/* are set up to pass such flags. It would be fairly > > straight

Re: testsuite execution question

2005-02-28 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:59:52PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:14:04PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > at the top of the program to have dejagnu execute the > > the a.out file. But, I want to execute "a.out 1 2 3". > > Is this possible? I tried looking through gcc.

Re: testsuite execution question

2005-02-28 Thread Janis Johnson
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:59:52PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:14:04PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > I would like to write a short program to test the > > command line parsing of gfortran. I know I can add > > > > ! {dg-do run} > > > > at the top of the program to ha

Re: testsuite execution question

2005-02-28 Thread Janis Johnson
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:14:04PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > I would like to write a short program to test the > command line parsing of gfortran. I know I can add > > ! {dg-do run} > > at the top of the program to have dejagnu execute the > the a.out file. But, I want to execute "a.out 1 2 3