Eric Botcazou schrieb:
>> From my understanding a "real" insn is an insn that leads to code that will
>> be executed like INSN, CALL_INSN or JUMP_INSN but not DEBUG_INSN that's
>> used for location tracking or shipping debug information or CODE_LABEL or
>> whatever.
>>
>> This means that next_real_
> From my understanding a "real" insn is an insn that leads to code that will
> be executed like INSN, CALL_INSN or JUMP_INSN but not DEBUG_INSN that's
> used for location tracking or shipping debug information or CODE_LABEL or
> whatever.
>
> This means that next_real_insn depends on -g? And that
In rtl.h there is
/* Predicate yielding nonzero iff X is a real insn. */
#define INSN_P(X) \
(NONJUMP_INSN_P (X) || DEBUG_INSN_P (X) || JUMP_P (X) || CALL_P (X))
and in emit-rtl:
/* Return the last INSN, CALL_INSN or JUMP_INSN before INSN;
or 0, if there is none. This routine does not lo
