Eric Botcazou schrieb: >> From my understanding a "real" insn is an insn that leads to code that will >> be executed like INSN, CALL_INSN or JUMP_INSN but not DEBUG_INSN that's >> used for location tracking or shipping debug information or CODE_LABEL or >> whatever. >> >> This means that next_real_insn depends on -g? And that I have to write my >> own next really_real_insn? > > Try prev_active_insn/next_active_insn.
Ahh, yes. That looks fine. :-) Thanks Eric
