> From my understanding a "real" insn is an insn that leads to code that will > be executed like INSN, CALL_INSN or JUMP_INSN but not DEBUG_INSN that's > used for location tracking or shipping debug information or CODE_LABEL or > whatever. > > This means that next_real_insn depends on -g? And that I have to write my > own next really_real_insn?
Try prev_active_insn/next_active_insn. -- Eric Botcazou