> From my understanding a "real" insn is an insn that leads to code that will
> be executed like INSN, CALL_INSN or JUMP_INSN but not DEBUG_INSN that's
> used for location tracking or shipping debug information or CODE_LABEL or
> whatever.
>
> This means that next_real_insn depends on -g? And that I have to write my
> own next really_real_insn?

Try prev_active_insn/next_active_insn.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Reply via email to