Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression.

2007-02-01 Thread David Daney
Andrew Haley wrote: David Daney writes: > Tom Tromey wrote: > >> "David" == David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > David> The call to _ZN4java4lang6ObjectC1Ev is being generated as non-pic, > > David> even though that symbol is defined in libgcj.so. The assembler and > > Dav

Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression.

2007-02-01 Thread Andrew Haley
David Daney writes: > Tom Tromey wrote: > >> "David" == David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > David> The call to _ZN4java4lang6ObjectC1Ev is being generated as non-pic, > > David> even though that symbol is defined in libgcj.so. The assembler and > > David> linker conspire to

Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression.

2007-01-31 Thread David Daney
Tom Tromey wrote: "David" == David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> The call to _ZN4java4lang6ObjectC1Ev is being generated as non-pic, David> even though that symbol is defined in libgcj.so. The assembler and David> linker conspire to jump to address 0x for this call. Could a

Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression.

2007-01-31 Thread David Daney
David Daney wrote: David Daney wrote: Andrew Haley wrote: David Daney writes: > Richard, > > Sometime between 1/7 and 1/16 on the trunk I started getting wrong code > on a bunch of java testcases under mipsel-linux. OK, it was r120621 (The gcj-elipse branch merge) where things started b

Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression.

2007-01-31 Thread David Daney
David Daney wrote: Andrew Haley wrote: David Daney writes: > Richard, > > Sometime between 1/7 and 1/16 on the trunk I started getting wrong code > on a bunch of java testcases under mipsel-linux. OK, it was r120621 (The gcj-elipse branch merge) where things started being broken. There

Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression.

2007-01-31 Thread David Daney
Andrew Haley wrote: David Daney writes: > Richard, > > Sometime between 1/7 and 1/16 on the trunk I started getting wrong code > on a bunch of java testcases under mipsel-linux. > > It looks related to (but not necessarily caused by) this patch: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2

Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression.

2007-01-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "David" == David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> The call to _ZN4java4lang6ObjectC1Ev is being generated as non-pic, David> even though that symbol is defined in libgcj.so. The assembler and David> linker conspire to jump to address 0x for this call. Could also be the prob

Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression.

2007-01-31 Thread Andrew Haley
David Daney writes: > Richard, > > Sometime between 1/7 and 1/16 on the trunk I started getting wrong code > on a bunch of java testcases under mipsel-linux. > > It looks related to (but not necessarily caused by) this patch: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01346.html

Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression.

2007-01-30 Thread Richard Sandiford
David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sometime between 1/7 and 1/16 on the trunk I started getting wrong code > on a bunch of java testcases under mipsel-linux. > > It looks related to (but not necessarily caused by) this patch: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01346.html > > F

MIPS Wrong-code regression.

2007-01-30 Thread David Daney
Richard, Sometime between 1/7 and 1/16 on the trunk I started getting wrong code on a bunch of java testcases under mipsel-linux. It looks related to (but not necessarily caused by) this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01346.html For example if we examine the assembler ou