David Daney writes: > Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>>> "David" == David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > David> The call to _ZN4java4lang6ObjectC1Ev is being generated as non-pic, > > David> even though that symbol is defined in libgcj.so. The assembler and > > David> linker conspire to jump to address 0x00000000 for this call. > > > > Could also be the problem reported at the end of: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30606 > > > > Tom > > I suspect it is the same problem. APH's patch would not have fixed it > if it were.
OK. Does your patch work? If it does, I'm going to trace through jc1 to see if I can find the real origin of this regression. TVM, Andrew.
