Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hi David,
David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard and others,
I have a (still broken) patch that tries to fix the fallout from the
change in semantics of the __sync_nand faimily of builtins that occurred
recently on the trunk.
If someone else is working o
Hi David,
David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard and others,
>
> I have a (still broken) patch that tries to fix the fallout from the
> change in semantics of the __sync_nand faimily of builtins that occurred
> recently on the trunk.
>
> If someone else is working on this and is rea
Richard and others,
I have a (still broken) patch that tries to fix the fallout from the
change in semantics of the __sync_nand faimily of builtins that occurred
recently on the trunk.
If someone else is working on this and is ready to commit, I would
abandon my patch, otherwise we will pre
