Hi David, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard and others, > > I have a (still broken) patch that tries to fix the fallout from the > change in semantics of the __sync_nand faimily of builtins that occurred > recently on the trunk. > > If someone else is working on this and is ready to commit, I would > abandon my patch, otherwise we will press on with it. > > The main point of this message is to try to avoid duplication of effort.
Thanks for asking. TBH, I was getting to the same point: I'd done a quick local hack, realised it wasn't enough, and was gearing up to ask whether it was worth continuing or not. I then got sidetracked by the other testsuite stuff I'm doing. So if you're happy to press ahead with your patch, that'd be great from my POV, thanks. Richard
