Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hi David,
David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard and others,
I have a (still broken) patch that tries to fix the fallout from the
change in semantics of the __sync_nand faimily of builtins that occurred
recently on the trunk.
If someone else is working on this and is ready to commit, I would
abandon my patch, otherwise we will press on with it.
The main point of this message is to try to avoid duplication of effort.
Thanks for asking. TBH, I was getting to the same point: I'd done a quick
local hack, realised it wasn't enough, and was gearing up to ask whether
it was worth continuing or not. I then got sidetracked by the other
testsuite stuff I'm doing.
So if you're happy to press ahead with your patch, that'd be great
from my POV, thanks.
OK, I will work on mine more. Really, how hard could it be? I am
surprised my first attempt failed as usually I never have bugs :-)
David Daney
