Re: Disabling Secondary Tests

2011-06-09 Thread Lawrence Crowl
On 6/9/11, Janis Johnson wrote: > On 06/09/2011 01:30 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> On 6/9/11, Janis Johnson wrote: >>> On 06/08/2011 01:54 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: On 6/6/11, Janis Johnson wrote: > On 06/03/2011 11:14 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> The PPH project has tests that comp

Re: Disabling Secondary Tests

2011-06-09 Thread Janis Johnson
On 06/09/2011 01:30 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > On 6/9/11, Janis Johnson wrote: >> On 06/08/2011 01:54 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >>> On 6/6/11, Janis Johnson wrote: On 06/03/2011 11:14 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > The PPH project has tests that compile two different ways, and > then c

Re: Disabling Secondary Tests

2011-06-09 Thread Lawrence Crowl
On 6/9/11, Janis Johnson wrote: > On 06/08/2011 01:54 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> On 6/6/11, Janis Johnson wrote: >>> On 06/03/2011 11:14 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: The PPH project has tests that compile two different ways, and then compare the assembly. If either of the compiles fails

Re: Disabling Secondary Tests

2011-06-09 Thread Janis Johnson
On 06/08/2011 01:54 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > On 6/6/11, Janis Johnson wrote: >> On 06/03/2011 11:14 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >>> The PPH project has tests that compile two different ways, and >>> then compare the assembly. If either of the compiles fails, the >>> comparison will fail. We'd l

Re: Disabling Secondary Tests

2011-06-08 Thread Lawrence Crowl
On 6/6/11, Janis Johnson wrote: > On 06/03/2011 11:14 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> The PPH project has tests that compile two different ways, and >> then compare the assembly. If either of the compiles fails, the >> comparison will fail. We'd like to simply not run the comparison. >> >> We curre

Re: Disabling Secondary Tests

2011-06-06 Thread Janis Johnson
On 06/03/2011 11:14 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > The PPH project has tests that compile two different ways, and > then compare the assembly. If either of the compiles fails, the > comparison will fail. We'd like to simply not run the comparison. > > We currently have: > > set have_errs [llength

Re: Disabling Secondary Tests

2011-06-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Lawrence Crowl writes: > The PPH project has tests that compile two different ways, and > then compare the assembly. If either of the compiles fails, the > comparison will fail. We'd like to simply not run the comparison. > > We currently have: > > set have_errs [llength [grep $test "{\[ \t\]\+

Disabling Secondary Tests

2011-06-03 Thread Lawrence Crowl
The PPH project has tests that compile two different ways, and then compare the assembly. If either of the compiles fails, the comparison will fail. We'd like to simply not run the comparison. We currently have: set have_errs [llength [grep $test "{\[ \t\]\+dg-error\[\t\]\+.*\[ \t\]\+}"]] # Com