Sounds great, thanks for sharing!
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Yunfeng ZHANG wrote:
> Hi all:
> I'm pleased to announce my gcc plugin on gcc-4.6.3 has been released, it
> collects data from gcc compilation stage and dump them to sqlite-database just
> like cscope, but with later enhancement.
>
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> Alternatively, inform the user that -save-temps is ignored and continue ...
> (I can see people annoyed by foreign Makefiles and tying to get at
> preprocessed
> source with CFLAGS="... -save-temps")
that also makes sense, and would be mor
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Creating the temp file yourself has the advantage you know what the
> name is, whereas if GCC creates it you need to look for new files or
> check timestamps to find what name it used.
so we can have three options that I would suggest :
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 29 October 2012 09:25, Mike Dupont wrote:
>> Well in this case, what about a random temp file name? tmpfile ?
>> something with the timestamp as well.
>> I would like to have those files if possible. would that b
Well in this case, what about a random temp file name? tmpfile ?
something with the timestamp as well.
I would like to have those files if possible. would that be acceptable?
mike
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Mike Dupont wrote:
>
>
using a very recent : gcc version 4.8.0 20121021 (experimental) (GCC)
h4ck3rm1k3@gcc10:~/experiments/build/glibc$ echo "int x;" | g++
-save-temps -x c -
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-.i’
this causes problems compiling glibc with -save-temps.
is this known? should I report a bu
Hi there,
on the gcc buildfarm :
/home/h4ck3rm1k3/experiments/gcc-build/
I am having problems with a standard build of the gcc using the 4.5.1 compiler.
1. ./morestack.vis:1: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is `:'
h4ck3rm1k3@gcc10:~/experiments/gcc-build/x86_64-unknown-li
Hi,
I think what you want is a custom allocator :
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bk01pt04ch11.html
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_45_0/doc/html/interprocess/allocators_containers.html
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2439536/strategy-to-allocate-free-lots-of-small-objects
hope t
thanks for sharing, will check this out.
mike
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:05 PM, James Courtier-Dutton
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know most compilers go from AST to CFG.
> I am writing a decompiler, so I was wondering if anyone knew of any
> documents describing how best to get from CFG to AST.
> The decom
to be clear,
I have also tried in the distant past do some C++ compilation of the
gcc. I had some ideas for making c++ interfaces to the classes and
some code. Also for converting some macros into inline functions for
type safety.
mike
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Mike Dupont
wrote
Thats great,
I have also tried in the distant past do so C++ compilation. Will have
to get back on the bandwagon.
mike
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> I have committed rev 190402, which merges the cxx-conversion branch into
> trunk. Thanks to everyone who provided revie
Thats very interesting, thanks for sharing.
mike
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Yes, my topic sounds crazy huh? But you guys made it possible when you
> started optimizing out constant function pointers. (Thank you!!) This
> didn't mature to "full power" until 4.6.? (wor
12 matches
Mail list logo
