On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 October 2012 09:25, Mike Dupont wrote: >> Well in this case, what about a random temp file name? tmpfile ? >> something with the timestamp as well. >> I would like to have those files if possible. would that be acceptable? > > Why not just write the source to the temp file then invoke GCC on it? Well I considered that. It would be a trivial change to the glibc makefile, in many places.
> Why add that into GCC itself when it's trivial to do externally? well i thought it might be a useful feature, what about allowing the user to speficy the filename and if it is missing, then we can abort? -- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3 Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3
