On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> For purpose of --coverage I would like to distinguish lambda functions
> among DECL_ARTIFICIAL functions.
I'm curious, why?
Jason
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 14:49 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've recently touched AWK option generate machinery and it's quite
> unpleasant
> to make any adjustments. My question is simple: can we starting using
> a scripting
> language like Python and replace usage of the AWK scripts? It's
>
> On Jul 17, 2018, at 8:23 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I've recently touched AWK option generate machinery and it's quite
>>> unpleasant to make any adjustments. My question is simple: can we
>>> starting using a scripting language like Python and replace usage
>>> of
>>> the A
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 16:37 -0400, David Niklas wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've recently touched AWK option generate machinery and it's quite
> > unpleasant to make any adjustments. My question is simple: can we
> > starting using a scripting language like Python and replace usage
> > of
> > the AWK s
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 19:13 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
> In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-07/msg00233.html Martin Liška
> wrote:
>
> > I've recently touched AWK option generate machinery and it's quite
> > unpleasant
> > to make any adjustments. My question is simple:
> Hi.
>
> I've recently touched AWK option generate machinery and it's quite
> unpleasant to make any adjustments. My question is simple: can we
> starting using a scripting language like Python and replace usage of
> the AWK scripts? It's probably question for Steering committee, but I
> would li
Hi!
The OpenMP 5.0 public draft is available at:
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/openmp-TR7.pdf
in case anybody would like to read it, comment on it, or help with the
implementation. Given the huge amount of work, I doubt everything can be
implemented for GCC 9, so we'll likely have jus
Hello All,
In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-07/msg00233.html Martin Liška wrote:
I've recently touched AWK option generate machinery and it's quite unpleasant
to make any adjustments. My question is simple: can we starting using a
scripting
language like Python and replace usage of the AWK
> On Jul 17, 2018, at 9:38 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
>> ...
>> lldb? eh ... ;)
Yes, gdb is hard to make work on Mac OS.
>> anyhow, this is
>>
>> namespace std
>> {
>>
>> # 56
>> "/Users/pkoning/Documents/svn/buildpdp/pdp11-aout/libstdc++-v3/include/type_traits"
>> 3
>> template
>>
This message (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-07/msg00233.html) just reminder
me about my idea to allow using JavaScript with regular expression with
connection to C preprocessor to make things easier in C? For example - define
macro-definition, with adds builds structure definition based on inf
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:36 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:08 PM Paul Koning wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 17, 2018, at 5:46 AM, Richard Biener
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> ...
> > >
> > > There is not enough information for anyone to help you without
> > > reproducing the i
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:08 PM Paul Koning wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 17, 2018, at 5:46 AM, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >
> >> ...
> >
> > There is not enough information for anyone to help you without
> > reproducing the issue which is maybe too much to ask for ;)
> >
> > Can you debug_tree () the
On 07/16/2018 05:44 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As suggested I have created command line option -optimized=[none,
> blocks, stats, vops] to dump the respective gimple bodies of all
> functions.
>
> for example:
>
> -optimized=blocks will dump
Hi.
The name does not make much sense
Hi.
I've recently touched AWK option generate machinery and it's quite unpleasant
to make any adjustments. My question is simple: can we starting using a
scripting
language like Python and replace usage of the AWK scripts? It's probably
question
for Steering committee, but I would like to see fe
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 07/16/2018 06:09 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > On 07/16/2018 12:04 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> >> Just use a spare bit in function_decl, then we can simply stream it.
> >
> > If there's one, then sure. (you've reminded me that there a
On 07/16/2018 06:09 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 07/16/2018 12:04 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> Just use a spare bit in function_decl, then we can simply stream it.
>
> If there's one, then sure. (you've reminded me that there are a bunch of
> mutually disjoint flags in function_decl that co
Will do, thanks.
Thanks
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018, 3:24 PM Ramana Radhakrishnan <
ramana@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Umesh Kalappa
> wrote:
> > Hi Nagy,
> >
> > Please help us with your comments on the attached patch for the issue
> > (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Umesh Kalappa
wrote:
> Hi Nagy,
>
> Please help us with your comments on the attached patch for the issue
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86512)
>
> Thank you and waiting for your inputs on the same.
Patches should be sent to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 5:20 AM Michael Ploujnikov
wrote:
>
> On 2018-07-16 04:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:19 AM Michael Ploujnikov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2018-07-04 04:52 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:09 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> >>>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:30 PM Paul Koning wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 13, 2018, at 3:12 PM, U.Mutlu wrote:
> >
> > Paul Koning wrote on 07/13/2018 08:56 PM:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jul 13, 2018, at 2:52 PM, U.Mutlu wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Paul Koning wrote on 07/13/2018 08:27 PM:
> I'm trying to see i
Hi Nagy,
Please help us with your comments on the attached patch for the issue
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86512)
Thank you and waiting for your inputs on the same.
~Umesh
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> Thank you and issue raised at
> https://gcc.gnu
21 matches
Mail list logo
