On 07/16/2018 05:44 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As suggested I have created command line option -optimized=[none,
> blocks, stats, vops] to dump the respective gimple bodies of all
> functions.
>
> for example:
>
> -optimized=blocks will dump
Hi.
The name does not make much sense and you removed option that
limited function name. So instead I would create something like:
-fdump-body=foo
and
-fdump-level=optimized
I don't like how you do manual parsing in:
+ if (!strcmp (flag_optimized, "blocks"))
+ flags = TDF_BLOCKS;
+ else if (!strcmp (flag_optimized, "stats"))
+ flags = TDF_STATS;
+ else if (!strcmp (flag_optimized, "vops"))
+ flags = TDF_VOPS;
+ else if (!strcmp (flag_optimized, "none"))
+ flags = TDF_NONE;
As I wrote in previous email, take a look how it's done
in dump_switch_p_1 (const char *arg, struct dump_file_info *dfi, bool doglob)
and reuse that functionality.
Martin
>
> Gimple body of function: main
> main ()
> {
> ;; basic block 2, loop depth 0
> ;; pred: ENTRY
> printf ("%d", 8);
> return 0;
> ;; succ: EXIT
>
> }
>
>
> Gimple body of function: bar
> bar (int a, int b, int cond)
> {
> int ret;
>
> ;; basic block 2, loop depth 0
> ;; pred: ENTRY
> if (cond_2(D) != 0)
> goto <bb 3>; [50.00%]
> else
> goto <bb 4>; [50.00%]
> ;; succ: 3
> ;; 4
>
> ;; basic block 3, loop depth 0
> ;; pred: 2
> ret_5 = a_3(D) + b_4(D);
> goto <bb 5>; [100.00%]
> ;; succ: 5
>
> ;; basic block 4, loop depth 0
> ;; pred: 2
> ret_6 = a_3(D) - b_4(D);
> ;; succ: 5
>
> ;; basic block 5, loop depth 0
> ;; pred: 3
> ;; 4
> # ret_1 = PHI <ret_5(3), ret_6(4)>
> return ret_1;
> ;; succ: EXIT
>
> }
>
>
> Gimple body of function: foo
> foo (int a, int b)
> {
> ;; basic block 2, loop depth 0
> ;; pred: ENTRY
> _3 = a_1(D) + b_2(D);
> return _3;
> ;; succ: EXIT
>
> }
>
> I have pushed the changes to the repo. Please find the diff file
> attached herewith.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hrishikesh
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Martin Liška <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 07/12/2018 08:05 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have added command line options:
>>>
>>> -body=
>>> To dump gimple body (TDF_NONE) of specific function.
>>>
>>> -optimized-blocks=
>>> To dump gimple body (TDF_BLOCKS) of specific function.
>>>
>>> -optimized-stats=
>>> To dump gimple body (TDF_STATS) of specific function.
>>>
>>> -optimized-vops=
>>> To dump gimple body (TDF_VOPS) of specific function.
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Thanks for it. However I would expect something more smart:
>> -optimized=[vops,stats,block]. Note that you should do similar
>> what's done in: gcc/dumpfile.c
>>
>> int
>> gcc::dump_manager::
>> dump_switch_p_1 (const char *arg, struct dump_file_info *dfi, bool doglob)
>>
>> that will automatically parse dump_flags_t flags;
>>
>> Then the copy&parse will not be needed.
>>
>>>
>>> for example:
>>>
>>> -body=foo will dump
>>>
>>> Gimple body of function: foo
>>> foo (int a, int b)
>>> {
>>> <bb 2> [local count: 1073741825]:
>>> _3 = a_1(D) + b_2(D);
>>> return _3;
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> -optimized-blocks=foo will dump
>>>
>>> Gimple body of function: foo
>>> foo (int a, int b)
>>> {
>>> ;; basic block 2, loop depth 0
>>> ;; pred: ENTRY
>>> _3 = a_1(D) + b_2(D);
>>> return _3;
>>> ;; succ: EXIT
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> -optimized-stats=foo will dump
>>>
>>> Gimple body of function: foo
>>> foo (int a, int b)
>>> {
>>> <bb 2> [local count: 1073741825]:
>>> _3 = a_1(D) + b_2(D);
>>> return _3;
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> -optimized-vops=foo will dump
>>>
>>> Gimple body of function: foo
>>> foo (int a, int b)
>>> {
>>> <bb 2> [local count: 1073741825]:
>>> _3 = a_1(D) + b_2(D);
>>> # VUSE <.MEM_4(D)>
>>> return _3;
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> I have pushed the changes to the current branch. Please find the diff
>>> file attached herewith.
>>>
>>> I have tried to follow the coding conventions as far as possible in
>>> this patch. Please let me know if I am missing out something so that I
>>> can improve the same while refactoring and clean up as suggested in
>>> the previous mail.
>>
>> As mentioned in the previous email, indentation level is 2. And every 8
>> spaces
>> are replaced with a tabular. In our patch, you use indentation level equal to
>> one tab, which results in indentation level 8.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Hrishikesh
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:10 AM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for suggestions. I would start working on these points and will
>>>> try to complete as early as possible.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hrishikesh
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Martin Liška <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On 07/09/2018 09:50 AM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The command line option -gimple-stats will dump the statistics of
>>>>>> gimple statements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For example:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ ../stage1-build/gcc/lto-dump test_hello.o -gimple-stats
>>>>>>
>>>>>> will dump:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GIMPLE statements
>>>>>> Kind Stmts Bytes
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>> assignments 3 264
>>>>>> phi nodes 1 248
>>>>>> conditionals 1 80
>>>>>> everything else 12 704
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>> Total 17 1296
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have pushed the changes to the repo. Please find the diff file
>>>>>> attached herewith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hrishikesh
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the work. I briefly took a look at the code and I would
>>>>> focus now directly on refactoring:
>>>>>
>>>>> - please make a new branch, first copy lto-dump.c file and all the
>>>>> Makefile needed stuff and commit that.
>>>>> - next please rebase (squash) all your patches which you have on top
>>>>> of it; you did some formatting corrections and it's very hard to read
>>>>> - please fix coding style, it's mentioned here:
>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html
>>>>> the most problematic is usage of horizontal white spaces. We use 2 spaces
>>>>> for indentation level, and 8 spaces are replaced with a tabular; without
>>>>> that reading your
>>>>> code is very hard for me
>>>>> - then please start refactoring functionality that is copied from lto.c
>>>>> and put shared
>>>>> stuff into a header file that will be used by lto.c and lto-dump.c.
>>>>>
>>>>> Other observations:
>>>>> - you use "\t\t%s\t\t%s\t\t%s" formats for prints; I think it would be
>>>>> better to
>>>>> use fixed strings with spaces, try %20s. It's probably also used by tools
>>>>> like nm or objdump
>>>>> - come up with more specific name for 'entry' and 'compare'
>>>>> - 'entry' should have functions that will print names, ... according to
>>>>> options
>>>>> (flag_lto_dump_demangle, ...); you can have overrides for functions and
>>>>> variables
>>>>> - I would first put all symbols into the vector and then I would print it
>>>>> on a single place
>>>>> - consider using vec from vec.h, hash_map from hash-map.h instead of
>>>>> std:: variants
>>>>> - exit after functions like dump_list, dump_symbol,...
>>>>> - remove dummy 'dump' function
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 10:41 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have added new command line option:
>>>>>>> -objects
>>>>>>> which will dump size, offset and name of each section for all lto
>>>>>>> objects
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for example:
>>>>>>> $ ../stage1-build/gcc/lto-dump test_hello.o test.o -objects
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gives output:
>>>>>>> LTO object name: test_hello.o
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NO. OFFSET SIZE SECTION NAME
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1 64 15 .gnu.lto_.profile.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 2 79 55 .gnu.lto_.icf.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 3 134 134 .gnu.lto_.jmpfuncs.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 4 268 116 .gnu.lto_.inline.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 5 384 24 .gnu.lto_.pureconst.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 6 408 306 .gnu.lto_foo.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 7 714 469 .gnu.lto_bar.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 8 1183 345 .gnu.lto_main.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 9 1528 88 .gnu.lto_.symbol_nodes.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 10 1616 15 .gnu.lto_.refs.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 11 1631 1205 .gnu.lto_.decls.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 12 2836 109 .gnu.lto_.symtab.a7add72ac123628
>>>>>>> 13 2945 76 .gnu.lto_.opts
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LTO object name: test.o
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NO. OFFSET SIZE SECTION NAME
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1 64 15 .gnu.lto_.profile.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 2 79 30 .gnu.lto_.icf.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 3 109 108 .gnu.lto_.jmpfuncs.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 4 217 62 .gnu.lto_.inline.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 5 279 21 .gnu.lto_.pureconst.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 6 300 194 .gnu.lto_koo.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 7 494 389 .gnu.lto_gain.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 8 883 77 .gnu.lto_.symbol_nodes.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 9 960 15 .gnu.lto_.refs.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 10 975 966 .gnu.lto_.decls.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 11 1941 58 .gnu.lto_.symtab.ffab9cb8eb84fc03
>>>>>>> 12 1999 76 .gnu.lto_.opts
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have pushed the changes to the repo. Please find the diff file
>>>>>>> attached herewith.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hrishikesh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have:
>>>>>>>> tried to do all the formatting and style corrections according to
>>>>>>>> output given by check_GNU_style.py
>>>>>>>> removed '-fdump-lto' prefix from the command line options
>>>>>>>> added few necessary comments in the code
>>>>>>>> added command line option -type-stats from previous branch (added a
>>>>>>>> new percentage column to it)
>>>>>>>> for e.g.
>>>>>>>> integer_type 3 25.00%
>>>>>>>> pointer_type 3 25.00%
>>>>>>>> array_type 1 8.33%
>>>>>>>> function_type 5 41.67%
>>>>>>>> I have pushed the changes to the repo. Please find the diff file
>>>>>>>> attached herewith.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hrishikesh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 6:39 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for suggestions. I have started incorporating them. As a first:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have added command line options:
>>>>>>>>> -print-size to print the size of functions and variables
>>>>>>>>> size of variables is in bits and size of functions is represented as
>>>>>>>>> number of basic blocks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -print-value to print the value of initialization of global
>>>>>>>>> variables.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -size-sort to sort the symbol names according to the size.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for example command line options:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ../stage1-build/gcc/lto-dump test_hello.o -fdump-lto-list -print-size
>>>>>>>>> -print-value -size-sort
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the dump is:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Symbol Table
>>>>>>>>> Name Type Visibility Size Value
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> printf function default 0
>>>>>>>>> main function default 3
>>>>>>>>> foo function default 3
>>>>>>>>> bar function default 6
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> z variable default 8 97
>>>>>>>>> k variable default 32 5
>>>>>>>>> p variable default 32
>>>>>>>>> 4.400000095367431640625e+0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have also tried to make memory allocation dynamic to the best of my
>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>> I have pushed the changes to the repo. Please find the diff file
>>>>>>>>> attached herewith.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hrishikesh
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Martin Liška <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 06/27/2018 10:06 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have added new command line options:
>>>>>>>>>>> -no-demangle -> for the default non demangled output
>>>>>>>>>>> -no-sort -> for the list of symbols in order of their occurrence
>>>>>>>>>>> -alpha-sort -> for the list of symbols in their alphabetical order
>>>>>>>>>>> -reverse-sort -> for the list of symbols in reversed order
>>>>>>>>>>> -defined-only -> for only the defined symbols
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Good progress.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> for example:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ../stage1-build/gcc/lto-dump test_hello.o -fdump-lto-list
>>>>>>>>>>> -alpha-sort
>>>>>>>>>>> -demangle -defined-only -reverse-sort
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now as you have a separate tool (lto-dump), you can strip
>>>>>>>>>> 'fdump-lto' prefix
>>>>>>>>>> from the older options.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> will dump
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Symbol Table
>>>>>>>>>>> Name Type Visibility Size
>>>>>>>>>>> main function default
>>>>>>>>>>> k variable default
>>>>>>>>>>> foo function default
>>>>>>>>>>> bar function default
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is a reversed alphabetical order of demangled symbol names which
>>>>>>>>>>> have been defined(hence printf excluded).
>>>>>>>>>>> Along with this I have also added all previous progress with
>>>>>>>>>>> reference
>>>>>>>>>>> to symbol table to the new branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For further options to add like -size-sort and -print-size I tried
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> access size of the symbol with symtab node using
>>>>>>>>>>> TREE_INT_CST_LOW(DECL_SIZE(node->decl));
>>>>>>>>>>> but I am unable to do so.
>>>>>>>>>>> So how should I proceed with it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent advises via instant messaging.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please find the diff file attached herewith. I have also pushed the
>>>>>>>>>>> changes to the new branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please advise,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hrishikesh>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:15 AM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created another branch lto-dump-tool-improved as suggested.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have applied the patch for separation to lto-dump binary, made a
>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary changes in other files and it is running successfully.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will keep on adding previous work to this branch incrementally.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find the diff file attached for dumping of TREE statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> GIMPLE statistics.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> for example:
>>>>>>>>>>>> (after configuring with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats)
>>>>>>>>>>>> -fdump-lto-gimple-stats will dump
>>>>>>>>>>>> GIMPLE statements
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind Stmts Bytes
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> assignments 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> phi nodes 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> conditionals 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> everything else 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> Total 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -fdump-lto-tree-stats will dump
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tree Statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind Nodes Bytes
>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> decls 4327 932672
>>>>>>>>>>>> types 1531 257208
>>>>>>>>>>>> blocks 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> stmts 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> refs 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> exprs 4 128
>>>>>>>>>>>> constants 82 2060
>>>>>>>>>>>> identifiers 4430 177200
>>>>>>>>>>>> vecs 16 28544
>>>>>>>>>>>> binfos 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> ssa names 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> constructors 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> random kinds 7301 291952
>>>>>>>>>>>> lang_decl kinds 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> lang_type kinds 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> omp clauses 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> Total 17691 1689764
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please advise,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hrishikesh
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:00 AM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created another branch lto-dump-tool-improved as suggested.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have applied the patch for separation to lto-dump binary, made
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary changes in other files and it is running successfully.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will keep on adding previous work to this branch incrementally.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find the diff file attached for dumping of TREE statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and GIMPLE
>>>>>>>>>>>>> statistics.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for example:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (after configuring with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -fdump-lto-gimple-stats will dump
>>>>>>>>>>>>> GIMPLE statements
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind Stmts Bytes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> assignments 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> phi nodes 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditionals 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything else 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Total 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -fdump-lto-tree-stats will dump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tree Statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind Nodes Bytes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> decls 4327 932672
>>>>>>>>>>>>> types 1531 257208
>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocks 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stmts 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refs 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exprs 4 128
>>>>>>>>>>>>> constants 82 2060
>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifiers 4430 177200
>>>>>>>>>>>>> vecs 16 28544
>>>>>>>>>>>>> binfos 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ssa names 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> constructors 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> random kinds 7301 291952
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lang_decl kinds 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lang_type kinds 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> omp clauses 0 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Total 17691 1689764
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please advise,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hrishikesh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Martin Liška <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 06/18/2018 10:45 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 17 2018, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to isolate the dump tool into real lto-dump tool.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> started with the copy&paste of lto.c into lto-dump.c and done
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes to Make-lang.in and config-lang.in suggested by Martin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (patch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attached). However when I try to build, I get the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In file included from ../../gcc/gcc/lto/lto-dump.c:24:0:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../gcc/gcc/coretypes.h:397:24: fatal error: insn-modes.h:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No such
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file or directory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation terminated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find the missing dependencies and would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grateful for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestions on how to resolve the issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insn-modes.h is one of header files which are generated at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build time,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you will find it in the gcc subdirectory of your build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory (as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opposed to the source directory).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's patch that works for me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Needed dependency is here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +lto/lto-dump.o: $(LTO_EXE)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's bit artificial, but for now it works. Please start working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on separation of dump infrastructure to lto-dump.c. You'll need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to factor out common code shared in between lto.c and lto-dump.c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
