Snapshot gcc-4.7-20110618 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20110618/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:13:25AM +0700, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote:
> On 06/18/11 11:41 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >Good luck with that endeavor. After the gfortran fork,
> >a certain individual would routinely obfusicate the code
> >in one of the repositories via gratuitious code motion,
> >varaible r
2011/6/19 theUser BL :
>
> Hi Liu
>
>
>> Chris is your boss?
>
>
>
> No. Who is Chris?
>
>
>
>
>> I know that EKOPath is much more better than open64,
>
>
>
> And could code of it useful for GCC or not?
>
>
>
>
>
>> but open64 can compile nothing but spec2000.
>
>
>
> Open64? I have googled at it.
On 06/18/11 11:41 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Good luck with that endeavor. After the gfortran fork,
a certain individual would routinely obfusicate the code
in one of the repositories via gratuitious code motion,
varaible renaming, and whitespace munging. This was an
attempt to neutered diff. Thi
Hello All
(I tried to send a PDF attached to a mail here but it don't work)
For information, I attached under http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Memory_management
the slides I showed today in Victoria room about gengtype & C++
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email
Hi Liu
> Chris is your boss?
No. Who is Chris?
> I know that EKOPath is much more better than open64,
And could code of it useful for GCC or not?
> but open64 can compile nothing but spec2000.
Open64? I have googled at it. Do you mean that at
http://www.open64.net/
I talked
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 06:22:21PM +0700, Christopher Bergstr?m wrote:
> 2011/6/18 Toon Moene :
> > On 06/18/2011 01:02 PM, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote:
> >> On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> >>> On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergstr?m wrote:
Hello All,
For those interested, I uploaded this morning 130 slides on a tutorial
I gave last week on GCC plugins & MELT extensions at Archi11 summer school.
(slides are CC by SA)
See http://gcc-melt.org/ where you can download the PDF file
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://staryn
On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Hi
We're in the process of considering contributing to gfortran for a
special project, but when we started to vet the codebase we hit a bump
in lack of comm
2011/6/18 theUser BL :
>
> Hi!
>
> Currently I have nothing about it found in the mailinglist. So I try to ask
> it: How effect the OpenSource EKOPath the GCC ?
>
> Have a look at the latest press news of PathScale:
> http://www.pathscale.com/taxonomy/term/27
>
> Have additional a look at this art
2011/6/18 Toon Moene :
> On 06/18/2011 01:02 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>
>> On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
>
>>> On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
>
>>>
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
> Hi
>
> We're in the process of considering contribut
On 06/18/2011 01:02 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Hi
We're in the process of considering contributing to gfortran for a
special project, but when we start
On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Hi
We're in the process of considering contributing to gfortran for a
special project, but when we started to vet the codebase we hit a bump
in lack of comm
On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Hi
We're in the process of considering contributing to gfortran for a
special project, but when we started to vet the codebase we hit a bump
in lack of commit history.
Additional information is he
On 06/18/2011 11:24 AM, theUser BL wrote:
Hi!
Currently I have nothing about it found in the mailinglist. So I try to ask it:
How effect the OpenSource EKOPath the GCC ?
Perhaps in this way ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-06/msg00141.html
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone:
> You can use different benchmarks. For me it seems, that with EKOPath compiled
> programs are a lot faster then with GCC.
Hmm.. have tested it again.
It seems, that this is only true without GCC-optimization.
With the option -O I no longer see any difference between the performance of
GCC and
Dear Qiong Cai,
Some time ago I offered you the possibility of making your academic paper
entitled «Profile-guided redundancy elimination» available as printed book.
Since I did not hear back from you, I am now wondering if you received my
first email. I would appreciate if you could confirm your
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll_1.c?view=markup&pathrev=174762
Since several days now I observe Python exceptions in viewcvs ike that:
An Exception Has Occurred
Python Traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/viewvc/lib/v
Hi!
Currently I have nothing about it found in the mailinglist. So I try to ask it:
How effect the OpenSource EKOPath the GCC ?
Have a look at the latest press news of PathScale:
http://www.pathscale.com/taxonomy/term/27
Have additional a look at this articls of phronix:
http://www.phoronix.co
19 matches
Mail list logo
