2011/6/19 theUser BL <theuse...@hotmail.com>: > > Hi Liu > > >> Chris is your boss? > > > > No. Who is Chris? > > > > >> I know that EKOPath is much more better than open64, > > > > And could code of it useful for GCC or not? > > > > > >> but open64 can compile nothing but spec2000. > > > > Open64? I have googled at it. Do you mean that at > > http://www.open64.net/ > > > > I talked about Path64 > > https://github.com/path64 > > > > But you are right, at > > http://www.open64.net/about-open64.html > > there stand, that PathScale using it for EKOPath. > > > > And interestingly Open64 is a port of the old SGI-compiler. > > So Irix was written with MIPSPro and Open64 is a derivated work of it? Thats > nice. > > > > >> So, you want something about Effect, still? > > > > Yes. And I am looking, if there existing other OpenSource Compiler then GCC, > which could be better in some areas. > > > > >> GCC is the real compiler that can work! GCC can bootstrap, can compile >> Linux Kernel, can compile GNU LibC, can compile almost everything. > >> Will open64? Does open64 really can be used? or just a tony with a >> really suck codes? > > > > Why do you talk everytime about open64, when I talk about Path64? > > Open64 is the old one. I think if there existing nice code in it, GCC already > have using it. > > Path64 is the new one, which opens. > > > > >> GCC is the only choice in the real world except LLVM, but never open64. > > > Can you descripe it a little bit more clear? > > What are the disadvantages of Open64 and what are the disadvantages of > EKOPath/Path64? > > > > And if it have only disadvantages over GCC, why are people still working on > Open64 and EKOPath/Path64? > > As I see, the newest version of Open64 was released April 13th, 2011. > > And EKOPath will now the times opened and becomes lot of updates. > > > > Open64 is under the GPL (similar to the GCC). > > But if GCC is the better one, why using PathScale for EKOPath and ENZO Open64 > as base? > > > > But as I said before, it looks that PathScale using additional lot of parts > of GCC: > > https://github.com/path64/compiler/tree/master/GCC > > https://github.com/path64/compiler/tree/master/gcc_incl > > > > Greatings > > theuserbl > > > >
Hi theuserbl What I mean is pathcc is much more better than open64, but not enough to gcc. For pathcc and open64 have the same code-base! Why Pathscale chose it? Fred Chow! Open64 always say "we will replace gcc" for almost 20 years... it still play with spec2000, only! --Liu
