Currently toplev_main calls
init_options_once
init_options_struct
lang_hooks.init_options_struct
which all make sense. It then calls
decode_options
which calls
default_options_optimization
which sets various options based on the optimization level.
That is fine provided all languages ag
Oh, update_version_svn can be apply to
trunk/gcc-4.5-branch/gcc-4.4-branch/gcc-4.3-branch, not only trunk.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:45, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> It's very simple (only for trunk, although it maybe more useful for branches):
>
> Index: update_version_svn
>
It's very simple (only for trunk, although it maybe more useful for branches):
Index: update_version_svn
===
--- update_version_svn (revision 169428)
+++ update_version_svn (working copy)
@@ -42,6 +42,12 @@
SVNROOT2=${SVNROOT}/
On 31 January 2011 01:02, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> Write after approval.
> This is folks that make regular contributions, but do not
> - fall into one of the two previous categories. People with write
> + fall into one of the previous categories. People with write
> after approval need t
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> I am not sure to understand the technical ways to modify that; is CVS
> still mandatory?
Yes, the web pages reside in CVS. Not a lot different from SVN in
terms of operations, just `cvs update`, `cvs diff`, `cvs commit` instead
of the same svn co
I realized that our documentation has not been adjusted to (not so)
recent changes and clarifications around the concepts of maintainers
and reviewers we use. In fact, we don't have global maintainers any
more and introduced the concept of reviewers.
On the way I also tried to clarify that docume
On 31 January 2011 00:25, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
>> Ah, I did look in the NetBSD cvs repository and the other arches I
>> looked at just used _ANSI_H_, I obviously didn't check the ones you
>> identified.
>>
> From a quick look, d
Nocheko so majaslapu un saac pelnit naudu jau tagad
pec pamacibas luukojies sheit: http://www.negaiss-ir-prom.info
Dailonis un Volmars jau pelna!
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Ah, I did look in the NetBSD cvs repository and the other arches I
> looked at just used _ANSI_H_, I obviously didn't check the ones you
> identified.
>
>From a quick look, dreamcast, landisk, hpcsh, usermode and evbsh3 use
fancy heade
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Some archealogy turned up this as the reason canonicalization was
> inserted:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-02/msg01121.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01697.html
>
> Also relevant here is http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29931 .
I am q
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send
> > any other suggestions, or say if you wish to volunteer to maintain one
> > of these targets to avoid deprecation
>
> Thanks for
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send
> any other suggestions, or say if you wish to volunteer to maintain one
> of these targets to avoid deprecation
Thanks for doing this, Joseph!
I am not sure how to formally handl
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> Just for curiousness, why we bump the DATESTAMP when the last commit
> is DATESTAMP changes on the branch ?
As far as I am concerned, that's a bug (or a missing feature). The
script in question is maintainer-scripts/update_version_svn in the GCC
source
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20110130 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20110130/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Dongsheng Song
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:44, Richard Guenther
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> It would be nice if the scripts could check whether only DATESTAMP
> >> changes were done since the last snapshot ...
>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Dongsheng Song
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:44, Richard Guenther
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It would be nice if the scripts could check whether only DATESTAMP
>>> changes were done since the last snapsh
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Dongsheng Song
wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:44, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>>
>> It would be nice if the scripts could check whether only DATESTAMP
>> changes were done since the last snapshot ...
>
> Just for curiousness, why we bump the DATESTAMP when the
The submission deadline for the 3rd Workshop on GCC Opportunities has been
extended until 7 February 2011.
CALL FOR PAPERS
3rd Workshop on
18 matches
Mail list logo
