Hi
I'm facing compilation problem during GCC( 3.2.2 ) installation
in LynxOS under x86 platform. Is there any specific options for
gcc installation configuration under LynxOS ?. Any modifications
needed for compilation?. If anyone experiences these problems
before plz help me with the deta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcin Dalecki wrote:
|
| On 2005-10-03, at 00:26, Andrew Pinski wrote:
|
|>
|> This perl script works just fine for me on powerpc-darwin7.9.0 I don't
|> see why are we piping the output to nm when it should be piping nm's
|> output to c++filt.
|>
|
On 2005-10-03, at 00:26, Andrew Pinski wrote:
This perl script works just fine for me on powerpc-darwin7.9.0 I
don't
see why are we piping the output to nm when it should be piping nm's
output to c++filt.
Also this perl script works fine on powerpc-darwin7.4.0 also.
Turns out it was rpm
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C++ would be a better language if the boolean type did not implicitly
convert from int. For example, many novice programmers make the
mistake.
if (i = j) dosomething(); // Should be i == j
If conversion to boolean required explicit this would all
On 2005-10-03, at 00:49, Shantonu Sen wrote:
You're making a lot of terrible assumptions and drawing several
incorrect conclusions. xnu-792 is not the same as "darwin7.9.2",
and no configure script in the last 6 years should be detecting a
Mac OS X system as "ppc-apple-darwin" (it should b
On 2005-10-03, at 00:42, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
I'm not quite sure if this is correct since guessing the GCC
version interpretation here I would expect this to came out as:
ppc-apple-darwin7.9.2
aka: Tiger darwin 10.4.2
Trying to find out where the actual name mangling occured I have
fou
You're making a lot of terrible assumptions and drawing several
incorrect conclusions. xnu-792 is not the same as "darwin7.9.2", and
no configure script in the last 6 years should be detecting a Mac OS
X system as "ppc-apple-darwin" (it should be "powerpc-apple-darwin").
What is the output
On 2005-10-03, at 00:26, Andrew Pinski wrote:
6) Is this whining reporting significant information, for the
person that wants to fix the bug?
Well on the system in question ppc-apple-darwin-7.8.0 the perl script
in question simply doesn't work. Since there doesn't appear to be
much in the wa
> > 6) Is this whining reporting significant information, for the
> > person that wants to fix the bug?
>
> Well on the system in question ppc-apple-darwin-7.8.0 the perl script
> in question simply doesn't work. Since there doesn't appear to be
> much in the way of it inside acinclude.m4 it
I see more trolling than bug reporting here.
This macros get's set according to acinclude.m4 in libstdc++ for builds
which utilize the glibc. Heck? What's the purpose here? Fortunately
there is no such thing as the glibc on this system at all. Looking at
the m4 macro I can't quite see how
On 2005-10-02, at 23:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
2) Why do you think that symbol versioning is exclusive to glibc?
I don't. I look at the the results of it.
3) You can of course think that glibc is evil, but how is it related?
Oh no... I got just immersed by the GLIBCXX prefixing over there
During a build attempt of gcc-20051001 and more secnt on darwin 10.8
I have discovered that apparently for some unknown reason
make_exports.pl get's called during th libstdc++ build and fails
miserably:
> libstdc++-symbol.explist || (rm -f libstdc++-symbol.explist ;
exit 1)
nm -P .libs/b
Rather than starting up this discussion on gcc@ again, could you please
go read the list archives? I feel like you've missed a couple of years
of context here, including the last few times we discussed why a switch
was in order.
Its not necessary, I wasn't trying to start a debate. I was simply
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:32:50AM -0700, Kean Johnston wrote:
> >Why doesn't it thrill you?
> I think svn is a great tool, don't get me wrong. Very well
> written and got all the features one could want. But I
> don't know (or see) the actual problem you are trying to
> solve. cvs seems to be wrok
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Kean Johnston wrote:
Why doesn't it thrill you?
I think svn is a great tool, don't get me wrong. Very well
written and got all the features one could want. But I
don't know (or see) the actual problem you are trying to
solve. cvs seems to be wroking really well for gcc.
Why doesn't it thrill you?
I think svn is a great tool, don't get me wrong. Very well
written and got all the features one could want. But I
don't know (or see) the actual problem you are trying to
solve. cvs seems to be wroking really well for gcc. The
weaknesses of cvs, such as the pain of rena
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Kean Johnston wrote:
Daniel Berlin wrote:
So, now that the new machine is working, i'm starting to get a lot of
questions about moving to subversion.
If you're going to move to svn (which idea doesn't thrill me)
Why doesn't it thrill you?
then I hope that the repo wil
On Sunday 02 October 2005 19:27, Kean Johnston wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > So, now that the new machine is working, i'm starting to get a lot of
> > questions about moving to subversion.
>
> If you're going to move to svn (which idea doesn't thrill me)
> then I hope that the repo will be an F
> Hi Jan,
>
> I think fixup_reorder_chain contains questionable code to cope with a
> pathological case:
>
> /* The degenerated case of conditional jump jumping to the next
>instruction can happen on target having jumps with side
>effects.
>
>
Daniel Berlin wrote:
So, now that the new machine is working, i'm starting to get a lot of
questions about moving to subversion.
If you're going to move to svn (which idea doesn't thrill me)
then I hope that the repo will be an FSFS one and not BerkeleyDB?
I realize that FSFS hasn't has as much
BTW, anyone who has bugzilla errors, please either email me, or find me on
irc.oftc.net (Nick: DannyB) and i'll fix them immediately for you.
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
This was fixed about 20 minutes ago :), or should have been.
I'll change the wording of the error message.
This was fixed about 20 minutes ago :), or should have been.
I'll change the wording of the error message.
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I like the new theme, by the way.
I've just tried to add a comment to a bug I created yesterday and got
this error:
Unknown Known To Work
So, now that the new machine is working, i'm starting to get a lot of
questions about moving to subversion.
The answer is thus:
1. My laptop, where i keep all the test stuff and scripts, is about to be
sent back to IBM for repair (I have backups, etc, it's just i don't want
to be converting f
I like the new theme, by the way.
I've just tried to add a comment to a bug I created yesterday and got
this error:
Unknown Known To Work Version
3.3.3 is not a known version for use in the known to work field.
The legal versions are listed in the version popup.
I've been able to a
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 04:50:41PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
jcm>> GCC 4.0 has been shortlisted in this year's Linux Awards:
jcm>> * http://www.linuxawards.co.uk/content/view/14/40/
> Going from the mailing lists there are about ten of us heavily
> involved in gcc here in the UK. I'm not sur
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:28:03AM -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Hi I'm new to the list. Wow it's great. Why isn't Richard Stallman
> working on gcc?
He was promoted to management. :-)
Jon Masters writes:
>
> GCC 4.0 has been shortlisted in this year's Linux Awards:
>
> * http://www.linuxawards.co.uk/content/view/14/40/
> * Best Linux/Open Source Developer Tool.
>
> BUT...none of the folks in the office can apparently contact anyone
> about being available
Folks,
GCC 4.0 has been shortlisted in this year's Linux Awards:
* http://www.linuxawards.co.uk/content/view/14/40/
* Best Linux/Open Source Developer Tool.
BUT...none of the folks in the office can apparently contact anyone
about being available to attend the dinner next week in
* Peter Lupton NCH Swift Sound <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051002 05:47]:
> I was hoping was that we could at least have a compile option. So we could
> turn it on if required. I would definitely mandate it in our organization
> at least. I am sure others would too.
I'd looked into getting some boolean
Hi I'm new to the list. Wow it's great. Why isn't Richard Stallman
working on gcc?
I'm new to compiler design and I'm looking to learn all I can. I guess
I'll have to catch on on the fly.
Bill
... the recent fix in mainline of gcc/stor-layout.c... could someone
pls import that into the gomp branch too?
--
Cheers,
/ChJ
31 matches
Mail list logo
