On 19 April 2011 10:08, Lars Segerlund wrote:
> NOW :-D
>
> I read that 2.6 was released, so I figure it's time to start looking
> at compositioning ? :-D
Compositing.
> I just had to ask ! :-D ( 2.6 looks nice btw. )
I'm working on some house-keeping for FVWM, but sure.
-- Thomas Adam
NOW :-D
I read that 2.6 was released, so I figure it's time to start looking
at compositioning ? :-D
I just had to ask ! :-D ( 2.6 looks nice btw. )
/ best regards, Lars Segerlund.
2010/11/30 Thomas Adam :
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>> Hi Thomas
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Lars Segerlund wrote:
> Hi Thomas, would you elaborate a bit please ?
>
> 2010/11/30 Thomas Adam :
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:11:10AM +0100, Lars Segerlund wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Stupid question, would it not be possible to write a compositioning
Hi Thomas, would you elaborate a bit please ?
2010/11/30 Thomas Adam :
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:11:10AM +0100, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Stupid question, would it not be possible to write a compositioning
>> module for fvwm ?
>
> It would for 2.6, yes. Although even then, I would
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:11:10AM +0100, Lars Segerlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stupid question, would it not be possible to write a compositioning
> module for fvwm ?
It would for 2.6, yes. Although even then, I would *much* rather see
something like xcompmgr augmented/cleaned up instead, as a stan
Hi,
Stupid question, would it not be possible to write a compositioning
module for fvwm ?
I had a hack somewhere and if I remember correctly when you run
compositioning you reparent to offscreen memory, menus and such in
fvwm are rendered into windows are they not ?
With some magic all the st
