On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>  Hi Thomas, would you elaborate a bit please ?
> 
> 2010/11/30 Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org>:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:11:10AM +0100, Lars Segerlund wrote:
> >>  Hi,
> >>
> >>  Stupid question, would it not be possible to write a compositioning
> >> module for fvwm ?
> >
> > It would for 2.6, yes.  Although even then, I would *much* rather see
> > something like xcompmgr augmented/cleaned up instead, as a standalone tool.
> >
> 
>  Correct me if I am wrong, but if there were something like xcompmgr
> augmented and cleaned up, wouldn't a nice way to interact be through a
> module ?

Yes it would.  Just like FvwmDecorator which is on the todo-2.6 list.  But
to do this, and to do it *right* requires much more discussion, and many
more changes than just shoe-horning in what you're describing, alas.

At the moment, I'm saying:

* It's a good idea.  Wait.
* Wait.
* Wait for 2.6.
* Wait.
* And when we start discussing things for 2.6 properly, this will be
  included.

Given the amount of work needed, Lars, don't waste your time trying to do in
now -- it's just not worth it.  Really.

-- Thomas Adam

Reply via email to