On Sun 2024-02-04 09:51 , Stuart Longland wrote:
> So either some of us need to step up and get familiar with how X11 works
> (unlikely, it seems like a monumental task)… or we need to "pack our bags",
> so to speak
It hurts, but my sense is that the above is right. IMHO the
distributions effe
uot;. Or at least not
*only* about focus. It is about whether my browser is or isn't
withing an active viewport.
This is annoying. It forces me to keep my firefox presentation
in an active viewport. How can I work this around?
Thanks,
Martin
he window is
shown rather than on the window name.
Is there a reasonable way of doing this? How?
Thanks,
Martin
Hi again,
thank you all for your hints.
root-tail works out of the box, but for flexibility and better formatting
of the output, I'll give the label-in-FvwmButton-approach a shot. Looks
pretty easy going.
Cheers,
Martin
--
fvwm3 1.0.0 (1.0.0-10-g424a650e)
with support for: ReadLine,
x27;t very flexible.
Any other hints doing this?
Thanks,
Martin
--
fvwm3 1.0.0 (1.0.0-10-g424a650e)
with support for: ReadLine, RPlay, XPM, PNG, SVG, Shape, XShm, SM,
XRandR, XRender, XCursor, XFT, NLS
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu 2020-09-03 20:14 , Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 12:13:45PM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote:
[ ... stuff deleted ... ]
> > Currently, I'm just gonna to go with fvwm3 conflicts with fvwm2 and
> > only one of those can be installed at a time.
>
> I don't like this naming sch
On Thu 2020-09-03 09:49 , Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 02:06:10AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > Well, we did it. Version 1.0.0 of Fvwm3 is now live and ready to be
> > installed.
>
> Um, can we call that fvwm-3.0.0 instead of fvwm3-1.0.0 please?
> Renaming the project because
pdates (t=t@entry=0x559b7902c460,
flags=flags@entry=0x7ffe4630baf8, pstyle=pstyle@entry=0x7ffe4630bb00,
focus_w=focus_w@entry=0x559b7902c460) at update.c:180
#16 0x559b77dad0c2 in flush_window_updates () at update.c:727
#17 0x559b77d5e755 in HandleEvents () at events.c:4199
#18 0x559b77d3b59a in main (argc=, argv=) at
fvwm.c:2590
(gdb)
===
Martin
On Fri 2019-01-04 13:11 , Mandar Mitra wrote:
> I haven't used Fedora in a very long time, but once upon a
> time, rpm -qa --last would give you a list of packages in
> most-recently-installed/updated-first order. That should give
> you some hint about what might have changed.
(To list the dnf
your dnf transation
history [1].
Others might have smarter recommendations though.
Martin.
---
[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/24/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sec-DNF-Transaction_History.html
On Thu 2019-01-03 00:19 , Oleg Tyurin wrote:
> Hi. Please help me unders
t; derived distribution and would like to share their experience please?
I didn't test on CentOS, but did on RHEL-{6,7}. Configuring EPEL [1]
and installing fvwm using yum might be all you need.
Martin
---
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
project.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1783
Martin
Hi Thomas,
On Mon 2016-08-29 21:50 , Thomas Adam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and wondered
> if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition was held in the
> early 2000s. Is it time for an update?
>
> If so, send some ide
Hey guys,
no such issue seen of Fedora 16, 20, 23, and CentOS 7.
Using distribution packages exclusively.
Martin
On Wed 2016-03-30 06:12 , Michael Großer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a problem with newer versions of Firefox (and Thunderbird), so
> after several months (probab
Michael
FVWM is unique. I'd love it to survive. Forking and "doing things
right" might be a catharsis for an individual but not necessarily
a real benefit for our VM from both the user- and developer
community pow.
Martin
On Tue 2014-04-22 20:35 , Viktor Griph wrote:
> 2014-04-22 20:09 GMT+02:00 Martin Cermak :
> > [...]
> > Any further ideas or thoughts?
>
> Does using the style "OpaqueMoveSize 0" also leave artifacts on the
> screen when moving windows, or is it j
Hi,
On Tue 2014-04-22 18:32 , Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:52:09PM -0400, Dan.Espen wrote:
> > Martin Cermak writes:
> > > Recently I noticed an issue moving windows using FVWM. The issue
> > > is described in [1] and seems to be HW dependent
Hello there!
Recently I noticed an issue moving windows using FVWM. The issue
is described in [1] and seems to be HW dependent. However,
successful usage of some other VMs on affected boxes makes me
think that the issue might be on the FVWM side. Ideas? Thoughts?
Regards,
Martin
Hans Voss wrote on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:29:27PM +0100:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 14:45, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> > Yes, it would work reasonably well in the situation where I watch a
> > movie on the non-work screen. ?Make xine sticky, be free to switch the
> > left d
Hans Voss wrote on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:41:18PM +0100:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 23:51, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> >
> > If Xorg removes classic dual-head support then the party of having a
> > movie on the right screen and switchable desktop on the left is over,
> >
Thomas Adam wrote on Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:11:43PM +:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 04:33:13PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> > Hello :-)
> >
> > Some of you might have seen my discussion on the Xorg list about the
> > classic dual-screen mode effectively being
a what would be involved
in doing this?
Why would this be any easier than -say- dividing a single screen into
sections that you can do separate virtual desktop switching on?
Thanks
Martin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauerhttp://www.cons.org/cr
Sorry, but I accidentally sent this private the first time.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 07:35:21PM -0500, Dan Espen despen-at-verizon.net
|fvwm| wrote:
> >> Question 0.1 in the FAQ?
> >
> > No. The bindings work in the main window manager, but not in the
> > Xnested window manager. They also fail f
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 09:13:03PM -0500, Dan Espen despen-at-verizon.net
|fvwm| wrote:
> Chuck Martin writes:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:25:24AM +, Thomas Adam
> > thomas.adam22-at-gmail.com |fvwm| wrote:
> >> 2008/12/19 Chuck Martin :
> >> > Does
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 01:30:30AM +, Thomas Adam
thomas.adam22-at-gmail.com |fvwm| wrote:
> 2008/12/23 Chuck Martin :
> > Could you be more specific? I've noticed that it works sometimes, but
>
> Not really --- could you try Xephyr?
Where do I find Xephyr? From wh
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:25:24AM +, Thomas Adam
thomas.adam22-at-gmail.com |fvwm| wrote:
> 2008/12/19 Chuck Martin :
> > Does anyone know why my keybindings fail when fvwm is run under xnest?
> > I simply get an error for each binding that says "no such key".
&g
Does anyone know why my keybindings fail when fvwm is run under xnest?
I simply get an error for each binding that says "no such key".
Chuck
27 matches
Mail list logo
