On Tue 2014-08-19 10:09 , Michael Treibton wrote: > But then why can't this be done ontop of fvwm2 in CVS? i don't really > like the fork and it does seem difficult to understand the > relationship of mvwm to fvwm at the moment. as a user which one do i > use? > > Michael
FVWM is unique. I'd love it to survive. Forking and "doing things right" might be a catharsis for an individual but not necessarily a real benefit for our VM from both the user- and developer community pow. Martin
